Biotribology of artificial hip joints

doi:10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.77

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 6, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (21196)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-43) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

1336

WORD

413

HTML

16169

Figures (1-43)

724

Tables (1-5)

242

Sum=18884

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1255

Download

1059

Sum=2314

Jan 18, 2015 (publication date) through Jan 25, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (102)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Topic Highlight

World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2015; 6(1): 77-94
Published online Jan 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.77

Table 1 Geometrical characteristics of hip implants: head diameter D_h and diametrical clearance Cl

Head/cup	D_h (mm)	Cl (μm)
MoP	22.2-44	160-400
CoP	22.2-36	160-400
MoM	22.2-54	50-150
MoM_RHR	42-62	50-300
CoC	22.2-44	20-100

MoP: Metal on plastic; CoP: Ceramic on plastic; MoM_RHR: Metal on metal resurfacing; CoC: Ceramic on ceramic.

Table 2 Implant material properties: Young’s modulus E, Poisson’s ratio v and surface roughness R_a

Material		E (GPa)	n	R_a (μm)
P	UHMWPE	0.5-1	0.4	0.1-2
M	CoCrMo	230	0.3	0.01-0.05
C	Biolox delta	350	0.26	0.001-0.005

Table 3 Experimental estimations of coefficient of friction for different bearing types, obtained using 25% and 100% bovine serum as lubricants (test conditions: load range 0.1-2 kN, rotation ± 25°, frequency 1 Hz)[32,33]

Head/cup	COF 25% Bovine serum	COF 100% Bovine serum
MoP	0.062 (+ 0.008)	0.064 (± 0.01)
CoP	0.056 (+ 0.01)	0.06 (± 0.012)
MoM	0.12 (± 0.02)	0.096 (± 0.012)
MoM_RHR	0.098 (± 0.02)	0.079 (± 0.011)
CoC	0.04 (+ 0.007)	0.056 (± 0.01)

COF: Coefficient of friction; CoP: Ceramic on plastic; MoM_RHR: Metal on metal resurfacing; CoC: Ceramic on ceramic.

Table 4 Theoretical estimation of the lubrication regime according to equation (17)

Head/cup	h_min (μm)	R_a (μm)	λ	Lubricationregime
MoP	0.065-0.144 (0.105)	0.1-2	0.1-1	Boundary to Mixed
CoP	0.076-0.107 (0.092)	0.1-2	0.05-0.9	Boundary to Mixed
MoM	0.020-0.061 (0.041)	0.014-0.071	0.6-2.9	Boundary to Mixed
MoM_RHR	0.082-0.049 (0.066)	0.014-0.071	0.9-4.6	Boundary to Fluid-film
CoC	0.035-0.045 (0.04)	0.0014-0.0071	5.7-28.3	Fluid-film

The range of h_min is obtained considering two geometrical cases extracted from Table 1: minimum D_h combined with lowest Cl; maximum D_h combined with higher Cl. The averaged h_min reported in the bracket is used for calculating λ. Test case: W = 2 kN, ω = 2 rad/s, μ = 2.5 mPas.

Table 5 Typical wear rates reported in clinical studies (when available, the average value is indicated in the brackets)

Head/cup	h_clin (μm/Mc)	V_clin (mm³/Mc)
MoP	50-500 (50)	10-500 (80)
CoP	30-150	15-50
MoM (RI)	1-50	0.1-25
MoM (SS)	0.1-1	0.05-4
MoM_RHR (RI + SS)	0.2-10	0.2-2.9
MoM_RHR (ADT)	1.5-46	0.2-95
CoC	0.01-1	0.005-2

RI: Running-In; SS: Steady state; ADT: Adverse tissue reaction; 1 Mc: 10⁶ cycles.

Citation: Puccio FD, Mattei L. Biotribology of artificial hip joints. World J Orthop 2015; 6(1): 77-94
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i1/77.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.77