Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2019; 10(7): 268-277
Published online Jul 18, 2019. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i7.268
Published online Jul 18, 2019. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i7.268
Table 1 Criteria and points allocation used in calculating the ASEPSIS score
| ASEPSIS Score calculation | |
| Points | Criterion |
| Additional treatment | |
| 10 | Antibiotics |
| 5 | Drainage of pus under local anaesthetic |
| 10 | Debridement of wound under general anaesthetic |
| 0-5 | Serous discharge |
| 0-5 | Erythema |
| 0-10 | Purulent exudate |
| 0-10 | Separation of deep tissues |
| 10 | Isolation of bacteria |
| 5 | Stay in hospital over 14 d |
| Breakdown of ASEPSIS score | |
| 0-10 | No infection, normal healing |
| 11-20 | Disturbance of healing |
| 21-30 | Minor infection |
| 31-40 | Moderate infection |
| > 40 | Severe infection |
Table 2 Patient demographics between the two groups
| Trial group | P value | |||
| Controls (n = 69) | Cases (n = 81) | |||
| Age | mean (SD) | 67.85 (9.85) | 68.65 | 0.44 |
| (10.90) | ||||
| Diagnosis | OA | 68 | 77 | 0.33 |
| SUFE | 0 | 2 | ||
| AVN | 1 | 0 | ||
| Hip dysplasia | 0 | 1 | ||
| Perthes | 0 | 1 | ||
| Gender | Male | 24 | 25 | 0.73 |
| Female | 45 | 56 | ||
| BMI | mean (SD) | 28.70 (5.13) | 29.14 (4.97) | 0.54 |
| Smoker | Yes | 6 | 6 | 0.64 |
| Never | 42 | 57 | ||
| Ex-smoker | 13 | 12 | ||
| Diabetic | Yes | 4 | 10 | 0.26 |
| No | 57 | 64 | ||
| ASA Grade | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0.68 |
| 2 | 47 | 52 | ||
| 3 | 13 | 20 | ||
Table 3 Comparison of operative data between the two groups
| Trial group | P value | |||
| Controls (n = 69) | Cases (n = 81) | |||
| Site | Hip | 42 | 54 | 0.5 |
| Knee | 27 | 27 | ||
| Surgeon | Consultant | 25 | 29 | 0.63 |
| Registrar | 38 | 41 | ||
| Fellow | 6 | 11 | ||
| Anaesthetic | General | 45 | 50 | 0.56 |
| Regional | 17 | 26 | ||
| Both | 3 | 2 | ||
| Local anaesthetic | Yes | 67 | 77 | 0.38 |
| No | 1 | 4 | ||
| Length of operation | mean (SD) | 88.44 (23.84) | 91.24 (26.5) | 0.67 |
| mean (SD) | 3.75 (0.87) | 3.53 (0.81) | 0.12 | |
| Number of sutures used | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0.26 |
| 3 | 23 | 29 | ||
| 4 | 30 | 30 | ||
| 5 | 6 | 8 | ||
| > 5 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Prosthesis hip | Synergy – R3 | 37 | 48 | 0.30 |
| Trifit – Trinity | 3 | 3 | ||
| Exeter | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knee | Triathalon | 21 | 23 | 0.70 |
| Saiph knee | 5 | 3 | ||
| Wound closure (min) | mean (SD) | 14.64 (5.51) | 13.89 (5.13) | 0.47 |
| VAS score (mean, SD) | Day 1 | 6.47 (2.62) | 6.20 (2.35) | 0.34 |
| Day 3 | 4.75 (2.33) | 4.18 (2.33) | 0.15 | |
| Day 5 | 4.67 (1.75) | 2.92 (2.87) | 0.18 | |
| Length of stay (d) | mean (SD) | 6.13 (4.23) | 6.23 (4.11) | 0.95 |
Table 4 Outcomes at follow-up
| Trial group | P value | |||
| Controls (n = 69) | Cases (n = 81) | |||
| ASEPSIS scores | ||||
| 0-10 | 65 | 75 | 0.75 | |
| > 10 | 4 | 6 | ||
| mean (SD range) | 1.41 | 2.54 | 0.036 | |
| (0.38-2.43) | (1.41-3.68) | |||
| Follow-up outcomes (2-wk) | ||||
| Site of follow-up | Hospital | 35 | 37 | 0.21 |
| Community | 27 | 28 | ||
| Inpatient | 2 | 10 | ||
| Did not attend | 5 | 6 | ||
| Wound complications | Yes | 1 | 6 | 0.22 |
| No | 63 | 69 | ||
| Superficial SSI | 1 | 2 | ||
| Erythema | 0 | 3 | ||
| Serous discharge | 0 | 1 | ||
| Follow-up outcomes (6-wk) | ||||
| Attended hospital | Yes | 61 | 65 | 0.189 |
| No | 8 | 16 | ||
| Wound complications | Yes | 1 | 8 | 0.03 |
| No | 60 | 57 | ||
| Superficial SSI | 1 | 3 | ||
| Wound dehiscence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Irritation from suture | 0 | 2 | ||
| Serous discharge | 0 | 1 | ||
| Deep SSI | 0 | 1 | ||
| Systemic complications | Nausea and vomiting | 0 | 2 | 0.12 |
| Dizziness | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
| Bleeding(not from wound) | 1 | 2 | 0.26 | |
| Stiffness | 4 | 5 | 0.30 | |
| Neurovascular injury | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
| DVT | 1 | 0 | 0.18 | |
| PE | 0 | 1 | 0.19 | |
| Chest infection | 1 | 2 | 0.26 | |
| MI | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
| CVA | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
| Fracture | 0 | 2 | 0.12 | |
| Dislocation | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
| Loosening | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
| Mortality | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | |
| Missing data | 8 | 16 | ||
- Citation: Sukeik M, George D, Gabr A, Kallala R, Wilson P, Haddad FS. Randomised controlled trial of triclosan coated vs uncoated sutures in primary hip and knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2019; 10(7): 268-277
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v10/i7/268.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i7.268
