Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis: A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes

doi:10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.444

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 5

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (1852)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

887

Figures (1-1)

126

Tables (1-6)

135

Sum=1225

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

124

Download

191

Sum=315

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

180

Sum=239

May 18, 2024 (publication date) through Nov 28, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Orthop. May 18, 2024; 15(5): 444-456
Published online May 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.444

Table 1 Demographics

	UKA group (n = 23)	HTO group (n = 19)
Age (years), mean (SD)	66.9 (8.6)	54.3 (10.8)
Sex (male:female)	12:11	18:1
Laterality (left:right)	15:8	11:8
Smoking, n (%)	1 (4.5)	1 (5.6)
Height (cm), mean (SD)	167.1 (10.0)	174.2 (9.1)
Weight (kg), mean (SD)	84.2 (18.4)	95.6 (16.8)
BMI (kg/m²), mean (SD)	30.0 (4.6)	31.5 (4.8)
ASA, median (range)	2 (1 to 3)	2 (1 to 2)
SCQ, median (range)	3.5 (0 to 12)	3 (0 to 10)

UKA: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; HTO: High tibial osteotomy; BMI: Body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System; SCQ: Self-administered co-morbidity questionnaire.

Table 2 Between-group comparison of preoperative and postoperative patient reported outcome measures scores

	Preoperative				Postoperative
	UKA group mean (SD)	HTO group mean (SD)	P value¹	95%CI	UKA group mean (SD)	HTO group mean (SD)	P value¹	95%CI
KOOS:
Pain	32.5 (8.2)	35.2 (17.7)	0.530	-5.8 to 11.1	91.1 (12.7)	87.2 (12.4)	0.419	-13.5 to 5.8
Symptoms	42.3 (17.8)	38.2 (17.8)	0.462	-15.2 to 7.1	87.0 (12.9)	73.0 (17.3)	0.012^a	-24.6 to -3.3
ADLs	38.0 (9.1)	42.2 (17.3)	0.320	-4.2 to 12.6	90.6 (13.9)	90.2 (10.8)	0.936	-9.8 to 9.1
Sport/Rec	19.0 (21.3)	14.4 (12.4)	0.455	-16.9 to 7.7	78.7 (28.9)	71.8 (27.6)	0.549	-30.1 to 16.4
QoL	17.8 (11.9)	13.0 (11.9)	0.211	-12.5 to 2.9	80.1 (21.8)	67.8 (14.8)	0.107	-27.4 to 2.8
Overall	29.1 (7.9)	27.1 (13.1)	0.580	-9.3 to 5.3	85.2 (17.3)	78.4 (13.6)	0.295	-19.8 to 6.3
OKS	16.5 (5.6)	18.4 (7.8)	0.362	-2.3 to 6.1	42.4 (6.3)	42.1 (5.2)	0.872	-4.7 to 4.0
EQ-5D^Index	35.6 (24.0)	37.4 (29.7)	0.834	-15.4 to 19.0	84.7 (18.8)	80.8 (15.1)	0.557	-17.4 to 9.6
EQ-5D^VAS	72.4 (17.6)	64.8 (23.4)	0.237	-20.4 to 5.2	88.3 (12.7)	82.9 (9.6)	0.210	-14.0 to 3.2
SF-12 PCS	28.9 (5.8)	32.1 (7.7)	0.143	-1.1 to 7.5	50.9 (7.7)	50.0 (8.9)	0.983	-7.4 to 5.5
SF-12 MCS	51.0 (11.4)	42.9 (13.0)	0.043^a	-15.9 to -0.3	51.8 (9.7)	50.8 (10.5)	0.511	-8.8 to 6.9

¹Independent-sample Student’s t-test.

^aP < 0.05, statistically significant.

SD: Standard deviation; UKA: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; HTO: High tibial osteotomy; PROM: Patient reported outcome measures; KOOS: Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score; ADL: Activities of daily living; Sport/Rec: Sport and recreation; QoL: Quality of life ; OKS: Oxford knee score; EQ-5D^index: EuroQol–5 dimension descriptive component; EQ-5D^vas: EuroQol–5 dimension visual analogue scale; SF-12 PCS: 12 item Short Form survey physical component score; SF-12 MCS: 12 item Short Form survey mental component score.

