Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2021; 12(10): 791-801
Published online Oct 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.791
Published online Oct 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.791
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
Clinical studies related to changes in the hindfoot following TKA | Less than 10 patients |
Published in a peer review journal | Case reports |
Written in English | Cadaveric studies |
Full text version available | Animal studies |
Review articles | |
In vivo studies |
Table 2 Study characteristics and patient demographics
Ref. | LOE | Patients, n (%) | Knees, n (%) | Age (yr) | Sex (M/F) | Follow-up (mo) | MCMS |
Chandler and Moskal[6], 2004 | 2 | 86 | 86 | N/R | N/R | 3 | 48 |
Cho et al[7], 2017 | 2 | 117 | 195 | 69.1 | 8/187 | 24 | 66 |
Hara et al[8], 2015 | 3 | 100 | 100 | 74.3 | 14/86 | 0.75 | 48 |
Jeong et al[9], 2018 | 2 | 331 | 375 | 68.3 | 23/308 | 6 | 60 |
Kim et al[10], 2018 | 3 | 55 | 65 | 69.3 | N/R | 31.3 | 71 |
Levinger et al[11], 2012 | 2 | 19 | 26 | 67.5 | 13/6 | 12 | 46 |
Mansur et al[12], 2019 | 2 | 72 | 72 | N/R | 23/49 | 3 | 44 |
Mullaji and Shetty[13], 2011 | 2 | 125 | 165 | 66.1 | 24/101 | 12 | 51 |
Okamoto et al[14], 2017 | 3 | 75 | 80 | 72.5 | 8/67 | 24 | 48 |
Palanisami et al[15], 2020 | 3 | 91 | 121 | 63.4 | 29/62 | 12 | 58 |
Takenaka et al[16], 2016 | 3 | 71 | 73 | 74.7 | 17/56 | 12 | 48 |
Table 3 Summary of outcomes
Radiographic Assessment | AOFAS | ||||||||
Ref. | Patients, n (%) | Knees, n (%) | Knee deformity | Hindfoot | Ankle | Lower limb alignment | Pre-op | Post-op | Postoperative outcomes |
Chandler and Moskal[6], 2004 | 86 | 86 | Both valgus and varus | TCA: Pre-op = 0.4°; Post-op = -0.1° | FTA: Pre-op = 3.6°; Post-op = 6.6° | Both valgus and varus hindfoot alignment improved post TKA | |||
Valgus hindfoot alignment remained in valgus alignment post TKA | |||||||||
Varus hindfoot alignment remained in varus alignment post TKA | |||||||||
Cho et al[7], 2017 | 117 | 195 | Varus only | TCA: Pre-op = 5.2° valgus; Post-op = 2.1° valgus | Mechanical alignment angle: Pre-op = 10.8° varus; Post-op = 1.8° varus | Valgus hindfoot alignment improved post TKA | |||
Severe varus knee deformities had best improvement in hindfoot alignment post TKA | |||||||||
Hara et al[8], 2015 | 100 | 100 | Varus only | VVA: Pre-op = 78.8°; Post-op = 76.7° | FTA: Pre-op = 186.7°; Post-op = 174.4° | Varus hindfoot alignment with varus knee deformity remained in varus alignment post TKA | |||
Valgus hindfoot alignment with varus knee deformity improved post TKA | |||||||||
Jeong et al[9], 2018 | 331 | 375 | Varus only | HA: Pre-op = 13.5°; Post-op = 5.8°. HR: Pre-op = 0.2°; Post-op = 0.3°. HD: Pre-op = 11.0°; Post-op = 5.2° | TT: Pre-op = 0.4°; Post-op = 0.1°. GD: Pre-op = 6.5°; Post-op = 0.2°. TAS: Pre-op = 92.0°; Post-op = 92.0°. TLS: Pre-op = 81.8°; Post-op = 81.3° | Mechanical axis: Pre-op = 11.1° varus; Post-op = 0.3° varus | Valgus hindfoot alignment improved post TKA | ||
Subtalar joint became more varus post TKA | |||||||||
