Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2020; 11(1): 36-46
Published online Jan 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.36
Published online Jan 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.36
Table 1 Modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for periprosthetic joint infection definition[3]
| Two or more positive periprosthetic cultures with phenotypically identical organisms, or |
| A sinus tract communicating with the joint, or |
| Having at least three of the following minor criteria: |
| Elevated serum C-reactive protein > 10 mg/L AND erythrocyte sedimentation rate > 30 mm/h; |
| Elevated synovial fluid white blood cell count 3.000 cells/μL OR ++ result on leukocyte esterase test strip; |
| Elevated synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%) > 80%; |
| Positive histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue; |
| A single positive culture. |
Table 2 European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria for periprosthetic joint infection definition. One or more criteria fulfilled means positive periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis[4]
| Sinus tract OR purulence around the prosthesis; |
| Acute inflammation on histopathology of periprosthetic tissue; |
| Elevated synovial fluid white blood cell count of more than 2.000 cells/μL OR elevated synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%) > 70%; |
| Microbial growth in synovial fluid OR > 2 tissue samples (for highly virulent microorganisms already one positive sample confirms infection) OR sonication fluid (≥ 50 CFU/mL). |
Table 3 New 2018 International Consensus Meeting scoring criteria for periprosthetic joint infectiondefinition[5]: Major criteria (at least one of the following)
| Two positive cultures of the same organism | Infected |
| Sinus tract with evidence of communication to the joint or visualization of the prosthesis |
Table 4 New 2018 International Consensus Meeting scoring criteria for periprosthetic joint infection definition[5]: Preoperative diagnosis
| Preoperative score: Minor criteria | Score | Decision |
| Serum: Elevated CRP or D-Dimer | 2 | ≥ 6: Infected |
| Serum: Elevated ESR | 1 | |
| Synovial: Elevated synovial WBC count or LE | 3 | 2-5: Possibly infected1 |
| Synovial: Positive alpha-defensin | 3 | |
| Synovial: Elevated synovial PMN (%) | 2 | 0-1: Not infected |
| Synovial: Elevated synovial CRP | 1 |
Table 5 New 2018 International Consensus Meeting scoring criteria for periprosthetic joint infection definition[5]: Intraoperatieve diagnosis
| Inconclusive preoperative score1or dry tap | Score | Decision |
| Preoperative score | - | ≥ 6: Infected; 4-5: Inconclusive; 0-3: Not infected |
| Positive histology | 3 | |
| Positive purulence | 3 | |
| Single positive culture | 2 |
Table 6 Demographics of the described cohort and the group of excluded patients (no alpha-defensin lateral flow test performed)
| Cohort | Excluded | |
| Total (n) | 52 | 31 |
| Age [mean (SD), yr] | 72 (9.2) | 67.5 (9.5) |
| Gender (n) | ||
| Male | 24 | 12 |
| Female | 28 | 19 |
| Operated side (n) | ||
| Right | 28 | 12 |
| Left | 24 | 19 |
| Prosthesis (n) | ||
| Total hip arthroplasty | 46 | 26 |
| Hemi-arthroplasty | 6 | 5 |
| Articulation (n) | ||
| MoP | 31 | 18 |
| CoP | 8 | 4 |
| CoC | 4 | 3 |
| MoM | 3 | 1 |
| HA | 6 | 5 |
| Time to aspiration [Median (range), mo] | 35 (3-266) | 32.4 (3-191) |
