Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2017; 9(7): 609-619
Published online Jul 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i7.609
Published online Jul 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i7.609
Table 1 Study design and participant characteristics
Ref. | Study design/country/year | No. of participants | Mean age | % male | Participant inclusion criteria and procedural details |
Benit et al[26] | Randomized trial; Belgium; 1994-1995 | 50 | 57.7 | 100% | Participants had transradial coronary angioplasty with 6-Fr catheters and Palmaz-Schatz stent |
Campeau et al[27] | Cohort study; Canada; Unclear | 100 | 58 (median) | 90% | Participants had transradial coronary angiogram with 5-Fr, 6-Fr and 7-Fr sheath |
Chatelain et al[28] | Cohort study; Switzerland; 1995-1997 | 159 | 60 | 82% | Participants had transradial diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures with 4-Fr, 5-Fr or 6-Fr introducer sheath and guide catheters with RadiStop radial compression system |
De Belder et al[29] | Cohort study; United Kingdom; Unclear | 75 | Unclear | 69% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and intervention and severe peripheral vascular disease with 5-Fr or 6-Fr sheath and 6-Fr guide catheter |
Kiemeneij et al[30] | Cohort study; The Netherlands; 1992-1993 | 100 | 62 | 77% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography with 6-Fr introducer and 6-Fr-guide catheters |
Lotan et al[31] | Cohort study; Israel; 1994 | 100 | 61 | 79% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 6-Fr introducer and 6-Fr guide catheters |
Prull et al[32] | Cohort study; Germany; Unclear | 93 | 62.5 | 80.6% | Participants had transradial diagnostic cardiac catheterization with 5-Fr or 6-Fr sheath or transradial coronary intervention with 7-Fr sheath |
Sciahbasi et al[33] | Prospective cohort study; Italy; Unclear | 99 | 65 | 72% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 6-Fr introducer sheath |
Tharmaratnam et al[35] | Retrospective case control study; United Kingdom; 2005-2006 | 1283 | 65.5 | 79% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty |
Valgimigli et al[39] | Prospective cohort study; The Netherlands, Italy; 2014 | 942 | 70 | 73% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty |
Van Leeuwen et al[24] | Prospective cohort study; The Netherlands; 2015 | 286 | 64 | 72% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 6-Fr introducer sheath |
Wu et al[37] | Cohort study; United States; 1996-1998 | 40 | 65 | 88% | Participants underwent 6-Fr and 8-Fr transradial procedure |
Zankl et al[34] | Prospective cohort study; Germany; 2010 | 488 | Unclear | Unclear | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 5- and 6-Fr introducer, 4-, 5- and 6-Fr catheters |
Table 2 Results of studies
Ref. | Measure of hand function and vascular complications | Follow up post procedure | Results |
Benit et al[26] | Local complications assessed in clinic by history and EMG | 1 mo | Nerve damage documented by EMG: 0/50 Local pain: 0/50 |
Campeau et al[27] | Patients were re-examined or questioned over telephone about local complications | 1 to 3 mo | No nerve injury: 0/100 |
Chatelain et al[28] | Physicians assessed for any clinical events | Assessment prior to discharge | Paraesthesia of right thumb during exercise: 1/159 |
De Belder et al[29] | Clinical evaluation | 4-6 wk | Haematoma and paraethesia post procedure: 1/75 Hand sensation and function at 4-6 wk: 0/75 |
Kiemeneij et al[30] | Examination and ultrasound study performed if radial artery pulsations or flow were absent | 1 to 3 mo | Functional disability of the hand: 0/100 |
Lotan et al[31] | Assessment methods unclear | 1 mo follow up | Small hematoma in wrist: 3/100 Small pseudoaneurysm: 2/100 Numbness of the thumb and index finger: 1/100 No flow on Doppler: 2/100 |
Prull et al[32] | Clinical evaluation with ultrasound | Post-procedure assessment | Vascular complication: 9/93 Motor skills, coordination or force reduction of hand after procedure: 0/93 No pseudoaneurysm: 0/93 |
