BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 117843
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i2.117843
Table 1 Co-development in of gut microbiome, immune system and brain and cognitive functions in early life (the critical window)
Time frame
Gut microbiome development
Immune system development
Brain/cognitive development
Prenatal (in utero)Microbiome density increases rapidly leading up to birthImmature: Components are developing but not fully functionalFoundation laid: Neurulation, neural proliferation, neuronal migration, and initial axon growth are active
Birth – 3 monthsRapid colonization: Window of opportunity for microbial assembly. Diversity is fluctuatingEducation/expansion: Immune system begins learning to repel new bacterial strains. IgG/IgM are developingHigh activity: Synapse formation (synaptogenesis) is highly active. Myelination begins
Birth – 2 yearsAssembling/fluctuating: Gut microbiota is actively assembling. Microbial density is high but composition is unstableDeveloping: Natural killer cells are above adult levels. Key immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgA) are developing but not yet mature. T cell independent antibody response is immaturePeak proliferation (first 1000 days): Synapses intensely proliferate. Brain metabolism increases. Sensory pathways (vision, hearing) peak, and language develops rapidly
Year 2-3Stabilization phase: Composition begins to settle toward an adult-like stateTransition: Continues developing toward adult levels, including Th1 mediated immunityPruning begins: Synapses are pruned (eliminated). Metabolism decreases, and higher cognitive function development approaches its peak
Table 2 Strengths and limitations of animal models
Strengths
Limitations
Allow direct control of diet, microbes, and inflammatory triggersRodent neurodevelopmental timelines differ from humans
Enable mechanistic dissection of the gut-immune-brain axisNecrotizing enterocolitis and colitis models do not perfectly replicate human disease complexity
Permit invasive measurements: Cytokine profiling, neural imaging, electrophysiologyMicrobiome composition differs significantly between species
Facilitate genetic manipulation (e.g., knockout mice)Behavioral tests may not fully translate to human cognition or socio-emotional behavior
Allow testing of causal relationships via fecal microbiota transplantation, antibiotics, germ-free modelsArtificial induction of inflammation may exaggerate severity relative to human infants
Table 3 Summary of findings: Preterm Infants and necrotizing enterocolitis survivors
Ref.
Study type/follow-up age
Primary finding on NDI
Key associated deficits/brain pathology
Wang et al[133], 2024Systematic review and meta-analysis (corrected age > 12 months)Significant association between NEC and increased odds of NDI (adjusted odds ratio: 1.89).Increased risk of severe brain injury: IVH and PVL. Severity matters: Surgical NEC carries a higher NDI risk than medical NEC
Matei et al[132], 2020Systematic review and meta-analysis (n = 2403 NEC infants)High NDI incidence: 40% (median interquartile range 28%-64%). Severity correlates: NDI incidence is higher in surgical NEC (43%) vs medical NEC (27%)Most common NDI: Cerebral palsy (18%). NEC is associated with increased incidence of IVH and PVL compared to preterm controls
Mondal et al[134], 2021Retrospective cohort (average follow-up: 11.2 years)High burden: 61% of survivors had neurological impairmentCognitive impairment was the most common deficit (56%), followed by motor (33%). High rates of special education needs and learning difficulties
Roze et al[136], 2011Case-control cohort (mean age 9 years)Borderline or abnormal functional scores: Mean total intelligence quotient was lower (86 vs 97 in controls)Specific deficits in attention and visual perception. Children requiring surgery were at the highest risk for adverse outcomes
Shin et al[137], 2021Retrospective cohort (preterm infants with surgical NEC vs SIP)NEC group had more prevalent abnormal findings at 36 months in motor (gross and fine), cognitive, and social domains compared to SIP survivorsSlower head growth in surgical NEC group compared to SIP group
Arnold et al[135], 2010Retrospective cohort (long-term follow-up: 39 months)49% of long-term survivors had significant neurodevelopmental delayThe 20% had severe neurological deficits, including auditory and visual impairment. Highlights the ongoing morbidity risk
Hansen et al[138], 2019Historic cohort study (school age)Increased rates of abnormal behavioral scores and cerebral palsy observed, but differences were statistically insignificant after adjustment for confoundersProvides a counterpoint to the consensus, suggesting the long-term effects on behavioral and NDI scores may be moderate and of limited clinical importance
Table 4 The longitudinal human cohort studies linking the burden of early childhood enteric infections to long-term cognitive and neurodevelopmental deficits
Ref.
