Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Pediatr. Sep 9, 2025; 14(3): 108140
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i3.108140
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i3.108140
Table 1 Summary of systemic barriers and proposed solutions for the quality of pediatric emergency care
| Category | Key components |
| Quality indicators | |
| Timeliness of care | Door-to-doctor time: Influenced by hospital size, staffing, triage[9,10] |
| Time to treatment: Quick intervention improves survival[12] | |
| ED length of stay (LOS): It is an indicator of efficiency, and prolonged LOS could indicate ineffective therapy, bed shortages, or delayed diagnosis[13-15] | |
| Patient safety | Adverse events include medication errors, misdiagnosis, and procedural mistakes[16-18] |
| Root causes: Staff fatigue, poor communication, protocol non-adherence[20] | |
| Diagnostic accuracy | Trauma: High misdiagnosis risk (e.g., abdominal injuries)[11] |
| Sepsis: Early vague symptoms lead to delay[21] | |
| Respiratory issues: Misjudged severity impacts outcome[22] | |
| Patient & family satisfaction | Influenced by communication, environment, and provider interaction[23] |
| Family involvement improves satisfaction and treatment adherence[24] | |
| Systemic barriers | |
| Resource constraints | Lack of infrastructure[25,26] |
| Poor staffing | |
| Lack of pediatric emergency physicians and protocols | |
| Training gaps | Lack of specific pediatric training among ED practitioners |
| Outdated infrastructure | Outdated or ineffective infrastructure puts patient safety at risk and delays care[28] |
| Lack of integrated care systems leading to delays in inpatient admissions, specialist consultations, and diagnostic testing | |
| Proposed solutions | |
| Telemedicine | To provide real-time support to rural and remote areas[30] |
| Mobile units | Helpful to stabilize children before transfer to a specialized hospital or to offer on-site care |
| Training | Structured pediatric emergency care training to ED members[31] |
| Simulation-based trainings improve competence and confidence by enabling them to practice uncommon but crucial procedures under controlled conditions[33] | |
| Clinical protocols | Use of protocols is helpful to standardize clinical practices |
| Use in trauma/sepsis care has improved the outcome[32] | |
| Research networks | Help improve the global standards and diagnostic accuracy |
| PECARN: Helped to enhance the evidence-based practices for asthma, trauma, and sepsis | |
| Artificial intelligence | Assists with the identification of critical cases using data analytics |
| Promising early results in efficiency and safety | |
| Quality improvement efforts | Focus on clinical protocols, early warning systems, and symptom-based training |
| Effective in improving accuracy and reducing delays | |
| Leadership role | Pediatric leaders drive QI, staff training, and policy adherence |
| Leads to sustained pediatric care improvements | |
- Citation: Soni P, Agrawal A. Pediatric emergency care: Determinants and systematic barriers. World J Clin Pediatr 2025; 14(3): 108140
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v14/i3/108140.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v14.i3.108140