Table 7 Characteristics of all patients with positive alpha-defensin lateral flow test and/or positive or inconclusive criteria
| Case | Criteria | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | PJI? | |||||||
| Art | Sinus tract | Visible purulence | CRP (mg/ L) | ESR (mm/h) | WBC count (cells/μL) | PMN% | Culture synovial fluid (nr of cultures) | Culture tissue (nr of cultures) | AD | MSIS (+/-; criteria) | EBJIS (+/-; criteria) | 2018 ICM (+/-/i; criteria) | Revision surgery | 1- or 2-stage | ||||
| 1 | CoC | - | - | 6.5 | 21.0 | 19100 | 91 | neg (1) | neg (6) | + | - | E,F | + | E,F | + | E,F,I | Yes | 2-stage |
| 2 | MoP | Yes | - | 9.0 | 23.0 | - | - | pos (2) | pos (8/9) | + | + | A,G,H | + | A,G,H | + | A,G,H,I | Yes | 2-stage |
| 3 | MoP | - | - | 8.5 | 29.0 | 3000 | 4 | neg (2) | - | - | - | + | E | - | No | - | ||
| 4 | MoP | - | - | 9.8 | 16.0 | 6200 | 77 | neg (2) | pos (5/8) | + | + | E,H | + | E,F,H | + | E,H,I | Yes | 2-stage |
| 5 | CoC | - | - | 6.9 | 10.0 | 2300 | - | neg (1) | - | - | - | + | E | - | No | - | ||
| 6 | MoP | - | - | 12.0 | 26.0 | 10 | - | neg (2) | pos (1/2) | - | - | C,H | - | i | C,H | Yes | 1-stage | |
| 7 | MoP | - | - | - | - | 9350 | - | neg (1) | - | - | - | E | + | E | - | E | No | - |
| 8 | HA | - | - | - | - | - | - | neg (1) | pos (1/6) | + | - | H | - | i | H,I | Yes | 1-stage | |
| 9 | MoP | - | - | 144.0 | 64.0 | 37300 | 92 | pos (1/2) | pos (2/6) | + | + | C,D,E,F,G,H | + | E,F,G,H | + | C,D,E,F,H,I | Yes | DAIR |
| 10 | MoP | - | - | 61.0 | 72.0 | 7900 | 95 | pos (1/1) | pos (9/9) | + | + | C,D,E,F,G,H | + | E,F,G,H | + | C,D,E,F,H,I | Yes | 2-stage |
| 11 | MoP | - | - | 71.0 | 55.0 | 35300 | 97 | pos (2/2) | pos (7/7) | + | + | C,D,E,F,G,H | + | E,F,G,H | + | C,D,E,F,H,I | Yes | 2-stage |
| 12 | HA | - | - | 9.6 | - | 4900 | 81 | - | - | + | - | E,F | + | E,F | + | E,F,I | No | - |
| 13 | MoM | - | Yes | 195.0 | - | 264000 | 96 | neg (2) | - | + | + | B,C,E,F | + | B,E,F | + | B,C,E,F,I | No | - |
| 14 | MoP | - | - | 15.0 | 13.0 | 8000 | - | neg (1) | neg (6) | + | - | C,E | + | E | + | C,E,I | Yes | 2-stage |
| 15 | HA | - | - | 1.0 | 9.0 | 4000 | 15 | neg (2) | - | - | - | E | + | E | - | E | No | - |
| 16 | MoM | - | - | 5.7 | 8.0 | 5170 | 52 | neg (3) | - | + | - | E | + | E | + | E,I | No | - |
Table 8 All cases of positive cultures in the described cohort
| Case | Culture after aspiration (positive cultures/nr of total cultures) | Culture after revision (positive cultures/nr of total cultures) |
| 2 | Propionibacterium acnes (2/2) | Cutibacterium acnes (8/9) |
| Staphylococcus aureus (1/2) | ||
| 4 | Negative (2/2) | Staphylococcus capitis (5/8) |
| Staphyloccus hominis (1/8) | ||
| Staphylococcus epidermidis (1/8) | ||
| Propionibacterium acnes (1/8) | ||
| 7 | Negative (2/2) | Propionibacterium acnes (1/2) |
| 8 | Negative (1/1) | Staphylococcus capitis (1/6) |
| 9 | Staphylococcus aureus (1/2) | Staphylococcus aureus (2/6) |
| 10 | Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1/1) | Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9/9) |
| Staphylococcus epidermidis (1/9) | ||
| 13 | Staphylococcus lugdunensis (2/2) | Staphylococcus lugdunensis (7/7) |
- Citation: Kuiper JW, Pander P, Vos SJ. Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients. World J Orthop 2020; 11(1): 36-46
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i1/36.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.36
