Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2012; 3(7): 95-100
Published online Jul 18, 2012. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i7.95
Published online Jul 18, 2012. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i7.95
Table 1 Paprosky classification system for acetabular defects[26]
| Description | ||||
| Type | Superior hip center migration | Is chialosteolysis | Kohler line | Teardrop |
| I | Minimal | None | Intact | Intact |
| IIA | Mild | Mild | Intact | Intact |
| IIB | Moderate | Mild | Intact | Intact |
| IIC | Mild | Mild | Disrupted | Moderate lysis |
| IIIA | Severe | Moderate | Intact | Moderate lysis |
| IIIB | Severe | Severe | Disrupted | Severe lysis |
Table 2 Reconstruction options for acetabular revision
| Acetabular revision option | Clinical pearls |
| Isolated liner exchange | The stability and orientation of the acetabular metal component should be confirmed at the time of revision, liner may be cemented if needed |
| Hemispheric porous-coated cup | May be used in conjunction with adjunct techniques of bone grafting, screw fixation recommended |
| Highly porous metal cup | Appears to be effective in achieving biologic fixation in cases of severe bone defects, augments may be used for structural support, cup-cage construct can be used to offload cup |
| Antiprotrusio cage | Useful in cases of severe bone defects or pelvic discontinuity, spans areas of healthy host bone and accommodates bone grafting deep to the cage, relies on mechanical fixation alone |
| Customized triflange implant | Requires several weeks or month to obtain implant, serves as a good salvage option in cases of catastrophic bone loss and discontinuity, may achieve biologic fixation |
- Citation: Taylor ED, Browne JA. Reconstruction options for acetabular revision. World J Orthop 2012; 3(7): 95-100
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v3/i7/95.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v3.i7.95
