Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Dec 18, 2021; 12(12): 1036-1044
Published online Dec 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i12.1036
Table 1 Characteristics of included studies
No
Ref.
Joint arthrodesed
Number of joints
Follow up (mo)
Outcome
1Segal et al[5], 20201st MTP joint3036Mean postop AOFAS score: 80.5
2Patel et al[6], 20191st MTP joint5412Mean MOXFQ improved from 46.4 to 18.4
3Singhal et al[7], 20181st MTP joint2128Mean MOXFQ improved from 49.7 to 17.9
4Drampalos et al[8], 20171st MTP joint1215Mean AOFAS score improved from 29.4 to 73.3
5Drampalos et al[9], 20161st MTP joint2319Mean AOFAS score improved from 29 to 75.4
6Shymon et al[10], 2016Talonavicular1212VAS pain level decreased from 7.3 to 2.1
7Parker et al[11], 2014Tibio talar joint10 cadavericHigher forces within the arthrodesis (3.95 kg vs 2.35 kg) in IOFIX
8Burchard et al[12], 20181st MTP joint9 syntheticLower load to failure and less stiffness in IOFIX
9Roth et al[13], 20141st MTP joint7 cadavericLesser cycles to failure in IOFIX