Table 3 Within-group comparison of preoperative vs postoperative patient reported outcome measures scores

	UKA Group				HTO Group
	Pre-op mean (SD)	Post-op mean (SD)	P value¹	95%CI	Pre-op mean (SD)	Post-op mean (SD)	P value¹	95%CI
KOOS:
Pain	32.5 (8.2)	91.1 (12.7)	< 0.001^a	51.8 to 63.3	35.2 (17.7)	87.2 (12.4)	< 0.001^a	37.5 to 63.0
Symptoms	42.3 (17.8)	87.0 (12.9)	< 0.001^a	37.3 to 52.1	38.2 (17.8)	73.0 (17.3)	< 0.001^a	25.7 to 49.5
ADLs	38.0 (9.1)	90.6 (13.9)	< 0.001^a	47.6 to 57.1	42.2 (17.3)	90.2 (10.8)	< 0.001^a	32.9 to 53.9
Sport/Rec	19.0 (21.3)	78.7 (28.9)	< 0.001^a	44.9 to 76.5	14.4 (12.4)	71.8 (27.6)	< 0.001^a	39.7 to 71.2
QoL	17.8 (11.9)	80.1 (21.8)	< 0.001^a	53.9 to 71.6	13.0 (11.9)	67.8 (14.8)	< 0.001^a	40.9 to 62.6
Overall	29.1 (7.9)	85.2 (17.3)	<0.001^a	47.8 to 63.6	27.1 (13.1)	78.4 (13.6)	< 0.001^a	37.7 to 58.1
OKS	16.5 (5.6)	42.4 (6.3)	< 0.001^a	23.0 to 28.6	18.4 (7.8)	42.1 (5.2)	< 0.001^a	16.4 to 27.8
EQ-5D^Index	35.6 (24.0)	84.7 (18.8)	< 0.001^a	38.8 to 57.2	37.4 (29.7)	80.8 (15.11)	< 0.001^a	23.8 to 48.9
EQ-5D^VAS	72.4 (17.6)	88.3 (12.7)	< 0.001^a	8.6 to 23.0	64.8 (23.4)	82.9 (9.6)	0.069	-1.2 to 27.0
SF-12 PCS	28.9 (5.8)	50.9 (7.7)	< 0.001^a	16.3 to 25.4	32.1 (7.7)	50.0 (8.9)	0.001^a	9.1 to 25.8
SF-12 MCS	51.0 (11.4)	51.8 (9.7)	0.476	-3.0 to 6.2	42.9 (13.0)	50.8 (10.5)	0.115	-1.8 to 14.1

¹Paired Student’s t-test.

^aP < 0.05, statistically significant.

SD: Standard deviation; UKA: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; HTO: High tibial osteotomy; Pre-op: Preoperative; Post-op: Postoperative; PROM: Patient reported outcome measures; KOOS: Knee Injury and osteoarthritis outcome score; ADL: Activities of daily living; Sport/Rec: Sport & recreation; QoL: Quality of life; OKS: Oxford knee score; EQ-5D^index: EuroQol–5 dimension descriptive component; EQ-5D^vas: EuroQol–5 dimension visual analogue scale; SF-12 PCS: 12 item Short Form survey physical component score; SF-12 MCS: 12 item Short Form survey mental component score.

Table 4 Correlation analysis: Preoperative radiographic parameters and preoperative patient reported outcome measures

	Angle of Mikulicz line	HKA	MAD
	r (P value¹)	r (P value¹)	r (P value¹)
KOOS:
Pain	-0.18 (0.290)	-0.12 (0.484)	-0.01 (0.938)
Symptoms	-0.36 (0.022^a)	0.15 (0.352)	0.16 (0.336)
ADLs	-0.37 (0.020^a)	0.06 (0.707)	0.10 (0.534)
Sport/Rec	-0.04 (0.839)	0.06 (0.737)	0.16 (0.357)
QoL	-0.34 (0.040^a)	-0.23 (0.169)	-0.14 (0.415)
Overall	-0.38 (0.026^a)	-0.04 (0.844)	0.07 (0.698
OKS	-0.41 (0.010^a)	0.13 (0.422)	0.21 (0.201)
EQ-5D^Index	-0.45 (0.005^a)	-0.07 (0.670)	-0.02 (0.896)
EQ-5D^VAS	-0.29 (0.071)	0.03 (0.843)	0.06 (0.709)
SF-12 PCS	-0.23 (0.158)	0.26 (0.112)	0.34 (0.035^a)
SF-12 MCS	-0.23 (0.173)	-0.05 (0.773)	-0.08 (0.641)

¹Pearson’s product-moment correlation analysis.

^aP < 0.05, statistically significant.

r: Correlation co-efficient; UKA: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; HTO: High tibial osteotomy; PROM: Patient reported outcome measures; HKA: Hip knee ankle angle; MAD: Mechanical axis deviation; KOOS: Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score; ADL: Activities of daily living; Sport/Rec: Sport & recreation; QoL: Quality of life; OKS: Oxford knee score; EQ-5D^index: EuroQol–5 dimension descriptive component; EQ-5D^vas: EuroQol–5 dimension visual analogue scale; SF-12 PCS: 12 item Short Form survey physical component score; SF-12 MCS: 12 item Short Form survey mental component score.