Sciahbasi et al[33] | Radial artery occlusion by ultrasound test. Handgrip strength by Jamar Plus dynamometer. Thumb and forefinger pinch test by Jamar Plus electronic pinch gauge | Day of procedure and at least 30 d follow up | Radial artery occlusion: 9/99 Hand grip strength change at follow up: 0/99 Thumb and forefinger pinch test change at follow up: 0/99 |
Tharmaratnam et al[35] | Questionnaire posted to address and clinical notes for significant clinical events | Unclear | Problem with radial access site: 166/1283 (12.9%) Pain at puncture site: 95/1283 (7.4%) Swelling: 46/1283 (3.6%) Bruising: 30/1283 (2.3%) Non-specific sensory abnormalities either pain or paraesthesia in hand: 22/1283 (1.71%) |
Valgimigli et al[39] | Radial artery occlusion by duplex echocardiographic examination. Hand grip strength test with dynanometer | Just after procedure, 1 d, 30 d and 1 yr | Radial artery occlusions at day 1: 5/942 Radial artery occlusions at 1 year: 3/942 Change in handgrip strength test: 0/942 Ischemic vascular or bleeding complications: 0/942 |
Van Leeuwen et al[24] | Quick DASH questionnaire and CISS questionnaire. Patients were asked to describe any procedure-related extremity complaints or loss of function at 1 mo | Pre, 30 d and 1 yr post procedure | Temporary upper limb complaint (< 30 d): 26/286 (9%) Persisting upper limb complaint (> 30 d): 31/286 (11%) Pain: 13/286 Numbness: 2/286 Tingling: 3/286 Stiffness: 2/286 Less power: 2/286 Upper limb function by QuickDASH at 30 d: No change over time, baseline 4.55 (IQR 0-13.64), follow up 2.27 (IQR 0-9.32) Upper limb function by CISS at 30 d: No change over time Upper limb function by QuickDASH at 1 yr: no change over time, baseline 2.39 (IQR 0-13.64), follow up 0 (0-11.02) Cold intolerance was not associated with access route at 1 yr |
Wu et al[37] | Ultrasound assessment for radial artery occlusion, aneurysm or dissection. Grip strength based on dynamometer results. Palmar pinch, key pinch and tip pinch strength tests were assessed by dynamic endurance test | Late follow up 315 d | Hand complication in hospital: 0/40 Radial occlusion: 1/40 Late radial occlusions: 5/34 Radial artery aneurysm: 0/40 Radial artery dissection 0/40 Grip strength: Baseline 68 ± 34, post-catheterization 69 ± 35 Palmar pinch: Baseline 18 ± 10, post-catheterization 17 ± 6 Key pinch: Baseline 19 ± 7, post-catheterization 19 ± 6 Tip pinch: Baseline 14 ± 6, post-catheterization 14 ± 4 Endurance: Median for 6 Fr and 8 Fr is 78 (IQR 53, 108) and 58 (IQR 32, 68) respectively, post-catheterization 58 (IQR 47, 84) and 56 (IQR 38, 80), respectively |
Zankl et al[34] | Assessment with ultrasound | 4 wk follow up | Radial artery occlusion at 1 d: 51/488 Persistent radial artery occlusion at 4 wk: 21/488 Radial nerve paralysis: 1/488 |
Table 3 Summary of pooled results for hand dysfunction or vascular complications post transradial procedure
Hand dysfunction or vascular complication | No. of studies | No of events | No of participants | Percentage of events |
Nerve damage | 3[26,27,34] | 1 | 638 | 0.16% |
Sensory loss, tingling and numbness | 5[24,28,29,31,35] | 29 | 1903 | 1.52% |
Pain | 3[24,26,35] | 108 | 1619 | 6.67% |
Hand function, disability, grip strength change, stiffness, power loss and hand complications | 6[24,30,32,33,37,39] | 4 | 1560 | 0.26% |
Vascular complications including occlusions, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm and dissection | 6[29,31,32,35,37,39] | 54 | 1762 | 3.06% |
Radial artery occlusion | 5[31,33,34,37,39] | 40 | 1663 | 2.41% |
Table 4 Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire
No difficulty | Mild difficulty | Moderate difficulty | Severe difficulty | Unable | |
1 Open a tight or new jar | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2 Do heavy house hold chores eg. Wash walls, floors | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
3 Carry a shopping bag or briefcase | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
4 Wash your back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
5 Use a knife to cut food | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
6 Recreational activities in which you take some force or impact through your arm shoulder or hand | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
