Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2016.
    
    
        World J Dermatol. Nov 2, 2016; 5(4): 129-135
Published online Nov 2, 2016. doi: 10.5314/wjd.v5.i4.129
Published online Nov 2, 2016. doi: 10.5314/wjd.v5.i4.129
            Table 1 Case study patient details
        
    | Patient ID | Treatment area | Age | BMI | Number of treatments | 
| VF-001 | Thighs, abdomen plus flanks | 28 | 23 | 6 | 
| VF-002 | Abdomen | 33 | 22 | 7 | 
| VF-003 | Abdomen | 44 | 26 | 6 | 
| VF-004 | Abdomen | 56 | 26 | 8 | 
| VF-005 | Abdomen | 31 | 26 | Dropped from the study | 
| VF-006 | Abdomen | 40 | 26 | 3 | 
| VF-007 | Abdomen and thighs | 23 | 25 | Dropped from the study | 
| VF-008 | Arms and abdomen | 70 | 31 | 8 | 
| VF-009 | Thighs | 34 | 25 | 3 | 
| VF-010 | Abdomen plus flanks | 61 | 27 | 5 | 
| VF-011 | Abdomen | 47 | 24 | 2 | 
| VF-012 | Thighs | 57 | 23 | 3 | 
| Average | 43.7 | 25.4 | 5.1 | |
| SD (±) | 14.1 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 
            Table 2 Skin impedance change post treatment (correlated to skin moisture level)
        
    | Patient ID | Treatment area | Skin moisture level (%) | Impedance (Ω) | ||||
| Initial | End | Change (%) | Initial | End | Change (%) | ||
| VF-001 | Abdomen | 38.9 | 48.4 | 20 | 156.4 | 123.5 | 21.0 | 
| VF-002 | Abdomen | 32.0 | 54.2 | 41 | 201.9 | 188.0 | 6.9 | 
| VF-003 | Abdomen | 39.6 | 46.1 | 14 | 139.1 | 114.6 | 17.6 | 
| VF-004 | Abdomen | 38.5 | 46.7 | 18 | 147.7 | 94.6 | 35.9 | 
| VF-005 | Abdomen | 38.9 | 48.4 | 20 | 143.9 | 97.0 | 32.6 | 
| VF-006 | Abdomen | 41.6 | 48.3 | 14 | 144.0 | 132.0 | 8.3 | 
| VF-007 | Abdomen | 38.9 | 48.4 | 20 | 144.2 | 104.2 | 27.7 | 
| VF-008 | Abdomen | 36.3 | 47.0 | 23 | 104.8 | 95.7 | 8.6 | 
| VF-009 | Thigh | 37.2 | 46.6 | 20 | 216.5 | 179.3 | 17.2 | 
| VF-010 | Abdomen | 40.0 | 56.3 | 29 | 114.3 | 110.0 | 3.8 | 
| Average | 38.2 | 49.0 | 21.7 | 151.3 | 123.9 | 18.0 | |
| SD (±) | 2.5 | 3.2 | 7.6 | 32.7 | 32.1 | 10.7 | |
            Table 3 All measurement points of circumferential reduction per treatment area, number of treatments and body mass index (each line represents a separate measurement point)
        
    | Area | Circumference measurement | Circumferential reduction (cm) | Circumferential reduction (%) | Number of treatments | BMI (kg/m2) | |
| Baseline (cm) | 4 wk post last treatment (cm) | |||||
| Thighs | 63 | 62.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 6 | 23 | 
| 58 | 58 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 64 | 63.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | |||
| 56 | 56 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 56.7 | 54.2 | 2.5 | 4.6 | 3 | 25 | |
| 52.5 | 51.4 | 1.1 | 2.1 | |||
| 40.4 | 39 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 3 | 23 | |
| 40 | 39.4 | 0.6 | 1.5 | |||
| Abdomen | 94 | 90 | 4 | 4.4 | 6 | 23 | 
| 71.5 | 71 | 0.5 | 0.7 | |||
| 92 | 90 | 2 | 2.2 | 4 | 27 | |
| 96 | 94 | 2 | 2.1 | |||
| 87 | 85 | 2 | 2.4 | |||
| 92 | 90.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 6 | 26 | |
| 93 | 95 | -2 | -2.1 | |||
| 87 | 86.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | |||
| 83 | 82 | 1 | 1.2 | 8 | 26 | |
| 91 | 87 | 4 | 4.6 | |||
| 101 | 95 | 6 | 6.3 | |||
| 112 | 100 | 12 | 12 | 5 | 31 | |
| 104 | 104 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 112 | 97 | 15 | 15.5 | 8 | 31 | |
| 104 | 96 | 8 | 8.3 | |||
| 92 | 89 | 3 | 3.4 | 5 | 27 | |
| 96 | 92.5 | 3.5 | 3.8 | |||
| 87 | 84 | 3 | 3.6 | |||
| Arms | 38 | 37 | 1 | 2.7 | 4 | 31 | 
| 36 | 34 | 2 | 5.9 | |||
| 38 | 35 | 3 | 8.6 | 8 | 31 | |
| 36 | 38 | -2 | -5.3 | |||
| 35 | 34 | 1 | 2.9 | 4 | 31 | |
| 35 | 36 | -1 | -2.8 | |||
| 35 | 33.2 | 1.8 | 5.4 | 8 | 31 | |
| 35 | 34 | 1 | 2.9 | |||
- Citation: Tagger C, Belenky I. Multi-channeling optimized radiofrequency energy: A new age in well-established radiofrequency technology. World J Dermatol 2016; 5(4): 129-135
 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6190/full/v5/i4/129.htm
 - DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5314/wjd.v5.i4.129
 
