Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. May 18, 2022; 13(5): 444-453
Published online May 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i5.444
Table 1 Intraclass correlation coefficients

Neck-filling ratio
Seating height
Lateral stem contact
Subsidence
Intra-observer
Observer 10.85 (95%CI: 0.72-0.93)0.99 (95%CI: 0.99-0.99)0.98 (95%CI: 0.97-0.99)0.99 (95%CI: 0.99-0.99)
Observer 20.83 (95%CI: 0.68-0.91)0.98 (95%CI: 0.98-0.99)0.97 (95%CI: 0.95-0.99)0.99 (95%CI: 0.99-1.0)
Inter-observer0.77 (95%CI: 0.71-0.81)0.99 (95%CI: 0.99-0.99)0.97 (95%CI: 0.96-0.98)0.99 (95%CI: 0.98-0.99)
Table 2 Demographic data
Parameters
Values
No. of hips274
Gender (male/female)186/88
mean age (yr) (range, SD)48.1 (18-73, 11.2)
mean BMI (range, SD) (kg/m2)23.8 (14.7-40.9, 4.3)
Dorr’s classification, n (%)
Dorr’s type A223 (81.4)
Dorr’s type B51 (18.6)
Diagnosis, n (%)
ONFH213 (77.7)
DDH33 (12.1)
Primary osteoarthritis of the hip19 (6.9)
Femoral neck fracture9 (3.3)
Table 3 Results of subsidence of any radiographic parameters in the entire cohort
Parameters (n)
Value, mean (mm) (range, SD)
P value
Subsidence of the entire cohort (75/274)0.5 (0-12.7, 1.68)
Subsidence of any radiographic parameters
Neck-filling ratio < 0.8 (232) 0.51 (0-11.89, 1.44)0.99
Neck-filling ratio ≥ 0.8 (42)0.5 (0-12.7, 2.02)
Seating height < 5 mm (110) 0.51 (0-12.7, 0.16)0.99
Seating height ≥ 5 mm (164) 0.5 (0-11.89, 0.11)
Lateral stem contact < 1 mm (178) 0.39 (0-11.89, 1.26)0.09
Lateral stem contact ≥ 1 mm (96)0.71 (0-12.7, 1.94)
Table 4 Results of univariate regression analysis of 12 cases with significant subsidence
Variables
Univariate analysis
OR
95%CI
P value
Age (≥ 60 yr)0.960.2-4.60.96
DDH0.650.1-5.20.69
ONFH3.30.4-25.80.26
BMI (≥ 30 kg/m2)0.950.1-7.60.96
Dorr’s type B2.290.6-7.90.19
Seating height (< 5 mm)0.910.3-2.90.87
NFR (< 0.8)1.980.2-15.70.52
Insufficient lateral stem contact (≥ 1 mm)5.021.3-18.90.0171
Table 5 Summary of stem subsidence at two years follow-up for different types of short stems
Ref.
Femoral stem
Khanuja et al[18] classification
Follow-up (mo)
Subsidence(mm)
n
Christiansen et al[26]Primoris, Biomed, UK1240.3850
Schwarze et al[25]Metha, Aesculap, Germany2A240.8639
Jahnke et al[24]Metha, Aesculap, Germany2A241.28 ± 2.2471
This studyMetha, Aesculap, Germany2A240.5274
Budde et al[27]Nanos, Smith + nephew, Germany2A240.46 ± 0.3118
Ferguson et al[28]MiniHip, Corin, UK2A240.2620
Kutzner et al[23]Optimys, Mathys AG, Switzerland2B241.23 (contact); 2.07 (non-contact)191
Klein et al[31]CFP, Link, Germany2B240.3 (0.2-0.4)39
Mahmoud et al[29]Proxima, DePuy, UK3240.2228
Acklin et al[30]Fitmore, Zimmer, Switzerland4240.3924