Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2026; 15(4): 120900
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.120900
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.120900
Table 1 Basic study, patients, fracture, and management characteristics of the included patients
| Ref. | Country of origin | Study type | Patient number (fracture number) | Age (years) | Gender | Side | Dominant side | Fracture location | Fracture location and description | Injury to surgery time | Indication for surgery | Treatment details | Size of screws | Postoperative protocol |
| d’Oliveira and Craviotto[22], 2023 | Uruguay | Case report | 1 (2) | 8 | M | Right side | No | Metacarpal of the middle and ring finger | Shaft spiral fractures | NR | Spiral configuration, rotational malalignment with scissoring | Closed reduction and fixation using antegrade IMHS | 30-mm length headless screw for the 4th metacarpal, and a 32-mm screw for the 3rd metacarpal. Both screws were 2.4 mm in diameter | Splint for 1 week, followed by early mobilization |
| Ayık et al[23], 2025 | Turkey | Case series | 11 (11) | 9.4 (5-15) | 8 M and 3 F | 8 right and 3 left | 8 hands | Proximal phalanx: 5 index fingers; 3 middle fingers; 2 ring fingers; and 1 little finger | 4 at the neck level, 4 at the shaft, and 3 at the base | 2.5 days (0-9) | Unstable fractures (rotation, shortening, or displacement), fractures involving the neck, shaft, or closed physeal base; loss of reduction after conservative treatment | Closed reduction and 7 had retrograde IMHS fixation, 4 had antegrade IMHS fixation | NR | Same day discharge- Immobilization for 3-5 days. At the 5th postoperative day, home exercises and early ROM were started under supervision by a physiotherapist |
| Maes et al[21], 2025 | Belgium | Case report | 1 (1) | 12 | M | Right | NR | Proximal phalanx of the ring finger | Mid-diaphyseal | 4 weeks (initially treated conservatively) | Malunion with volar angulation of 50 degrees (impeding finger ROM) | Closed reduction and retrograde IMHS fixation | A cannulated compression headless screw of 2 mm diameter | A protective orthosis and buddy loop were applied, and physical therapy was initiated early |
Table 2 Detailed outcomes (functional, radiological, and complications) of the included patients
| Ref. | Follow up period (months) | Functional outcome | Radiological outcome | Complications | Hardware removal |
| d’Oliveira and Craviotto[22], 2023 | 6 | No pain - no limitation of daily activities - DASH score was zero | Adequate bony union was achieved, and no displacement or rotational malalignment | None | NR |
| Ayık et al[23], 2025 | 29.1 (24-36) | 10 patients had normal finger function; 1 patient had mild restriction | Fracture union was achieved within the first month in 9 patients, and within 2 months in 2 patients. No signs of joint degeneration | None | No routine removal was recommended. One patient had a retrograde screw removal at the parents’ request |
| ROM compared with the contralateral side showed the following deficits: MCP joint: 1.8 (range 0-10), PIP joint: 2.7 (range: 0-10), and DIP joint: 0.9 (range: 0-10) | |||||
| Pain VAS score of 0.09 (range: 0-1) | |||||
| Functional VAS score of 9.7 (range: 8-10) | |||||
| Aesthetic satisfaction VAS score of 9.9 (range: 9-10) | |||||
| Grip strength showed an average 10% (range: 0-20) deficit compared to the contralateral hand (tested in patients > 10 years of age) | |||||
| Overall, 10 patients had excellent outcomes, while 1 had a good outcome1 | |||||
| Maes et al[21], 2025 | 12 | Full finger ROM was restored after 4 weeks postoperatively | Stable screw positioning without any signs of breakage or loosening- no degeneration at the PIP joint | None | Neither performed nor planned |
| At 1 year, finger length growth was normal - no pain - full ROM in all fingers and a symmetrical power grip |
- Citation: Khalifa AA, Megahed AA, Imran A. Safety of intramedullary headless screw fixation for pediatric hand fractures: A systematic review. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(4): 120900
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i4/120900.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.120900