Population/cohort
Exposure
Key findings on learning, memory, and intelligence quotient
Niehaus et al[141], 2002 and Pinkerton et al[142], 2016Cohort of children from a Brazilian shantytown (followed to 5.6-12.7 years)ECD in the first 2 years of lifeECD is a significant inverse predictor of later childhood cognitive function (lower test of nonverbal intelligence and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition Coding scores). This effect was independent of malnutrition (stunting/wasting) and maternal education
MAL-ED Network Investigators[139], 2014Multi-site longitudinal birth cohortEnteropathogen infection causing intestinal inflammationEstablished the core study hypothesis: Enteropathogen infection leads to intestinal inflammation, which causes growth faltering and deficits in cognitive development
MAL-ED Network Investigators[140], 2018Longitudinal birth cohort in 6 low/middle-income countries (birth to 24 months)Higher rates of enteropathogen detection and days with illnessNegatively associated with lower cognitive scores at 24 months. Higher illness rates were linked to lower hemoglobin concentrations, which in turn predicted lower cognitive scores
Upadhyay et al[143], 2021low birth weight infants (North India)Increased number of diarrheal episodes in the first yearNegatively influenced composite scores in all three domains assessed: Cognitive, motor, and language at 12 months. Linear growth and diarrheal prevention are crucial factors
El Wakeel et al[144], 2022Malnourished, stunted children (Egypt, age 1-10 years)Intestinal inflammation (high fecal markers) and micronutrient deficiency (zinc, iron, vitamin D)Showed impaired neurocognitive and psychomotor functions. Cognitive performance was negatively correlated with both fecal and serum inflammatory markers
Streit et al[145], 2021Children (n = 380, age 45 months)Fecal microbiome profile (relative abundance of specific taxa)Microbiome profile was significantly associated with cognitive functioning (Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Third Edition scores). Found a strong inverse correlation between cognitive scores and a genus related to Enterobacter asburiae
Table 5 Summary of studies: Celiac disease and cognitive/neurological outcomes
Ref.
Study type/population
Key cognitive/symptomatic findings
Key structural/mechanistic findings
Effect of GFD
Edwards George et al[148], 2022Nationwide online survey (CD and NCGS patients)89% of CD and 95% of NCGS reported GINI (brain fog). Most common symptoms: Difficulty concentrating, forgetfulness, and grogginessHigh prevalence suggests GINI is a genuine and common symptom complexN/A (focus on symptoms after exposure)
Croall et al[149], 2020United Kingdom biobank (population-based cohort)Significant deficits in reaction time. Increased rates of self-reported anxiety and depressionWidespread white matter changes (increased axial diffusivity) observed via diffusion tensor imagingN/A (cross-sectional comparison)
Croall et al[153], 2020Pilot study (newly diagnosed vs established CD vs controls)Underperformed relative to controls in visual and verbal memory (established at diagnosis)Dysfunction appears established at the point of diagnosisCognitive deficit stabilizes but does not necessarily fully reverse, implying a benefit against further decline
Lichtwark et al[152], 2014Longitudinal pilot study (newly diagnosed CD, 12-month follow-up)Cognitive tests (verbal fluency, attention, motoric function) showed significant improvement over 12 monthsCognitive improvement strongly correlated with mucosal healing (Marsh score) and decreased tissue transglutaminase antibodiesImproved cognitive performance in parallel with resolution of intestinal inflammation
Casella et al[150], 2012Case-control study (elderly CD patients on GFD vs controls)Worse cognitive performance in CD patients despite long-term GFD, including lower scores on Mini Mental Test Examination, Semantic Fluency, and Digit Symbol TestEmphasizes the risk of irreversible effects from diagnostic delay and prolonged gluten exposureSuggests long-term GFD may not fully restore function if diagnosis is late
Hu et al[154], 2006Case series (patients with cognitive decline associated with CD)Presentation included amnesia, acalculia, and confusion. Average impairment was in the moderately impaired range. Ataxia common (10/13 patients)Frequent deficiencies in folate, vitamin B12, or vitamin E. Brain magnetic resonance imaging often showed non-specific white matter hyperintensitiesThree patients improved or stabilized cognitively with gluten withdrawal
Lanza et al[146], 2018 and Pennisi et al[147], 2017Review of neurophysiological studies (TMS, electroencephalography)Adult CD patients often report “brain fog” to overt dementiaEvidence suggests a profile of “hyperexcitable celiac brain” (measured by TMS) which is a feature also reported in degenerative/vascular dementiaHyperexcitability partially reverts back after long-term gluten restriction
Lebwohl et al[155], 2016Population-based cohort study (age $\geq$ 50 years)No increased overall risk for dementia in CD patients over the long termSubgroup analysis showed a non-significant trend for increased risk of vascular dementia (hazard ratio = 1.28) but not Alzheimer’sN/A (population risk analysis)
Beas et al[151], 2024Systematic review and meta-analysisConfirmed a significant association between CD and insomnia. Provided valuable insight into studies on cognitive impairmentN/A (meta-analysis of existing literature)N/A (meta-analysis)
Table 6 Summary of studies: Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and neurocognitive outcomes
Ref.
