Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Orthop. Aug 18, 2024; 15(8): 744-753
Published online Aug 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.744
Published online Aug 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.744
Table 1 Patient demographics
Item | n = 87 |
Age (years), mean (range) | 31.5 (12.0-62.0) |
Sex (male:female) | 60:27 |
Laterality (left:right) | 44:43 |
Graft type (hamstring:BTB) | 60:27 |
Height (cm), mean ± SD | 174.3 ± 8.8 |
Weight (kg), mean ± SD | 84.1 ± 18.0 |
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 27.5 ± 5.4 |
Table 2 Post-operative radiological parameters
Item | Median (inter-quartile range) |
Coronal position tibial tunnel (%) | 46.3 (42.7-49.6) |
Coronal angle tibial tunnel (º) | 70.8 (66.7-76.4) |
Coronal angle femoral tunnel (º) | 45.7 (39.8-52.0) |
Sagittal position tibial tunnel (%) | 44.8 (38.4-54.5) |
Transplant orientation to joint (º) | 68.3 (60.7-72.7) |
Position along Blumensaat’s line (%) | 47.2 (36.3-53.8) |
Angle of femoral tunnel to femur (º) | 38.9 (35.2-43.7) |
Table 3 Post-operative patient reported outcome measures data
Item | Median (inter-quartile range) |
KOOS pain | 89 (78-97) |
KOOS symptom | 79 (68-86) |
KOOS ADL | 97 (90-100) |
KOOS sport/rec | 75 (60-85) |
KOOS QoL | 63 (44-75) |
KOOS overall | 81 (70-87) |
IKDC | 75 (64-86) |
Lysholm | 87 (76-91) |
Tegner | 5 (4-7) |
EQ-5D index | 0.837 (0.728-1.000) |
EQ-5D VAS | 85 (70-90) |
SF-12 MCS | 53 (45-58) |
SF-12 PCS | 54 (47-57) |
Table 4 Comparison of post-operative patient reported outcome measures with EndoButton position
Anterior, median (IQR) | Middle, median (IQR) | Posterior, median (IQR) | P value1 | H | |
KOOS pain | 88 (73-97) | 85 (67-95) | 88 (82-91) | 0.748 | 0.6 |
KOOS symptom | 79 (68-89) | 79 (57-83) | 83 (68-88) | 0.612 | 1.0 |
KOOS ADL | 98 (87-100) | 92 (71-97) | 95 (92-96) | 0.227 | 3.0 |
KOOS sport/rec | 78 (61-85) | 73 (45-75) | 73 (51-75) | 0.393 | 1.9 |
KOOS QoL | 57 (25-80) | 56 (31-65) | 57 (40-69) | 0.820 | 0.4 |
KOOS overall | 81 (64-85) | 77 (59-82) | 79 (67-83) | 0.440 | 1.6 |
IKDC | 75 (53-77) | 69 (56-77) | 71 (64-72) | 0.664 | 0.8 |
Lysholm | 88 (71-94) | 85 (74-89) | 83 (74-89) | 0.722 | 0.7 |
Tegner | 5 (3-7) | 5 (3-7) | 4 (2-5) | 0.454 | 1.6 |
EQ-5D index | 1 (0.746-1.000) | 0.750 (0.657-0.919) | 0.704 (0.668-0.810) | 0.097 | 4.7 |
EQ-5D VAS | 74 (61-84) | 88 (64-91) | 73 (70-86) | 0.161 | 3.6 |
SF-12 MCS | 51 (47-59) | 54 (40-59) | 54 (37-58) | 0.964 | 0.1 |
SF-12 PCS | 55 (50-57) | 52 (35-56) | 46 (44-47) | 0.266 | 2.7 |
Table 5 Correlation between post-operative patient reported outcome measures and radiological parameters1
