Cost-effectiveness of patient specific vs conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 1 Included articles and article attributes

Ref.	Country of conduction	Study design	Studied TKA types	Type of economic analysis
Attard et al[44], 2019	United Kingdom	RCT	PSI TKA vs CI TKA vs Single use inserts for TKA	Financial study
Barrack et al[31], 2012	United States	Retrospective	PSI TKA vs CI TKA	Financial study
Cotter et al[42], 2022	United States	Retrospective	CI TKA vs other1 TKA	Financial study
Dakin et al[43], 2012	United Kingdom	Retrospective RCT-analysis	CI TKA	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Dakin et al[33], 2020	United Kingdom	Retrospective	CI TKA vs Total hip arthroplasty	Cost-effectiveness analysis
DeHaan et al[49], 2014	United States	Retrospective	PSI TKA vs CI	Financial study
Elmallah et al[29], 2017	United States	Retrospective comparative cohort	CI TKA vs Total hip arthroplasty	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Goldberg et al[30], 2019	United States	Retrospective	CI TKA vs other TKA	Financial decision model
Jenkins et al[32], 2013	United Kingdom	Prospective	CI TKA vs Total hip arthroplasty	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Konopka et al[37], 2018	United States	Retrospective	CI TKA vs Total hip arthroplasty	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Krummenauer et al[35], 2009	Germany	Prospective	CI TKA	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Lionberger et al[27], 2014	United States	RCT	PSI TKA vs CI TKA	Financial study
Losina et al[46], 2009	United States	Retrospective population analysis	CI TKA	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Moerenhout et al[36], 2021	Switzerland	Case control, retrospective chart	PSI TKA vs CI TKA	Financial study
Mont et al[48], 2012	United States	Prospective controlled trial	CI TKA vs other TKA	Financial study
Navarro Espigares and Hernández Torres[47], 2008	Spain	Prospective cohort	CI TKA vs Total hip arthroplasty	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Nunley et al[11], 2012	United States	Retrospective	PSI TKA vs CI TKA	Financial study
Peersman et al[53], 2014	Belgium	Retrospective	CI TKA vs other TKA	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Räsänen et al[45], 2007	Finland	Prospective	CI TKA vs Total hip arthroplasty	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Rorabeck and Murray[50], 1996	Canada	Retrospective	CI TKA	Financial study
Schilling et al[28], 2017	Australia	Retrospective	CI TKA	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Siegel et al[40], 2015	United States	Retrospective	CI TKA vs other TKA	Financial study
Slover et al[54], 2006	United States	Theoretical cohort	CI TKA vs other TKA	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Slover et al[12], 2012	United States	Retrospective	PSI TKA vs CI TKA	Financial decision model
Stan et al[34], 2015	Romania	Retrospective	CI TKA vs other TKA	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Teeter et al[38], 2019	Canada	RCT	PSI TKA vs CI TKA	Financial study
Thienpont et al[41], 2015	Belgium	Retrospective	PSI TKA vs CI TKA	Financial study
Thomas et al[56], 2022	United States	Retrospective	PSI TKA vs CI TKA	Financial study
Tibesku et al[51], 2013	Germany	Retrospective	PSI TKA vs CI TKA	Financial study
Waimann et al[39], 2014	United States	Prospective	CI TKA	Cost-effectiveness analysis
Watters et al[52], 2011	United States	Retrospective	PSI TKA vs CI TKA	Financial study
Xie et al[55], 2010	Singapore	Non-randomized prospective observational cohort	CI TKA vs other TKA	Cost-effectiveness analysis

¹Other type of total Knee arthroplasty (TKA) includes robot-assisted, unicondylar or single-use TKA.

PSI: Patient specific instrumentation; CI: Conventional instrumentation; TKA: Total knee arthroplasty; RCT: Randomised controlled trial.