Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Pediatr. Feb 8, 2018; 7(1): 27-35
Published online Feb 8, 2018. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v7.i1.27
Published online Feb 8, 2018. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v7.i1.27
Table 1 American Heart Association guidelines for diagnosis of Kawasaki disease (2017)[13]
Classic KD is diagnosed with fever persisting for least 5 d |
At least four of the five principal clinical features: |
Changes in lips and oral cavity: Erythema, lips cracking, strawberry tongue, diffuse injection of oral and pharyngeal mucosae |
Changes in extremities |
Acute: Erythema of palms, soles; edema of hands, feet |
Subacute: Periungual peeling of fingers and toes in weeks 2 and 3 |
Polymorphous exanthema (diffuse maculopapular, urticarial, erythroderma, erythema-multiforme like, not vesicular or bullous) |
Bilateral bulbar conjunctival injection without exudates |
Cervical lymphadenopathy (> 1.5 cm diameter), usually unilateral |
A careful history may reveal that ≥ 1 principal clinical features were present during the illness but resolved by the time of presentation |
Exclusion of other diseases with similar findings (e.g., scarlet fever, viral infections like measles, adenovirus, enterovirus, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic shock syndrome, drug hypersensitivity reactions, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis) |
Table 2 Kawasaki Disease Research Committee guidelines (Japanese Ministry of Health guidelines) for diagnosis of Kawasaki disease (2002)[14]
Five of the following six criteria |
Fever persisting ≥ 5 d |
Bilateral conjunctival congestion |
Changes of lips and oral cavity |
Polymorphous exanthema |
Changes of peripheral extremities |
Acute non-purulent cervical lymphadenopathy |
Duration of fever | In the presence of ≥ 4 principal clinical features, particularly when redness and swelling of the hands and feet are present, KD can be diagnosed even with 4 d of fever |
History | Presence of one or more principal clinical manifestations of disease that can be revealed on history but have disappeared by the time of presentation, have been considered important for diagnosis |
KD shock syndrome | KDSS has been given special consideration in the 2017 revised guidelines because in the presence of shock the diagnosis of KD is often not considered |
KD in infants | Clinicians should have a lower threshold for diagnosis of KD in this age group |
Incomplete KD | Algorithm for incomplete KD has been simplified |
KD and infections | The issue of infections and KD has been detailed at length. Diagnosis of KD must not be excluded even in the presence of a documented infection when typical clinical features of KD are present |
Bacterial lymphadenitis | Ultrasonography and computed tomography findings in differentiating the 2 conditions- bacterial lymphadenitis is often single and has a hypoechoic core on ultrasonography, while lymphadenopathy in KD is usually multiple and is associated with retropharyngeal edema or phlegmon |
2D-echocardigraphy | The limitations of echocardiography and other diagnostic modalities have been highlighted. Z-score (by Manlihot et al) for severity classification of coronary artery abnormalities has been adapted |
Table 4 Coronary artery abnormalities severity classification in different guidelines
Criteria | Description |
JMH criteria[14] | Aneurysm definition |
< 5 yr - ID > 3 mm | |
≥ 5 yr - ID > 4 mm | |
Updated JMH (2008)[93] | Small aneurysm (dilatation with ID < 4 mm or if child is ≥ 5 yr of age, ID ≤ 1.5 times that of an adjacent segment) |
Medium aneurysm (dilatation with ID > 4 mm but ≤ 8 mm or if child is ≥ 5 yr of age, ID 1.5 to 4 times that of an adjacent segment) | |
Large aneurysm (dilatation with ID > 8 mm or if child is ≥ 5 yr of age, ID > 4 times that of an adjacent segment) | |
AHA 2004 criteria[1] | Aneurysm ID z score > 2.5 (as per body surface area adjusted z scores) |
Small: < 5 mm | |
Medium: 5 to 8 mm | |
Giant aneurysm: > 8 mm based on absolute diameter | |
AHA 2017 criteria (Manlhiot et al)[13,68] | No involvement (Z score < 2) |
Dilation only (Z score 2 to < 2.5; or if initially < 2, a decrease in Z score during follow-up ≥ 1 thereby suggesting that coronary artery was dilated during acute stage though diameter was within normal standards and the diameter has regressed on follow-up) | |
Small aneurysm (Z score ≥ 2.5 to < 5) | |
Medium aneurysm (Z score ≥ 5 to < 10, and absolute dimension < 8 mm) | |
Large or giant aneurysm (≥ 10, or absolute dimension ≥ 8 mm) |
- Citation: Pilania RK, Bhattarai D, Singh S. Controversies in diagnosis and management of Kawasaki disease. World J Clin Pediatr 2018; 7(1): 27-35
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v7/i1/27.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v7.i1.27