Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Pediatr. Mar 9, 2025; 14(1): 100938
Published online Mar 9, 2025. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i1.100938
Table 1 Recommendations of pediatric guidelines regarding biologic use in inflammatory bowel disease
Characteristics
ECCO-ESPGHAN guidelines CD, 2020[13], UC, 2018[14,15]
Asian Pan-Pacific Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition PIBD Working Group, 2022[6]
Canadian association of Gastroenterology Guidelines, 2019[16]
Indications
CD
Upfront biologics for the following: (1) Extensive disease and deep colonic ulcers; (2) Perianal disease; (3) Stricturing or penetrating disease; and (4) Growth failureUpfront biologics if severe luminal or perianal diseaseUpfront biologics if severe luminal or perianal disease
As step-up therapy: Moderate to severe active CD not responding to conventional therapyStep-up approach: Moderate to severe active CD not responding to conventional therapyStep-up approach: Moderate to severe active CD not responding to conventional therapy
1st line: Infliximab, adalimumab; 2nd line: Ustekinumab1st line: Infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab - no consensus1st line: Iinfliximab, adalimumab; 2nd line: Ustekinumab; no consensus on vedolizumab
Indications
UC
Chronically active moderate to severe UC, not responding to conventional therapy; tofacitinib - no consensusChronically active moderate to severe UC, not responding to conventional therapyNA
ASUC if not responding to 5 days of intravenous steroidASUC if not responding to 5 days of intravenous steroid
1st line: Infliximab; 2nd line: Vedolizumab1st line: Infliximab; vedolizumab, tofacitinib - no consensus
Co-therapy with immune-modulatorInfliximab - consider combination therapy
Adalimumab - no
Infliximab and adalimumab - consider combination therapyInfliximab - NR (male), no recommendation for or against (female)
Adalimumab - NR (male), no recommendation for or against (female)
If considered, methotrexate for boys and thiopurine for girls
Screening before biologicHBV/HCV/HIVHBV/HCV/HIVHBV/HCV/HIV
TB: Mantoux or IGRA (BCG-vaccinated patients), chest X-ray, sputumTB: Mantoux and IGRA, chest X-ray, sputumTB: Mantoux or IGRA, chest X-ray, sputum
TDMYes, proactive preferredYes, reactiveYes, reactive
Target trough levelInfliximab: Induction (week 6) ≥ 15 μg/mL; maintenance ≥ 5 μg/mLInfliximab: Induction > 10-15 μg/mL; maintenance ≥ 3-7 μg/mLNA
Adalimumab: Induction (week 4) and maintenance ≥ 7.5 μg/mLAdalimumab: Maintenance ≥ 5-8 μg/mL
Table 2 Mechanism of action, drug doses, route of administration, efficacy and side effects of biologics in children with inflammatory bowel disease
Characteristics
Infliximab
Adalimumab
Ustekinumab
Vedolizumab
Tofacitinib
Mechanism of actionAnti-TNFα antibody (chimeric)Anti-TNFα antibody (humanized)Anti-IL-12/23 antibody (humanized)Anti-α4β7 integrin antibody (humanized)JAK inhibitor
RouteIV; SCbSCIV (1st dose) followed by SCIVOral
Dosea
Induction5mg/kg 2.4 mg/kg, f/b 12 mg/kg6 mg/kg if < 40 kg BW, 130 mg if > 40 kg BW6 mg/kg < 40 kg BW, 300 mg > 40 kg BW10 mg twice daily
Maintenance5mg/kg0.6 mg/kg2 mg/kg if < 40 kg BW, 90 mg if > 40 kg BWSame as induction dose5 mg twice daily
Schedulea
Induction0 week, 2 week, and 6 weeks0 week, and 2 weeks0 week0 week, 2 weeks, and 6 weeksDaily
Maintenance8 weekly2 weekly8 weekly8 weeklyDaily
Target drug levelInduction (week 6) ≥ 10-15 μg/mL; maintenance ≥ 5 μg/mLPost-induction before 3rd dose ≥ 7.5 μg/mL Target level not well definedTarget level not well definedNR
In patients at risk for accelerated drug clearance, target concentration ≥ 25 μg/mL at 2nd infusion and ≥ 15 μg/mL at 3rd infusion[13]Maintenance ≥ 7.5 μg/mL[13]