Population/condition
Key cognitive/functional findings
Key mechanistic/psychosocial findings
Implication/conclusion
Tadin Hadjina et al[157], 2019Adult IBD patients (n = 60) vs controlsImpaired neurocognitive and psychomotor function: Significantly longer total test-solving time in tests for convergent thinking, perceptive abilities, and complex operative thinkingDeficits in mental processing speed and mental enduranceIBD patients show objective impairment in cognitive and psychomotor speed, even in adulthood
Clarke et al[159], 2020Adult Crohn’s disease and UC patients in clinical remission (prospective)Impaired attentional performance was a stable feature of Crohn’s disease patients over a 6-month period (UC patients were unaffected)Consistently elevated plasma IL-6 and kynurenine-to-tryptophan ratio; blunted cortisol awakening response. No correlation between biochemical markers and cognitive impairment was found, but the markers indicated ongoing, subclinical inflammationImpaired cognitive function is a stable feature of Crohn’s disease, likely driven by persistent inflammatory/metabolic changes
Castaneda et al[158], 2013Adolescents with IBD (n = 34) vs peers with JIAIBD group, especially those in the acute phase, made more perseverative errors in the California Verbal Learning Test (verbal memory), suggesting executive function deficitsIBD group had more depressive symptoms than JIA group (especially with acute illness). Depressive symptoms were not related to the cognitive differenceAcute IBD may cause mild verbal memory/executive function problems; psychosocial burden (depression) is significant
Herzer et al[160], 2011Adolescents with IBD (n = 62) and their caregiversPoorer HRQOL across multiple dimensions (emotional, social, total HRQOL)Adolescent depressive symptoms fully mediated the relation between parent distress (illness-related stress) and the youth’s poorer HRQOLPsychosocial factors (parental distress-adolescent depression) are crucial targets for intervention to improve HRQOL
Friedman et al[161], 2020Children exposed to maternal IBD in utero (followed to 7 years)Children exposed to IBD in utero scored similarly to unexposed children on survey-based tools assessing motor and cognitive developmentNo obvious differences in language, motor, or cognitive/behavioral scores at 7 yearsReassuring data suggesting that maternal IBD exposure alone does not increase the risk of long-term neurodevelopmental delay
Table 7 Red flags for neurocognitive risk in gut disorder
Patient group
Gut-related red flag (trigger)
Actionable neurocognitive risk
Infancy/neonatalNecrotizing enterocolitis, especially requiring surgical interventionHigh risk (40% of global neurodevelopmental impairment, intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, and attention/executive function deficits
Infancy/early childhoodHigh burden of early severe enteric infections or chronic diarrheal illness (especially coupled with stunting/low growth)Long-term risk of Lower intelligence quotient/cognitive scores and poor school performance (independent of malnutrition)
Children/adolescentsActive or newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease (especially Crohn’s disease), even with mild symptomsDeficits in mental processing speed, executive function (attention, memory), and high comorbidity of depression/anxiety
All agesUnexplained chronic symptoms: Brain fog, memory lapse, severe fatigue, or new-onset psychiatric symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression)Possible underlying celiac disease, requiring assessment for cognitive stabilization and screening for white matter changes
Table 8 Clinical Recommendations for screening and monitoring in gut-brain axis-related disorders
Domain of assessment
Rationale for screening
Relevant population
Key clinical outcome measures
Cognitive functionTo identify deficits in processing speed, memory, and attention linked to systemic inflammation and micronutrient deficiencies (e.g., in IBD, CD)NEC survivors, chronic IBD (adolescents/adults), CDintelligence quotient tests (Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence/Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children), Reaction Time tests, Verbal/Visual Memory tests
Executive functionTo detect impairments in planning, attention, and cognitive flexibility, commonly seen in active IBD and linked to frontal lobe dysfunctionPediatric IBD (active disease), NEC survivors (attention deficits)Trail Making Test, Stroop Color-Word Test, tests for perseverative errors (California Verbal Learning Test)
Mood/affective statusTo address the high comorbidity of anxiety and depression in IBD and CD, which often mediates poor health-related quality of lifeAll chronic gastrointestinal patients (pediatric and adult)Beck depression inventory, state-trait anxiety inventory, generalized anxiety disorder scale
Inflammatory markersTo correlate inflammation with cognitive status and assess the therapeutic target (i.e., deep healing)IBD and CD patientsPlasma interleukin-6, fecal calprotectin, kynurenine-to-tryptophan ratio


Write to the Help Desk