Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 118963
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i2.118963
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i2.118963
Table 1 Post workshop survey results on participants’ engagement, relevance and usefulness
| Strongly disagree (%) | Disagree (%) | Neither agree nor disagree (%) | Agree (%) | Strongly agree (%) | |
| Workshop delivery | |||||
| Orientation to workshop was clear | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 |
| Content was presented in a logical sequence | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 |
| Briefing activity and reflection format worked well | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 44 |
| Promoted team approach | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 |
| Facilitators and participants were supportive | 0 | 0 | 10 | 60 | 30 |
| Sufficient time was allocated for interactive learning | 0 | 0 | 10 | 60 | 30 |
| Course material | |||||
| Pre-workshop materials were user friendly | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 20 |
| Post workshop tools and handouts were made available | 0 | 0 | 10 | 70 | 20 |
| Templates with scripts were relevant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 78 | 22 |
| Case scenarios matched real-world scenarios | 0 | 0 | 10 | 70 | 20 |
Table 2 Post workshop survey results on participants’ engagement, relevance and usefulness
| Highly dissatisfied (%) | Dissatisfied (%) | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (%) | Satisfied (%) | Highly satisfied (%) | |
| Experience with the workshop | |||||
| Satisfied with overall quality of the workshop | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 |
| Satisfied with active learning | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 |
| Felt safe to take risks or make mistakes during the workshop | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 |
Table 3 Challenges encountered and mitigation strategies
| Challenge | Mitigation strategy |
| Excessive pre-workshop reading material assigned for a single week | Summarize key learning points to support quick and efficient review |
| Imbalanced workshop structure with disproportionate time spent on didactic content | Restructure the workshop to reduce didactic time and increase opportunities for interactive and immersive learning |
| Lengthy video content reduced engagement | Edit videos to focus on essential messages and assign them as pre-workshop material with a brief evaluation quiz |
| Inadequate emphasis on documentation expectations during the workshop | Add a scenario requiring participants to create a consult note using pre-filled structured templates and documentation prompts |
| Compressed two-hour schedule made participants feel rushed | Extend the workshop duration to four hours and include a 30-minute break to allow adequate time for reflection and discussion |
| Difficulty in trainees taking up expectant parents’ role in scenario 2 involving shared decision-making conversation | Have standardized patients’ or standardized health professional e.g. Neonatologist take on this role |
| Mixed experience levels made role-playing difficult for novice participants | Introduce progressive learning levels that allow participants to start at a comfortable level and advance stepwise through:1. Basic consult using medical templates2. Eliciting family context in non-decision-making scenarios3. Exploring values in decision-making scenarios4. Integrating values into care planning |
- Citation: Katurura DF, Van Breemen C, Lusney N, Kieran E, Wiebe T, Albersheim S, Manhas D, Dahan M, Shivananda S. Integrating family values into antenatal consultations: An observational study on structured communication training curriculum for neonatal care providers. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(2): 118963
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i2/118963.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v15.i2.118963