Adverse eventsInfection, reactivation of TB/ HBV; skin reaction (psoriasis)Infection; headache, arthralgia, skin reactionInfection; (GI most common), myalgiaInfection; (respiratory, GI); headache, myalgiaVaricella zoster infection, thrombosis, dyslipidemia, LFT, derangement
Use of concomitant immunomodulator (azathioprine/methotrexate)Yes (initial 6-12 months)If biological naive: No needNoNoNo
Biological exposed: Can add
Table 3 Summary of the pediatric studies on the efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab
Ref.CD
UC
Number of cases
Details of casesEfficacyAdverse eventNumber of cases
Details of casesEfficacyAdverse event
Age (years), mean ± SD/median age (years); IQR
Age (years), mean ± SD/ IQR
Infliximab
Hyams et al[21], REACH trial112Moderate to severeCRes and CR 89% and 59% at week 10; 63% and 56% at week 54th94.6% (serious 19.6%)----
13.3 ± 2.5
Crandall et al[23]22Fistulizing perianal disease, all biologic naiveResponse in 41% (9/22, partial response-4, complete response-5) at week 2nd; 73% (16/22, partial-1, complete-15) at week 54th95.7% (serious 4.5%)----
13.3 ± 2.5
Hyams et al[26]----52Moderate to severe, all biologic naiveCRes 27%: 6 months; CRes 38%: 12 months; CRes 21%: 24 monthsNone
13.3 ± 2.6
deBruyn et al[31]147Moderate to severe; all biologic naiveSFCR 59% at 1 year, 59.5% at 2 years5.4%
(serious 4.7%)
----
14.3; 12.1-15.1
Adalimumab
Hyams et al[30], IMAgINE trial188Moderate to severe, 44% infliximab exposedCR 33.5% at week 26th89% drug related 41% (serious 22.3%)----
13.6 ± 2.5
Croft et al[34], ENVISION I trial, high dose vs standard dose vs placebo----93Moderate to severe, all biologic-naiveEndoscopic remission at week 8th: High dose vs placebo-60% vs 20%, P = 0.0001; standard dose vs placebo-43% vs 20%, P = 0.3878% (serious 23%)
4-17At week 52th: High dose vs placebo: 45% vs 18%, P = 0.0001; standard dose vs placebo-29% vs 18%, P = 0.38)
deBruyn et al[31]147Moderate to severe; all biologic naiveSFCR: 63% at 1 year; 59% at 2 years1.3% (serious-none)-
13.4;11.6-14.9
Rinawi et al[114]65Moderate to severe, all biologic-naiveCR 60% at week 24thNA----
12.1; 10.5-13.8
Table 4 Summary of the studies on the efficacy of biosimilars in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease
Ref.BiosimilarPatient population
Control group
Main outcomes
Age (years), mean ± SD/median age (years); IQR
Age (years), mean ± SD/median age (years); IQR
Infliximab biosimilar
Sieczkowska-Golub et al[38], prospectiveCT-P1336 CD; 27 anti-TNF naiveNo86% CRes; 67% clinical remission at week 14
11.8 ± 4
Chanchlani et al[39], prospectiveInflectra and remsima82 (63 CD, 14 UC, 5 IBD-U)175 (148 CD, 33 UC, 15 IBD-U) children on originator infliximabClinical remission 79% for biosimilar and 68% for the originator at week 12
12; 10-1412; range 10-14
Nikkonen et al[40], retrospectiveCT-P1328 (16 CD, 3 UC, 9 IBD-U)23 (17 CD, 2 UC, 4 IBD-U) on originator infliximab90% CRes; no difference between the two groups at week 12
12; 4-1612.0; 5.4-1665% vs 61% patients on maintenance treatment at 1 year
Sieczkowska et al[41], prospectiveCT-P1339 (32 CD, 7 UC) elected to switchNo80% and 100% clinical remission at the last follow-up assessment (median 8 months) for CD and UC patients, respectively
CD: 11.1 ± 3.3; UC: 12.3 ± 2.3
Kang et al[42], prospectiveCT-P1338 (32 CD, 6 UC) elected to switch36 (28 CD, 8 UC) on originator infliximabClinical remission rate 77.8% and 78.9% for biosimilar and originator IFX at 1 year
17.5 ± 4.017.3 ± 3.4
Gianolio et al[45], retrospectiveIFX-SC7 CDNoAll (100%) remained in clinical remission at week 40
16.5 ± 0.8
Adalimumab biosimilar
Dipasquale et al[43], retrospectiveABP50141 (39 CD, 2 UC)NoClinical remission rate 70.7% at week 14 and 72% at week 52
13.6; 11.3-15.8
Table 5 Summary of the studies on the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab, ustekinumab and tofacitinib in children
Ref.