Table 5 Correlation analysis: Post-operative radiographic parameters and post-operative patient reported outcome measures

	UKA Group			HTO Group
	Angle of Mikulicz line, r (P value¹)	HKA, r (P value¹)	MAD, r (P-value¹)	Angle of Mikulicz line, r (P-value¹)	HKA, r (P-value¹)	MAD, r (P-value¹)
KOOS:
Pain	-0.17 (0.483)	-0.15 (0.518)	-0.07 (0.760)	0.13 (0.716)	0.41 (0.238)	0.53 (0.119)
Symptoms	-0.17 (0.450)	-0.07 (0.772)	0.02 (0.922)	0.26 (0.436)	0.65 (0.032^a)	0.62 (0.040^a)
ADLs	-0.22 (0.328)	-0.05 (0.837)	0.01 (0.961)	0.09 (0.790)	0.59 (0.055)	0.62 (0.041^a)
Sport/Rec	-0.21 (0.459)	0.15 (0.584)	0.28 (0.317)	0.46 (0.178)	0.5 (0.103)	0.53 (0.113)
QoL	-0.27 (0.249)	-0.11 (0.635)	-0.03 (0.898)	0.14 (0.693)	0.58 (0.080)	0.60 (0.065)
Overall	-0.26 (0.357)	-0.01 (0.959)	0.12 (0.676)	0.32 (0.373)	0.65 (0.041^a)	0.68 (0.031^a)
OKS	-0.34 (0.137)	-0.02 (0.950)	0.03 (0.884)	0.24 (0.481)	0.65 (0.032^a)	0.61 (0.045^a)
EQ-5D^Index	-0.23 (0.334)	-0.70 (0.768)	0.01 (0.974)	-0.13 (0.724)	0.47 (0.175)	0.45 (0.191)
EQ-5D^VAS	-0.23 (0.304)	-0.02 (0.942)	0.03 (0.881)	0.10 (0.776)	0.21 (0.534)	0.21 (0.544)
SF-12 PCS	-0.14 (0.584)	-0.13 (0.615)	-0.02 (0.929)	-0.07 (0.850)	0.15 (0.680)	0.18 (0.616)
SF-12 MCS	-0.49 (0.041^a)	-0.24 (0.341)	-0.19 (0.455)	-0.02 (0.953)	0.38 (0.279)	0.29 (0.422)

¹Pearson’s product-moment correlation analysis.

^aP < 0.05, statistically significant.

r: Correlation co-efficient; UKA: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; HTO: High tibial osteotomy; PROM: Patient reported outcome measures; HKA: Hip knee ankle angle; MAD: Mechanical axis deviation; KOOS: Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score; ADL: Activities of daily living; Sport/Rec: Sport & recreation; QoL: Quality of Life; OKS: Oxford knee score; EQ-5D^index: EuroQol–5 dimension descriptive component; EQ-5D^vas: EuroQol–5 dimension visual analogue scale; SF-12 PCS: 12 Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Score; SF-12 MCS: 12 Item Short Form survey mental component score.

Table 6 Within-group comparison of preoperative vs post-operative radiographic parameters of joint alignment

	UKA Group				HTO Group
	Pre-op mean (SD)	Post-op mean (SD)	P value¹	95%CI	Pre-op mean (SD)	Post-op mean (SD)	P value¹	95%CI
Angle of Mikulicz line (°)	0.3 (2.6)	-0.2 (1.8)	0.326	-1.6 to 0.6	0.7 (2.0)	0.2 (1.5)	0.951	-1.5 to 1.6
HKA (°)	174.5 (2.7)	180.2 (3.3)	< 0.001^a	4.3 to 7.1	173.9 (4.0)	182.5 (2.8)	< 0.001^a	5.2 to 12.0
MAD (%)	23.5 (10.8)	48.9 (13.6)	< 0.001^a	20.7 to 30.0	22.3 (14.5)	59.9 (12.0)	< 0.001^a	24.2 to 51.0

¹Paired Student’s t-test.

^aP < 0.05, statistically significant.

SD: Standard deviation; UKA: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; HTO: High tibial osteotomy; Pre-op: Preoperative; Post-op: Postoperative; HKA: Hip knee ankle angle; MAD: Mechanical axis deviation.

Citation: Wyatt FW, Al-Dadah O. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis: A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes. World J Orthop 2024; 15(5): 444-456
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v15/i5/444.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.444