Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2026; 17(6): 115692
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.115692
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.115692
Table 1 Normative ankle strength values and symmetry thresholds
| Parameter | Normative value (healthy adults) | Clinical interpretation |
| Peak torque - evertors/inverters | Approximately 88.8% balance | Indicates near-symmetrical agonist-antagonist strength |
| Peak torque - dorsiflexors/plantar flexors | Approximately 36.1% balance | Reflects expected ratio of ankle mobility vs power muscles |
| Limb symmetry index | ≥ 90% | Empirically validated threshold for return-to-activity considerations |
| Muscular deficiency index | ≥ 90% composite bilateral symmetry | Provides multi-metric bilateral assessment across torque/power/work |
| Gender differences | Men > women (all strength metrics) | Necessitates gender-specific normative charts |
- Citation: Byeon H. Letter to the Editor: Clinical impact of normative data in ankle strength evaluation. World J Orthop 2026; 17(6): 115692
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i6/115692.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i6.115692