BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2026; 15(4): 120900
Published online Dec 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.120900
Table 1 Basic study, patients, fracture, and management characteristics of the included patients
Ref.
Country of origin
Study type
Patient number (fracture number)
Age (years)
Gender
Side
Dominant side
Fracture location
Fracture location and description
Injury to surgery time
Indication for surgery
Treatment details
Size of screws
Postoperative protocol
d’Oliveira and Craviotto[22], 2023UruguayCase report1 (2)8MRight sideNoMetacarpal of the middle and ring fingerShaft spiral fracturesNRSpiral configuration, rotational malalignment with scissoringClosed reduction and fixation using antegrade IMHS30-mm length headless screw for the 4th metacarpal, and a 32-mm screw for the 3rd metacarpal. Both screws were 2.4 mm in diameterSplint for 1 week, followed by early mobilization
Ayık et al[23], 2025TurkeyCase series11 (11)9.4 (5-15)8 M and 3 F8 right and 3 left8 handsProximal phalanx: 5 index fingers; 3 middle fingers; 2 ring fingers; and 1 little finger4 at the neck level, 4 at the shaft, and 3 at the base2.5 days (0-9)Unstable fractures (rotation, shortening, or displacement), fractures involving the neck, shaft, or closed physeal base; loss of reduction after conservative treatmentClosed reduction and 7 had retrograde IMHS fixation, 4 had antegrade IMHS fixationNRSame day discharge- Immobilization for 3-5 days. At the 5th postoperative day, home exercises and early ROM were started under supervision by a physiotherapist
Maes et al[21], 2025BelgiumCase report1 (1)12MRightNRProximal phalanx of the ring fingerMid-diaphyseal4 weeks (initially treated conservatively)Malunion with volar angulation of 50 degrees (impeding finger ROM)Closed reduction and retrograde IMHS fixationA cannulated compression headless screw of 2 mm diameterA protective orthosis and buddy loop were applied, and physical therapy was initiated early
Table 2 Detailed outcomes (functional, radiological, and complications) of the included patients
Ref.Follow up period (months)Functional outcomeRadiological outcomeComplicationsHardware removal
d’Oliveira and Craviotto[22], 20236No pain - no limitation of daily activities - DASH score was zeroAdequate bony union was achieved, and no displacement or rotational malalignmentNoneNR
Ayık et al[23], 202529.1 (24-36)10 patients had normal finger function; 1 patient had mild restrictionFracture union was achieved within the first month in 9 patients, and within 2 months in 2 patients. No signs of joint degenerationNoneNo routine removal was recommended. One patient had a retrograde screw removal at the parents’ request
ROM compared with the contralateral side showed the following deficits: MCP joint: 1.8 (range 0-10), PIP joint: 2.7 (range: 0-10), and DIP joint: 0.9 (range: 0-10)
Pain VAS score of 0.09 (range: 0-1)
Functional VAS score of 9.7 (range: 8-10)
Aesthetic satisfaction VAS score of 9.9 (range: 9-10)
Grip strength showed an average 10% (range: 0-20) deficit compared to the contralateral hand (tested in patients > 10 years of age)
Overall, 10 patients had excellent outcomes, while 1 had a good outcome1
Maes et al[21], 202512Full finger ROM was restored after 4 weeks postoperativelyStable screw positioning without any signs of breakage or loosening- no degeneration at the PIP jointNoneNeither performed nor planned
At 1 year, finger length growth was normal - no pain - full ROM in all fingers and a symmetrical power grip


Write to the Help Desk