Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 10, 2013; 2(4): 176-180
Published online Nov 10, 2013. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v2.i4.176
Published online Nov 10, 2013. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v2.i4.176
Table 1 Anamnestic data and classification of the patients according to pelvic organ prolapse quantification system
| Age (yr) | 65.3 ± 8.2 (range 49-81) |
| Previous hysterectomy | 2 (6.7) |
| Menopausal | 28 (93.3) |
| Pre-menopausal | 2 (6.7) |
| Parity | 2.3 ± 0.9 (range 0-4) |
| Pelvic organ prolapse’s stage | |
| II | 7 (23.3) |
| III | 20 (66.6) |
| IV | 3 (10) |
- Citation: Gustapane S, Leombroni M, Falò E, Santarelli A, Frondaroli F, Liberati M, Perrone E, Tinelli A. Surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse and follow-up: An institutional multi-center experience. World J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2(4): 176-180
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6220/full/v2/i4/176.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v2.i4.176
