Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2018; 9(9): 149-155
Published online Sep 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i9.149
Published online Sep 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i9.149
Table 1 Demographic data
Variable | Group I (patients with preoperative genu recurvatum),n = 32 knees | Group II (patients without preoperative genu recurvatum),n = 144 knees | P-value |
Age | 65.10 ± 8.02 (57-76) | 65.67 ± 7.40 (44-88) | 0.71 |
Sex, male/female | 1/31 | 14/130 | 0.31 |
Site, right/left | 16/17 | 70/74 | 0.91 |
BMI | 26.76 ± 3.69 (20.81-33.21) | 26.26 ± 3.05 (20-42.22) | 0.47 |
Knee score | 34.10 ± 2.47 (27-44) | 34.35 ± 2.62 (30-40) | 0.61 |
Pain score | 11.52 ± 4.42 (0-20) | 11.75 ± 4.94 (0-20) | 0.23 |
Functional score | 54.69 ± 9.75 (30-65) | 52.03 ± 10.13 (35-65) | 0.18 |
ROM (°) | 122.58 ± 4.17 (110-125) | 119.37 ± 10.92 (90-130) | 0.10 |
Tibiofemoral angle (°) | Varus 5.45 ± 3.86 (0-20) | Varus 5.68 ± 3.99 (0-15) | 0.77 |
Table 2 Pain score, knee score and functional score at 2-yr follow-up
Variable | Group I (patients with preoperative genu recurvatum),n = 32 knees | Group II (patients without preoperative genu recurvatum),n = 144 knees | P-value |
Knee score, points | 97.97 ± 2.49 (94-100) | 96.91 ± 4.44 (81-100) | 0.19 |
Pain score, points | 48.94 ± 2.36 (45-50) | 48.71 ± 2.63 (40-50) | 0.64 |
Functional score, points | 82.12 ± 4.85 (80-100) | 82.55 ± 5.10 (65-100) | 0.66 |
Table 3 Incidence of postoperative genu recurvatum and postoperative hyperextension angle
Variable | Group I (patients with preoperative genu recurvatum),n = 32 knees | Group II (patients without preoperative genu recurvatum),n = 144 knees | P-value |
Incidence of postoperative genu recurvatum (%) | 3.13 (1/32) | 0.69 (1/144) | 0.34 |
Hyperextension angle (°) | 2.40 ± 2.19 (1-7)) | 1.57 ± 3.51 (1-6) | 0.65 |
Table 4 Postoperative range of motion, component alignment, postoperative tibiofemoral angle and operative time
Variable | Group I (patients with preoperative genu recurvatum),n = 32 knees | Group II (patients without preoperative genu recurvatum),n = 144 knees | P-value |
Postoperative ROM (°) | 126.21 ± 5.30 (115-135) | 123.30 ± 9.88 (90-145) | 0.14 |
Postoperative tibiofemoral angle (°) | 5.82 ± 1.55 (valgus 3-valgus 8) | 5.66 ± 1.77 (valgus 2-valgus 10) | 0.65 |
Femoral component alignment (°) | 6.06 ± 1.43 (valgus 2-valgus 8) | 5.99 ± 1.56 (valgus 2-valgus 10) | 0.82 |
Tibia component alignment (°) | Varus 0.97 ± 0.92 (varus 3-valgus 1) | Varus 0.77 ± 1.19 (varus 3-valgus 2) | 0.37 |
Posterior slope of tibial component (°) | 6.73 ± 1.92 (4-10) | 6.31 ± 2.04 (2-10) | 0.28 |
Operative time in min | 88.94 ± 10.59 (75-120) | 93.01 ± 13.64 (65-130) | 0.11 |
- Citation: Pongcharoen B, Boontanapibul K. Outcomes of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in medial osteoarthritis knee with and without preoperative genu recurvatum. World J Orthop 2018; 9(9): 149-155
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v9/i9/149.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i9.149