Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2022; 13(3): 297-306
Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.297
Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.297
Table 1 The range value of variables analyzed for the study group
Age (yr) | Female | Men |
CLASS 1 (70-74) | 30 | 1 |
CLASS 2 (75-80) | 15 | 3 |
CLASS 3 (80-85) | 13 | 1 |
Total | 58 | 5 |
Table 2 Analysis of the fracture pattern
Total | Three-part fractures | Four-part fractures | |
Number | 63 | 41 | 22 |
Table 3 Analysis of distribution considering age class and fracture personality
Age class (yr) | |||
Neer classification | 70-75 | 75-80 | 80-90 |
Three-part fractures | 10 | 27 | 4 |
Four-part fractures | 5 | 7 | 10 |
Table 4 Postoperative clinical and psychological mean values at T0 follow-up
Group A | Group B | |
DASH | 50.8 | 54.6 |
CONSTANT | 36.1 | 32.0 |
GAD-7 | 5.4 | 6.4 |
CSS | 5.0 | 6.2 |
Table 5 Description of clinical and psychological scores at T1 follow-up
Group A | Group B | |
DASH | 42.1 | 39.1 |
CONSTANT | 47.3 | 43.2 |
GAD-7 | 4.3 | 5.7 |
CSS | 3.9 | 5.5 |
Table 6 Analysis of clinical and psychological scores at T2 follow-up
Group A | Group B | |
DASH | 32.8 | 33.6 |
CONSTANT | 60.0 | 52.9 |
GAD-7 | 3.2 | 4.3 |
CSS | 3.1 | 4.5 |
Table 7 Group C clinical and psychological mean values at three different follow-ups
DASH | CONSTANT | GAD-7 | CSS | |
T0 | 51.1 | 33.2 | 5.9 | 5.7 |
T1 | 38.8 | 46.9 | 4.9 | 4.5 |
T2 | 29.9 | 65.5 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
Table 8 Score distribution between treatment open reduction and internal fixation and PI
TO | T1 | T2 | |||||||
O.R.I.F. (n = 31) | RSA (n = 32) | P value | O.R.I.F. (n = 31) | RSA (n = 32) | P value | O.R.I.F. (n = 31) | RSA (n = 32) | P value | |
DASH | 50.0 (7.5) | 57.5 (7.0) | 0.002 | 45.0 (12.5) | 36.5 (12.3) | 0.256 | 30.0 (24.0) | 32.0 (5.5) | 0.587 |
CONSTANT | 38.0 (7.5) | 31.5 (6.0) | 0.008 | 48.0 (19.0) | 42.0 (7.3) | 0.110 | 60.0 (31.0) | 51.0 (5.8) | 0.049 |
GAD-7 | 5.0 (2.5) | 6.0 (2.3) | 0.015 | 4.0 (2.5) | 6.0 (2.0) | 0.002 | 3.0 (3.0) | 4.0 (1.3) | 0.012 |
CSS | 5.0 (2.0) | 6.5 (2.3) | 0.008 | 4.0 (2.5) | 6.0 (1.3) | 0.001 | 3.0 (2.5) | 4.0 (2.3) | 0.005 |
Table 9 Comparison between surgical and conservative treatment
n = 32 | T0 | P value | T1 | P value | T2 | P value |
DASH | 53 (44.5) | 0.344 | 39 (35) | 0.421 | 30 (26) | 0.014 |
CONSTANT | 32 (30) | 0.223 | 48.5 (42) | 0.063 | 65.5 (60) | < 0.001 |
GAD-7 | 6 (5) | 0.827 | 5 (3.3) | 0.548 | 3 (2) | 0.002 |
CSS | 6 (5) | 0.481 | 5 (3) | 0.090 | 3 (2) | 0.001 |
- Citation: Maccagnano G, Solarino G, Pesce V, Vicenti G, Coviello M, Nappi VS, Giannico OV, Notarnicola A, Moretti B. Plate vs reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: The psychological health influence the choice of device? . World J Orthop 2022; 13(3): 297-306
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i3/297.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.297