Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2022; 13(3): 267-277
Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.267
Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.267
Table 1 Distribution of participants according to groups, gender and fracture pattern according Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification
Group-1 (with distal locking) | Group-2 (without distal locking) | |
Male | 24 | 29 |
Female | 46 | 41 |
Total patients | 70 | 70 |
31-A1 | 32 | 28 |
31-A2 | 38 | 42 |
Table 2 Comparison of operative time and IITV radiation time amongst both groups
Group-1 | Group-2 | P value | |
Average operative time | 42 min | 28 min | < 0.001 |
Average IITV radiation time | 59 s | 45 s | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Incidence of proximal lock related complications
Group-1 (n = 70) | Group-2 (n = 70) | |||
31A1 (n = 32) | 31A2 (n = 38) | 31A1 (n = 28) | 31A1 (n = 42) | |
Proximal screw backout | 01 | 08 | 00 | 04 |
Proximal screw breakage | 00 | 01 | 00 | 00 |
Proximal screw cut out | 00 | 02 | 00 | 00 |
Z effect | 00 | 03 | 00 | 00 |
- Citation: Lil NA, Makwana VR, Patel TD, Patel AR. Comparative study of intertrochanteric fracture fixation using proximal femoral nail with and without distal interlocking screws. World J Orthop 2022; 13(3): 267-277
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i3/267.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.267