CD
UC
Number of cases
Details of casesEfficacyAdverse eventNumber of cases
Details of casesEfficacyAdverse event
Age (years), mean ± SD/median age (years); IQR
Age, (years) mean ± SD/median age (years); IQR
Vedolizumab
Singh et al[47], retrospective3087% anti TNFα agent exposedClinical remission 42% at week 1414.3%2295% anti TNFα agent exposedClinical remission 76% at week 14Nil
15.2; 7-1714.3; 7-17
Hyams et al[49], HUBBLE trail45Refractory to steroid, immunomodulator and/or anti-TNFα agents; biologic exposed 64%CRes 33%-63%; remission 16%-54% at week 1490% (serious 30%)44Refractory to steroid, immunomodulator and/or anti-TNFα agents; biologic exposed 34%CRes 40%-69%; remission 30%-60% at week 1482% (serious 22%)
2-172-17
Atia et al[50], VEDOKIDS65Refractory to steroid, immunomodulator and/or anti-TNFα agentsClinical remission 32% at week 1428% (none serious)77Refractory to steroid, immunomodulator and/or anti-TNFα agentsClinical remission 49% at week 1418% (none serious)
15 ± 2.314.2 ± 2.9
Fang et al[51], systematic review216Refractory to steroid, immunomodulator and/or anti-TNFα agentsClinical remission 18%-37% at week 14; 36%-57% at 1 yearserious
6%a
239Refractory to steroid, immunomodulator and/or anti-TNFα agentsClinical remission 31%-65% at week 14; 35%-54% at 1 yearSerious; 6%a
< 21< 21
Ustekinumab
Turner et al[53], UniStar study, Prospective34Moderate to severe CD, 94% anti-TNFα exposedClinical remission 41% at week 4888% (serious 14.7%)----
13; 12-16
Yerushalmy-Feler et al[54], ESPGHAN Porto group, retrospective6998.6% anti-TNFα exposedCRes 67% at week 12; remission 42% at week 128.7% (none serious)----
15.8; 13.8-16.9
Koudsi et al[55], GETAID, retrospective48All anti-TNFα exposedPCDAI reduced from 28.7 to 18.7 at week 1217%a5Refractory, all anti-TNFα exposedPUCAI 47 to 25 at week 1217%a
15.0; 8.7-1815.0; 8.7-18
Fang et al[56], systematic review204Refractory CD, 90% anti-TNFα exposedClinical remission 34% at week 8-16, 46% at 1 year3.5%a166Refractory UC, 86% anti TNFα exposedClinical remission 24% at week 8-16, 46% by 1 year3.5%a
Tofacitinib
Moore et al[57], retrospective----2120 exposed to infliximab, 9 to adalimumab, 2 to ustekinumab, 13 to vedolizumabCRes 43% at week 12; clinical remission 33% at week 12, 41% at week 5271% (serious 52%, possibly non-drug related)
18.4; 15-19.9
Ledder et al[58], retrospective----101All at least 1 biologic exposed; 36% exposed to 3 biologicsCRes 46% at week 8; clinical remission 16% at week 8, 23% at week 243% (herpes zoster, dyslipidemia)
12.8 ± 2.8
Table 6 Summary of the pediatric studies on the efficacy and safety of dual-biologic therapy
Ref.Number of cases
Details of caseMedications usedEfficacy-clinical remissionAdverse events
Median age (years); IQR
Dolinger et al[89], retrospective16 (CD 7, UC 9)All failed ≥ 2 biologicsVDZ + TOFA 9, VDZ + UST 4, UST + TOFA 375% at 6 months6.25% (arthritis, deep vein thrombosis)
15.9; 13.5-16.8
Wlazło et al[90], retrospective14 ( CD 4, UC 10)All failed single biologicUST + ADA 5, VDZ + ADA 5, IFX + VDZ 3, VDZ + ADA/UST + ADA-173% at 4 months7% (mild infection)
11.7; 3-17
Yerushalmy-Feler et al[91], retrospective62 (CD 35, UC 27)All failed 1 biologic, 76% failed ≥ 2 biologicsIFX + VDZ 18, IFX + UST 8, ADA + UST 11, ADA + VDZ 11, VDZ + UST 8, TOFA + IFX 2, TOFA + VDZ 135% at 3 months, 50% at 6 months, 63% at 1 year47% (7% serious, infection, thrombosis)
15.5; 13-16.8
Olbjørn et al[92], retrospective13 (9 CD, 4 UC)All failed anti-TNFα agentsIFX + VDZ 8 (4 CD, 4UC), IFX + UST 5 (all CD)IFX + VDZ, 75% remission at 6 months in UC, 25% in CD, IFX + UST 100% remission at 2 yearIFX + VDZ 2/8 (25%), IFX + UST 1/5 (20%)
8; 4-17.5
Goyal et al[93], retrospective9 children with CDAll failed anti-TNFα agentsIFX + VDZ + metho 1, IFX + anakinra 1, ADA + VDZ 1, ADA + VDZ+ PEN 1, ADA + VDZ + metho 3, UST + VDZ 2Complete response 45%, partial response 22% at 4 months3/9 (33%), skin infection, bleeding, fracture, unrelated
16; 8-19
Wlazlo et al[94], retrospective14 (CD 4, UC 10)All failed anti-TNFα agentsADA + VDZ 5, ADA + UST 6, IFX + VDZ 373% CRes by 4 monthsNot reported
11.7; 3-17