Kim et al[10], 2018 | 55 | 65 | Varus only | HAVA: Pre-op = 6.1°; Post-op = 5.7° | TT: Pre-op = 1.9°; Post-op = 1.7°. TAS: Pre-op = 85.9°; Post-op = 84.9°. MCS: Pre-op = 2.4 mm; Post-op = 2.6 mm. MTTJS: Pre-op = 2.8°; Post-op = 2.3°. FTGA: Pre-op = 85.6°; Post-op = 86.5° | Mechanical axis deviation angle: Pre-op = 10.0°; Post-op = 1.9° | 95.2 | 91.5 | Valgus hindfoot alignment slightly improved post TKA |
Newly developed ankle pain post TKA was associated with larger degrees of residual varus knee deformity | |||||||||
Levinger et al[11], 2012 | 19 | 26 | Varus only | FPI: Pre-op = 2.9°; Post-op = 2.7° | FTA: Pre-op = -1.2°; Post-op = 4.9° | Increased range of motion of the rearfoot in the frontal plane post TKA | |||
No change in static foot pressure post TKA | |||||||||
Mansur et al[12], 2019 | 72 | 72 | Both varus and valgus | Intersection of the load axis of the leg and the calcaneus axis: Pre-op = -3.8°; Post-op = -4.4° | FTA: Pre-op = ? | 74.3 | 89.4 | Varus hindfoot alignment with varus knee deformity remained in varus alignment post TKA | |
Varus hindfoot alignment with valgus knee deformity, valgus hindfoot alignment with valgus knee deformity and valgus hindfoot alignment with varus knee deformity all improved post TKA | |||||||||
Mullaji and Shetty[13], 2011 | 125 | 165 | Both varus and valgus | TCA: Pre-op = 188°; Post-op = 185.5° | CMAD: Pre-op = 34.3 mm; Post-op = 0.0 mm. GMAD: Pre-op = 31.0 mm; Post-op = -6.0 mm | Valgus hindfoot alignment with varus knee deformity improved post TKA | |||
87% of patients had persistent valgus hindfoot alignment post TKA | |||||||||
Okamoto et al[14], 2017 | 75 | 80 | Varus only | Calcaneal pitch: Pre-op = 14.9°. Naviculocuboid overlap: Pre-op = 84.7°; Post-op = 65.7° | TT: Pre-op = 13.1°; Post-op = 4.4°. TI: Pre-op = 9.9°; Post-op = 0.8° | Mechanical axis: Pre-op = 5.0°; Post-op = 0.7° | 46.6 | 60.2 | Valgus hindfoot alignment with severe varus knee deformity did not improve post TKA |
Valgus hindfoot alignment with moderate varus knee deformity improved post TKA | |||||||||
Palanisami et al[15], 2020 | 91 | 121 | Varus only | TH: Pre-op = 9.9°; Post-op = 4.7°. VVI: Pre-op = -0.29; Post-op = -0.04 | FTMA: Pre-op = 162.0°; Post-op = 178.8° | 59.2 | 88.7 | Valgus hindfoot alignment with varus knee deformity improved post TKA | |
TKA restores foot loading pattern medially | |||||||||
Takenaka et al[16], 2016 | 71 | 73 | Varus only | VVA: Preop = 78.2; Post-op = 76.0 | FTA: Pre-op = 184.8; Post-op = 173.9 | Valgus hindfoot alignment with varus knee deformity improved post TKA | |||
Varus hindfoot alignment with varus knee deformity did not improve post TKA |
Table 4 Hindfoot radiographic parameters
Hindfoot radiographic parameters | Studies, n (%) |
TCA | 3 (27.3) |
VVA | 2 (18.2) |
HAVA | 1 (9.1) |
Intersection of the load axis of the leg and the calcaneus axis | 1 (9.1) |
TH | 1 (9.1) |
Calcaneal pitch | 1 (9.1) |
Naviculocuboid overlap | 1 (9.1) |
FPI | 1 (9.1) |
HA | 1 (9.1) |
HR | 1 (9.1) |
HD | 1 (9.1) |
- Citation: Butler JJ, Mercer NP, Hurley ET, Azam MT, Kennedy JG. Alignment of the hindfoot following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. World J Orthop 2021; 12(10): 791-801
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v12/i10/791.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.791