7 During the past week to what extent has your arm, shoulder or hand problem interfered with your normal social activities with family, friends, neighbors or groups? | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
8 During the past week, were you limited in your work or other daily activities as a result of your arm, shoulder or hand problem? | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
9 Arm, shoulder or hand pain | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
10 Tingling | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
11 Sleep | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Table 5 Cold Intolerance symptoms severity Questionnaire
Questions | Score |
Which of the following symptoms of cold intolerance do you experience in your injured limb on exposure to cold? | |
Pain, numbness, stiffness, weakness, aching, skin colour change (white/bluish white/blue) | |
How often do you experience these symptoms? (Please tick) | |
Continuously/all the time | |
Several times a day | |
Once a day | |
Once a week | |
Once a month or less | |
Never | |
When you develop cold induced symptoms, on your return to a warm environment are the symptoms relieved? (Please tick) | |
Not applicably | |
Within a few minutes | |
Within 30 min | |
After more than 30 min | |
What do you do to ease or prevent your symptoms occurring? (Please tick) | |
Take no special action | |
Keep hand in pocket | |
Wear gloves in cold weather | |
Wear gloves all the time | |
Avoid cold weather/stay indoors | |
Other (please specify) | |
How much does cold bother your injured hand in the following situations? (Please score 0-10) | |
Holding a glass of ice water | |
Holding a frozen package from the freezer | |
Washing in cold water | |
When you get out of a hot bath/shower with air room temperature | |
During cold wintry weather | |
Please state how each of the following activities have been affected as a consequence of cold induced symptoms in your injured hand and score each (please score 0-4) | |
Domestic chores | |
Hobbies and interests | |
Dressing and undressing | |
Tying your |
Table 6 Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
A: Symptom severity scale (11 items) | |||||
1 How severe is the hand or wrist pain that you have at night? | Normal | Slight | Medium | Serious | Very serious |
2 How often did hand or wrist pain wake you up during a typical night in the past two weeks? | Normal | Once | 2-3 | 4-5 | > 5 |
3 Do you typically have pain in your hand or wrist during the daytime? | No Pain | Slight | Medium | Serious | Very Serious |
4 How often do you have hand or wrist pain during daytime? | Normal | 1-2 times/d | 1 times/d | > 5 times/d | Continued |
5 How long on average does an episode of pain last during the daytime? | Normal | < 10 min | 10-60 continued | > 60 min | Continued |
6 Do you have numbness (loss of sensation) in your hand? | Normal | Slight | Medium | Severe | Very Serious |
7 Do you have weakness in your hand or wrist? | Normal | Slight | Medium | Severe | Very Serious |
8 Do you have tingling sensations in your hand? | Normal | Slight | Medium | Severe | Very Serious |
9 How severe is numbness (loss of sensation) or tingling at night? | Normal | Slight | Medium | Severe | Very Serious |
10 How often did hand numbness or tingling wake you up during a typical night during the past two weeks? | Normal | Once | 2-3 times | 4-5 times | > 5 |
11 Do you have difficulty with the grasping and use of small objects such as keys or pens? | Without difficulty | Little difficulty | Moderate difficulty | Very difficulty | Very difficult |
B: Functional status scale (8 items) | |||||
Writing | |||||
Buttoning of cloths | |||||
Holding a book while reading | |||||
Gripping of a telephone handle | |||||
Opening of jars | |||||
House hold chores | |||||
Carrying of grocery basket | |||||
Bathing and dressing |
- Citation: Ul Haq MA, Rashid M, Kwok CS, Wong CW, Nolan J, Mamas MA. Hand dysfunction after transradial artery catheterization for coronary procedures. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(7): 609-619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i7/609.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i7.609