Coronal position TT | Coronal angle TT | Coronal angle FT | Sagittal position TT | TOJ | Position along Blumensaat’s line | Angle of FT to femur | EndoButton position | ||
KOOS pain | rho | 0.150 | -0.160 | 0.040 | 0.200 | 0.030 | 0.370 | 0.090 | -0.090 |
P value | 0.297 | 0.251 | 0.801 | 0.158 | 0.809 | 0.109 | 0.603 | 0.621 | |
KOOS symptom | rho | 0.030 | -0.150 | -0.030 | 0.210 | -0.050 | -0.050 | 0.060 | -0.050 |
P value | 0.828 | 0.285 | 0.818 | 0.127 | 0.709 | 0.823 | 0.736 | 0.778 | |
KOOS ADL | rho | 0.093 | -0.140 | 0.190 | 0.200 | -0.060 | 0.140 | -0.150 | -0.240 |
P value | 0.507 | 0.317 | 0.178 | 0.150 | 0.688 | 0.548 | 0.410 | 0.170 | |
KOOS sport/rec | rho | 0.110 | -0.040 | 0.200 | 0.120 | 0.010 | 0.320 | 0.030 | -0.220 |
P value | 0.436 | 0.771 | 0.166 | 0.410 | 0.944 | 0.190 | 0.864 | 0.220 | |
KOOS QoL | rho | 0.230 | -0.110 | 0.200 | 0.430 | -0.200 | 0.080 | 0.010 | -0.020 |
P value | 0.097 | 0.441 | 0.147 | 0.002a | 0.157 | 0.735 | 0.956 | 0.928 | |
KOOS overall | rho | 0.170 | -0.040 | 0.160 | 0.250 | -0.090 | 0.230 | 0.020 | -0.140 |
P value | 0.220 | 0.757 | 0.255 | 0.080 | 0.551 | 0.344 | 0.919 | 0.423 | |
IKDC | rho | 0.180 | -0.100 | 0.150 | 0.260 | 0.070 | 0.260 | 0.170 | -0.160 |
P value | 0.202 | 0.517 | 0.288 | 0.060 | 0.635 | 0.268 | 0.358 | 0.381 | |
Lysholm | rho | 0.010 | -0.210 | -0.110 | 0.200 | -0.020 | 0.290 | 0.290 | -0.140 |
P value | 0.921 | 0.139 | 0.446 | 0.166 | 0.898 | 0.232 | 0.105 | 0.453 | |
Tegner | rho | -0.040 | 0.200 | -0.020 | 0.200 | 0.140 | 0.130 | 0.130 | -0.180 |
P value | 0.766 | 0.178 | 0.913 | 0.900 | 0.333 | 0.582 | 0.500 | 0.355 | |
EQ-5D index | rho | 0.060 | -0.150 | -0.010 | 0.260 | -0.100 | 0.310 | 0.070 | -0.380 |
P value | 0.659 | 0.285 | 0.933 | 0.068 | 0.491 | 0.192 | 0.698 | 0.028a | |
EQ-5D VAS | rho | 0.030 | 0.020 | -0.080 | 0.360 | -0.180 | 0.010 | 0.130 | 0.240 |
P value | 0.820 | 0.891 | 0.566 | 0.010a | 0.213 | 0.962 | 0.461 | 0.174 | |
SF-12 MCS | rho | 0.000 | -0.140 | -0.070 | 0.110 | -0.010 | 0.110 | 0.040 | 0.050 |
P value | 0.999 | 0.339 | 0.650 | 0.459 | 0.956 | 0.641 | 0.822 | 0.797 | |
SF-12 PCS | rho | 0.170 | -0.110 | 0.120 | 0.220 | -0.100 | 0.290 | -0.070 | -0.280 |
P value | 0.244 | 0.467 | 0.405 | 0.144 | 0.524 | 0.223 | 0.732 | 0.129 |
- Citation: Mann O, Al-Dadah O. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Effect of graft tunnel position on early to mid-term clinical outcomes. World J Orthop 2024; 15(8): 744-753
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v15/i8/744.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.744