Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2024; 15(6): 547-553
Published online Jun 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.547
Table 1 Demographics and meniscal tear characteristics in the study population
Surgical demographic

Age at time of surgery
    Mean (SD)14 (2.4)
    Range6-16
Gender, n (%)
    Male37 (67)
    Female22 (33)
Operative side, n (%)
    Right37 (56)
    Left29 (44)
Meniscal side, n (%)
    Medial32 (48)
    Lateral34 (52)
Tear type, n (%)
    Longitudinal41 (62)
    Bucket handle14 (21)
    Horizontal6 (9)
    Complex5 (8)
Tear location, n (%)
    Red-red59 (89)
    Red-white6 (9)
    White-white1 (2)
Table 2 Characteristics of failed meniscal repair cases
Age/genderSideMedial/lateralTear typeTear locationMeniscal zoneAssociated ACL reconstructionFurther surgery
114/FLeftMedialLongitudinalPosterior hornRed-WhiteNoPartial meniscectomy
211/M
LeftLateralLongitudinalPosterior hornRedYesMeniscal repair
315/FLeftMedialLongitudinalPosteriorRedNoMeniscal repair
415/MRightLateral Bucket handlePosterior to anteriorRed-WhiteNoPartial meniscectomy
515/MLeftLateralLongitudinalBodyRedNoPartial meniscectomy
615/MRightMedialLongitudinalPosterior RedNoPartial meniscectomy
713/MRightMedialBucket handlePosterior to anteriorRed-WhiteNoPartial meniscectomy
86/FRightLateralBucket handlePosterior to anteriorRedNoPartial meniscectomy
914/MLeftLateralBucket handlePosterior to anteriorRedNoPartial meniscectomy
1014/MRightLateralBucket handlePosterior to anteriorRedNoPartial meniscectomy
1113/FLeft MedialBucket handlePosterior to anteriorRedNoPartial meniscectomy
Table 3 Patient reported outcome measures in patients with success meniscal repair compared to patients with failure of the meniscal repair
PROMs at final follow up (mean)
Successful meniscal repair group (55 cases)
Failed meniscal repair group (11 cases)
Tegner (range)7 (2-10)6 (2-9)
Lysholm (range)94 (66-100)88 (57-96)
IKDC (range)90 (46-100)86 (44-100)