Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2022; 13(9): 825-836
Published online Sep 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i9.825
Published online Sep 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i9.825
Table 1 Included randomized controlled trials with characteristics
| First author (last name) | Journal | Year | Comparison | Patients enrolled | Patients lost to follow up | Final study, n | JADAD score | Power analysis |
| Kim | J Orthop Trauma | 2015 | ORPO (LCP) vs MIPO | 72 | 4 | 68 | 3 | Yes |
| Esmailiejah | Trauma Mon | 2015 | ORPO (DCP) vs MIPO | 68 | 3 | 65 | 3 | No |
| Fan | Orthopedics | 2015 | ORPO (LCP) vs IMN | 60 | 0 | 60 | 2 | Yes |
| Hadhoud | Menoufia Medical Journal | 2015 | ORPO (LCP) vs MIPO | 30 | 0 | 30 | 2 | No |
| Wali | Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr | 2014 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 50 | 0 | 50 | 2 | No |
| Benegas | J Shoulder Elbow Surg | 2014 | MIPO vs IMN | 41 | 1 | 40 | 3 | Yes |
| Lian | Orthopedics | 2013 | MIPO vs IMN | 56 | 9 | 47 | 3 | No |
| Li | J Shoulder Elbow Surg | 2011 | ORPO (LCP) vs IMN | 50 | 5 | 45 | 3 | Yes |
| Iqbal | Annals of King Edward Medical University | 2011 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 40 | 0 | 40 | 3 | No |
| Singisetti | Int Orthop | 2010 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 45 | 9 | 36 | 1 | No |
| Putti | J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) | 2009 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 34 | 0 | 34 | 2 | No |
| Changulani | Int Orthop | 2007 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 47 | 2 | 45 | 3 | No |
| Kesemenli | Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc | 2003 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 60 | 0 | 60 | 2 | No |
| McCormack | J Bone Joint Surg (Br) | 2000 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 44 | 3 | 41 | 2 | No |
| Chapman | J Orthop Trauma | 2000 | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 89 | 5 | 84 | 3 | No |
Table 2 Summary characteristics of included randomized controlled trials
| Characteristic | No. | % or range |
| Initial sample size, mean No. | 52.4 | (30-89) |
| Lost to follow up, mean No. | 2.7 | (0-9) |
| Final sample size, mean No. | 49.7 | (30-84) |
| Power analysis | 4 | 26.7% |
| Comparison groups | ||
| ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 8 | 53.3% |
| ORPO (LCP) vs IMN | 2 | 13.3% |
| MIPO vs IMN | 2 | 13.3% |
| ORPO (LCP) vs MIPO | 2 | 13.3% |
| ORPO (DCP) vs MIPO | 1 | 6.7% |
| Outcome assessed | ||
| Delayed union/nonunion | 15 | 100.0% |
| Iatrogenic radial nerve palsy | 15 | 100.0% |
| Infection | 14 | 93.3% |
| Secondary surgeries | 11 | 73.3% |
| Shoulder impingement | 10 | 66.7% |
| Malunion | 7 | 46.7% |
| Elbow stiffness | 4 | 26.7% |
Table 3 Fragility index values for each outcome for included randomized controlled trials
| First author (last name) | Comparison | Delayed union/ Nonunion | Iatrogenic radial nerve palsy | Infection | Malunion | Shoulder Impingement | Elbow Stiffness | All complications | Secondary surgeries |
| Kim | ORPO (LCP) vs MIPO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Esmailiejah | ORPO (DCP) vs MIPO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Fan | ORPO (LCP) vs IMN | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0 | NA |
| Hadhoud | ORPO (LCP) vs MIPO | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 0 | NA |
| Wali | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Benegas | MIPO vs IMN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Lian | MIPO vs IMN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | NA |
| Li | ORPO (LCP) vs IMN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | NA | NA | 0 | NA |
| Iqbal | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Singisetti | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Putti | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Changulani | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Kesemenli | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 0 | 1 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| McCormack | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | NA | 6 | 1 |
| Chapman | ORPO (DCP) vs IMN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Table 4 Summary of outcomes with reported differences between groups
| Continuous variable | Superior treatment | Inferior treatment | First author (last name) |
| Time to union | IMN | ORPO | Changulani |
| Time to union | IMN | ORPO | Fan |
| Operative time | IMN | ORPO | Fan |
| Operative time | IMN | ORPO | Wali |
| Operative time | MIPO | IMN | Lian |
| Operative time | MIPO | ORPO | Hadhoud |
| Intraoperative blood loss | IMN | ORPO | Fan |
| Intraoperative blood loss | IMN | ORPO | Wali |
| Intraoperative blood loss | MIPO | IMN | Lian |
| Hospital stay | IMN | ORPO | Fan |
| Hospital stay | IMN | ORPO | Wali |
| Constant scores | MIPO | IMN | Li |
| Rodriguez-Merchan criteria | DCP | IMN | Singisetti |
| Shoulder ROM | MIPO | IMN | Li |
| Shoulder ROM | DCP | IMN | Chapman |
| Elbow ROM | IMN | DCP | Chapman |
- Citation: Morris SC, Gowd AK, Agarwalla A, Phipatanakul WP, Amin NH, Liu JN. Fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized clinical trials of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures: A systematic review. World J Orthop 2022; 13(9): 825-836
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i9/825.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i9.825
