Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2021; 12(10): 732-742
Published online Oct 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.732
Table 1 Indications and relative contraindications summary
Indications
Relative contraindication
High-demand patientsLow-demand patients
End-stage bi- or tricompartmental knee OASevere coronal malalignment (> 15°)
Coronal malalignment < 15°Inflammatory arthritis
ACL integrity:ACL mucoid degeneration/absence
Clinical assessment (Lachman, anterior drawer test, pivot shift test) Relevant preoperative reduction of ROM (> 10°)
Intraoperative assessment
Minimal ROM reduction (< 5/10°)
Table 2 Second-generation bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty clinical results
Ref.
Follow up in mo
BCR model (n)
Pre-op ROM flex, mean
Post-op ROM flex, mean
Pre-op KSS, mean
Post-op KSS, mean
FJS
WOMAC
Alnachoukati et al[23]12Vanguard XP (146)116°121°4896
Biazzo et al[49]33.82Vanguard XP (24)8.68 (BCR) vs 12.81 (CR)
Baumann et al[20]18Vanguard XP (34)53.4 ± 26.4
Hennessy et al[45]12.7Vanguard XP (29)58.1 ± 11.886.6 ± 16.7
Kono et al[35]7.7Journey II XR128.7 ± 6.1
Kalaai et al[33]3.6Vanguard XP (61)36.2 ± 8.122 ± 10.158.4 ± 33.7
Peng et al[38]12.7Vanguard XP (29)58.1 ± 11.887.9 ± 16.7
Pelt et al[25]36Vanguard XP (141)121123
Tsai et al[32]12.9Vanguard XP (30)58.586.6
Table 3 Second-generation bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty complications
Ref.
Year
BCR model (n)
Complication
Follow-up time in mo, mean
Alnachoukati et al[23] 2018Vanguard XP (146)9 intraoperative tibial island fracture; 1 cyclops lesion; 1 aseptic loosening of tibial component12
Biazzo et al[49]2020Vanguard XP (24)2 Aseptic loosening; 1 periprosthetic infection; 1 intraoperative tibial island fracture33.82
Kalaai et al[33]2019Vanguard XP (61)1 valgus thrust3.6
Klaassen et al[51]2017Vanguard XP (3)2 cyclops lesion (3 knees)
Pelt et al[25]2019Vanguard XP (141)2 Intraoperative tibial island fracture; 11 arthrofibrosis; 1 hematoma; 1 chronic pain36