Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Immunol. Mar 27, 2015; 5(1): 1-15
Published online Mar 27, 2015. doi: 10.5411/wji.v5.i1.1
Published online Mar 27, 2015. doi: 10.5411/wji.v5.i1.1
Table 1 Clinical study outcomes of ipilimumab (anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4) in solid tumors
Ref. | Phase | Cancer type | No. of patients | Dose (mg/kg) | Outcome |
McDermott et al[73] | 3 | Melanoma | 676 | 3 | 3-yr survival rate 25% |
Hodi et al[74] | 3 | Melanoma | 676 | 3 | BORR: 10.9% |
Robert et al[70] | 3 | Melanoma | 676 | 3 | BORR: 37.5% |
Margolin et al[71] | 2 | Melanoma with brain metastasis | 93 | 10 | 1Cohort A: 18% disease control 2Cohort B: 5% disease control |
Di Giacomo et al[69] | N/A | Melanoma | 27 | 10 | 2-yr survival rate 23.5% |
Yang et al[78] | 2 | Pancreatic adenocarcinoma | 27 | 3 | No responders |
O’Day et al[68] | 2 | Melanoma | 155 | 10 | BORR: 5.8% |
Wolchok et al[67] | 2 | Melanoma | 217 | 10 | BORR: 11.1% |
Yang et al[78] | 2 | RCC | 40 | 3 | PR: 12.5% |
Phan et al[66] | 1 | Melanoma | 14 | 3 | OR: 21% |
Table 2 Clinical study outcomes of anti-programmed death-1 or anti-programmed death ligand-1 antibody in solid tumors
Ref. | Phase | Cancer type | No. of patients | Antibody type | Outcome |
Hamid et al[75] | 2 | Melanoma | 135 | Lambrolizumab | RECIST: 1.1; RR: 38% (95%CI: 25-44) |
Weber et al[85] | 1 | Melanoma | 90 | Nivolumab | RECIST: 1.1; RR: 25% |
Brahmer et al[86] | 1 | Advanced cancers | 207 | Anti-PD-L1 | OR: 6%-17% |
Topalian et al[83] | 1 | Advanced cancers | 296 | Nivolumab | OR: 18%-36% |
Table 3 Ongoing clinical Trials in combination anti-programmed death-1 and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 Blockade
Identifier | Phase | Cancer type | Checkpoint antibodies | Status |
NCT02060188 | 2 | Microsatellite High (MSI-H) Colon Cancer | Nivolumab, ipilimumab | Recruiting |
NCT01454102 | 1 | NSCLC | Nivolumab, ipilimumab | Recruiting |
NCT01472081 | 1 | RCC | Nivolumab, ipilimumab | Recruiting |
NCT01024231 | 1b | Melanoma | MDX-1106, ipilimumab | Active |
NCT01928394 | 1/2 | TNBC, GC, PC, SCLC, BC | Nivolumab, ipilimumab | Recruiting |
NCT02017717 | 2b | GBM | Nivolumab, ipilimumab | Recruiting |
NCT01927419 | 2 | Melanoma | Nivolumab, ipilimumab | Active |
NCT01844505 | 3 | Melanoma | Nivolumab, ipilimumab | Active |
NCT01592370 | 1 | Hematologic malignancy | Nivolumab, ipilimumab | Recruiting |
NCT01783938 | 2 | Melanoma | Nivolumab1, ipilimumab | Recruiting |
Table 4 Clinical study outcomes of combination chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade
Ref. | Phase | Cancer type | Treatment combination | Outcome |
Robert et al[70] | 3 | Melanoma | Ipilimumab + dacarbazine | 3-yr survival 20.8% (P < 0.001) |
Lynch et al[94] | 2 | NSCLC | Ipilimumab + paclitaxel, carboplatin (phased) | irPFS HR: 0.72, P = 0.05 |
Reck et al[95] | 2 | SCLC | Ipilimumab + paclitaxel, carboplatin (phased) | irPFS HR: 0.64, P = 0.03 |
Hersh et al[90] | 2 | Melanoma | Ipilimumab + dacarbazine | ORR: 14.3% (95%CI: 4.8-30.3) |
- Citation: Patel MA, Kim JE, Ruzevick J, Lim M. Present and future of immune checkpoint blockade: Monotherapy to adjuvant approaches. World J Immunol 2015; 5(1): 1-15
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2824/full/v5/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5411/wji.v5.i1.1