Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2019; 10(7): 268-277
Published online Jul 18, 2019. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i7.268
Published online Jul 18, 2019. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i7.268
Table 1 Criteria and points allocation used in calculating the ASEPSIS score
ASEPSIS Score calculation | |
Points | Criterion |
Additional treatment | |
10 | Antibiotics |
5 | Drainage of pus under local anaesthetic |
10 | Debridement of wound under general anaesthetic |
0-5 | Serous discharge |
0-5 | Erythema |
0-10 | Purulent exudate |
0-10 | Separation of deep tissues |
10 | Isolation of bacteria |
5 | Stay in hospital over 14 d |
Breakdown of ASEPSIS score | |
0-10 | No infection, normal healing |
11-20 | Disturbance of healing |
21-30 | Minor infection |
31-40 | Moderate infection |
> 40 | Severe infection |
Table 2 Patient demographics between the two groups
Trial group | P value | |||
Controls (n = 69) | Cases (n = 81) | |||
Age | mean (SD) | 67.85 (9.85) | 68.65 | 0.44 |
(10.90) | ||||
Diagnosis | OA | 68 | 77 | 0.33 |
SUFE | 0 | 2 | ||
AVN | 1 | 0 | ||
Hip dysplasia | 0 | 1 | ||
Perthes | 0 | 1 | ||
Gender | Male | 24 | 25 | 0.73 |
Female | 45 | 56 | ||
BMI | mean (SD) | 28.70 (5.13) | 29.14 (4.97) | 0.54 |
Smoker | Yes | 6 | 6 | 0.64 |
Never | 42 | 57 | ||
Ex-smoker | 13 | 12 | ||
Diabetic | Yes | 4 | 10 | 0.26 |
No | 57 | 64 | ||
ASA Grade | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0.68 |
2 | 47 | 52 | ||
3 | 13 | 20 |
Table 3 Comparison of operative data between the two groups
Trial group | P value | |||
Controls (n = 69) | Cases (n = 81) | |||
Site | Hip | 42 | 54 | 0.5 |
Knee | 27 | 27 | ||
Surgeon | Consultant | 25 | 29 | 0.63 |
Registrar | 38 | 41 | ||
Fellow | 6 | 11 | ||
Anaesthetic | General | 45 | 50 | 0.56 |
Regional | 17 | 26 | ||
Both | 3 | 2 | ||
Local anaesthetic | Yes | 67 | 77 | 0.38 |
No | 1 | 4 | ||
Length of operation | mean (SD) | 88.44 (23.84) | 91.24 (26.5) | 0.67 |
mean (SD) | 3.75 (0.87) | 3.53 (0.81) | 0.12 | |
Number of sutures used | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0.26 |
3 | 23 | 29 | ||
4 | 30 | 30 | ||
5 | 6 | 8 | ||
> 5 | 1 | 0 | ||
Prosthesis hip | Synergy – R3 | 37 | 48 | 0.30 |
Trifit – Trinity | 3 | 3 | ||
Exeter | 0 | 3 | ||
Knee | Triathalon | 21 | 23 | 0.70 |
Saiph knee | 5 | 3 | ||
Wound closure (min) | mean (SD) | 14.64 (5.51) | 13.89 (5.13) | 0.47 |
VAS score (mean, SD) | Day 1 | 6.47 (2.62) | 6.20 (2.35) | 0.34 |
Day 3 | 4.75 (2.33) | 4.18 (2.33) | 0.15 | |
Day 5 | 4.67 (1.75) | 2.92 (2.87) | 0.18 | |
Length of stay (d) | mean (SD) | 6.13 (4.23) | 6.23 (4.11) | 0.95 |
Table 4 Outcomes at follow-up
Trial group | P value | |||
Controls (n = 69) | Cases (n = 81) | |||
ASEPSIS scores | ||||
0-10 | 65 | 75 | 0.75 | |
> 10 | 4 | 6 | ||
mean (SD range) | 1.41 | 2.54 | 0.036 | |
(0.38-2.43) | (1.41-3.68) | |||
Follow-up outcomes (2-wk) | ||||
Site of follow-up | Hospital | 35 | 37 | 0.21 |
Community | 27 | 28 | ||
Inpatient | 2 | 10 | ||
Did not attend | 5 | 6 | ||
Wound complications | Yes | 1 | 6 | 0.22 |
No | 63 | 69 | ||
Superficial SSI | 1 | 2 | ||
Erythema | 0 | 3 | ||
Serous discharge | 0 | 1 | ||
Follow-up outcomes (6-wk) | ||||
Attended hospital | Yes | 61 | 65 | 0.189 |
No | 8 | 16 | ||
Wound complications | Yes | 1 | 8 | 0.03 |
No | 60 | 57 | ||
Superficial SSI | 1 | 3 | ||
Wound dehiscence | 0 | 1 | ||
Irritation from suture | 0 | 2 | ||
Serous discharge | 0 | 1 | ||
Deep SSI | 0 | 1 | ||
Systemic complications | Nausea and vomiting | 0 | 2 | 0.12 |
Dizziness | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
Bleeding(not from wound) | 1 | 2 | 0.26 | |
Stiffness | 4 | 5 | 0.30 | |
Neurovascular injury | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
DVT | 1 | 0 | 0.18 | |
PE | 0 | 1 | 0.19 | |
Chest infection | 1 | 2 | 0.26 | |
MI | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
CVA | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
Fracture | 0 | 2 | 0.12 | |
Dislocation | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
Loosening | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
Mortality | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
Missing data | 8 | 16 |
- Citation: Sukeik M, George D, Gabr A, Kallala R, Wilson P, Haddad FS. Randomised controlled trial of triclosan coated vs uncoated sutures in primary hip and knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2019; 10(7): 268-277
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v10/i7/268.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i7.268