Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2016; 7(3): 195-201
Published online Mar 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i3.195
Published online Mar 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i3.195
Bilateral | Unilateral | ||
Gender, No. of knees (%) | Male | 34 (36%) | 34 (36%) |
Female | 60 (64%) | 60 (64%) | |
Age at operation, mean (SD) range | 66 yr (8.2) | 65 yr (7.4) | |
45, 81 | 46, 80 | ||
Osteoarthritis grade, No. of knees (%) | KL 1 + 2 | 27 (29%) | 27 (29%) |
KL 3 + 4 | 67 (71%) | 67 (71%) | |
Alignment, mean (SD) range | Preoperative | 1.2 (5.3) | 1.3 (5.9) |
-16.3, 16.21 | -12.1, 21.81 | ||
Postoperative | 5.2 (3.0) | 4.9 (3.4) | |
-1.1, 12.81 | -11.2, 12.81 | ||
Operation year, No. of knees (%) | 2010 | 24 (26%) | 24 (26%) |
2011 | 62 (66%) | 62 (66%) | |
2012 | 8 (9%) | 8 (9%) |
SBTKA | UTKA | ||
PROM outcomes, mean (SD) range | OKS | 37.6 (9.0) | 36.1 (9.9) |
10, 48 | 9, 48 | ||
FJS | 59.9 (27.5) | 57.5 (28.8) | |
0, 100 | 0, 100 |
- Citation: Latifi R, Thomsen MG, Kallemose T, Husted H, Troelsen A. Knee awareness and functionality after simultaneous bilateral vs unilateral total knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2016; 7(3): 195-201
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v7/i3/195.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i3.195