Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2016; 5(1): 60-65
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60
Table 1 Patient characteristics
| RP (n = 54) | TP (n = 37) | P | |
| Age at time of surgery, mean (SD) | 56.5 (13) | 57.2 (11.6) | 0.801 |
| BMI (SD) | 31.1 (5.8) | 32.1 (7.0) | 0.511 |
| Race | |||
| Asian | 1 (1.9%) | 0 | 0.452 |
| Black | 3 (5.6%) | 3 (8.1%) | |
| Hispanic | 7 (13.0%) | 2 (5.4%) | |
| Other | 0 | 1 (2.7%) | |
| White | 43 (79.6%) | 31 (83.8%) | |
| Sex | |||
| Female | 17 (31.5%) | 17 (46.0%) | 0.163 |
| Male | 37 (68.5%) | 20 (54.1%) | |
| Preoperative creatinine, mean (SD) | 0.95 (0.21) n = 53 | 0.90 (0.17) n = 36 | 0.271 |
Table 2 Tumor characteristics
| RP (n = 54) | TP (n = 37) | P | |
| Renal location | |||
| Left | 20 (37.0%) | 22 (59.5%) | 0.043 |
| Right | 34 (63.0%) | 15 (40.5%) | |
| Pathologic tumor size (cm), mean (SD) | 3.1 (1.6) n = 53 | 2.9 (1.2) n = 36 | 0.541 |
| Surgical margin | |||
| Negative | 50 (98.0%) | 32 (91.4%) | 0.302 |
| Positive | 1 (2.0%) | 3 (8.6%) | |
| RENAL score, mean (SD) | 6.5 (1.9) | 6.6 (1.8) | 0.711 |
| Radius | |||
| 1 | 42 (77.8%) | 33 (89.2%) | 0.412 |
| 2 | 10 (18.5%) | 4 (10.8%) | |
| 3 | 2 (3.7%) | 0 | |
| Exophytic | |||
| 1 | 29 (53.7%) | 15 (40.5%) | 0.412 |
| 2 | 20 (37.0%) | 19 (51.4%) | |
| 3 | 5 (9.3%) | 3 (8.1%) | |
| Nearness | |||
| 1 | 23 (42.6%) | 15 (40.5%) | 0.943 |
| 2 | 8 (14.8%) | 5 (13.5%) | |
| 3 | 23 (42.6%) | 17 (46.0%) | |
| Location relative to polar line | |||
| 1 | 30 (55.6%) | 19 (51.4%) | 0.513 |
| 2 | 12 (22.2%) | 6 (16.2%) | |
| 3 | 12 (22.2%) | 12 (32.4%) |
Table 3 Operative factors
| RP (n = 54) | TP (n = 37) | P | |
| Total operative time (SD) | 180.7 (62.3) | 227.8 (59.0) | < 0.0011 |
| Robot console time, mean (SD) | 126.9 (40.0) | 164.3 (51.3) | < 0.0011 |
| WIT, median (IQR)4 | 28.0 (20-31) | 27.0 (21-31) | 0.963 |
| n = 23 | n = 28 | ||
| Conversion | |||
| No | 52 (96.3%) | 32 (86.5%) | 0.122 |
| Yes | 2 (3.7%) | 5 (13.5%) | |
| EBL, median (IQR) | 32.5 (20-100) | 150.0 (50-250) | < 0.0013 |
Table 4 Renal function
- Citation: Wetterlin JJ, Blackwell RH, Capodice S, Kliethermes S, Quek ML, Gupta GN. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A comparison of approaches to the posterior renal mass. World J Clin Urol 2016; 5(1): 60-65
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v5/i1/60.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60
