Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2017; 9(5): 422-428
Published online May 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i5.422
Published online May 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i5.422
Ref. | Design | No. of patients | Inclusion/exclusion criteria | Type of monitoring | Outcome | Comments |
Higgins et al[14] (2013) | RCT | 100 | Inclusion: Ischaemic stroke within 7 d; Exclusion: History of AF | 7-d event recorder vs 24-h ECG (control) | Detection of AF: Sustained (> 20 s) and non-sustained (minimum 6 beats) | Sustained AF detected in 18% (control 2%); Non-sustained AF in 44% (control 4%) |
Gladstone et al[15] (2014) | RCT | 572 | Inclusion: Cryptogenic stroke, Age ≥ 55 yr; Exclusion: History of AF | 30-d triggered event recorder vs 24-h ECG (control) | Detection of AF (> 30 s) | AF detected in 16.1% (control 3.2%) |
Sanna et al[16] (2014) | RCT | 441 | Inclusion: Cryptogenic stroke, Age ≥ 40 yr; Exclusion: History of AF (including 24-h ECG) | Insertable cardiac monitor vs Standard care (control) | Detection of AF (> 30 s) | At 6 mo, AF detected in 8.9% (control 1.4%) At 12 mo, AF detected in 12.4% (control 2.0%) At 36 mo, AF detected in 30% (control 3.0%) |
Brachmann et al[17] (2016) |
- Citation: Battipaglia I, O’Neill J, Hogarth AJ, Tayebjee MH. Empirical anticoagulation for patients in sinus rhythm at high risk of ischaemic stroke: A review of current literature. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(5): 422-428
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i5/422.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i5.422