Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Nov 26, 2017; 9(11): 807-812
Published online Nov 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i11.807
Published online Nov 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i11.807
Table 1 Clinical and angiographic profiles of Safeguard Radial vs TR band groups at baseline-total patient cohort
| Variables | Safeguard radial, n = 42 | TR band, n = 42 | P value |
| Age, years | 63.8 ± 10.9 | 66.8 ± 10.8 | 0.21 |
| Gender, male/female ratio | 31/11 | 37/5 | 0.16 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 29.2 ± 3.9 | 29.0 ± 5.7 | 0.88 |
| Diabetes | 4 (10%) | 8 (19%) | 0.22 |
| CKD | 1 (2%) | 2 (5%) | 0.56 |
| PAD | 0% | 1 (2%) | 0.32 |
| Indication | |||
| Elective | 18 | 16 | 0.88 |
| UA | 6 | 8 | 0.9 |
| NSTEMI | 13 | 8 | 0.7 |
| STEMI | 5 | 10 | 0.6 |
Table 2 Procedural profiles of Safeguard Radial vs TR band groups
| Variables | Safeguard radial, n = 42 | TR band, n = 42 | P value |
| Pre-procedure | |||
| IR verapamil, % | (86%) | (83%) | 0.77 |
| IR nitroglycerine, % | (31%) | (45%) | 0.18 |
| Procedural | |||
| Heparin, IU | 7778 ± 2704 | 7825 ± 2450 | 0.94 |
| Number of target vessels treated with PCI | |||
| 1 | |||
| 2 | 39 | 39 | 1 |
| ≥ 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Target vessels | |||
| LM | 1 | 0 | 0.98 |
| LAD/Diagonal | 19 | 22 | 0.87 |
| LCx/OM | 7 | 7 | 0.96 |
| RCA | 18 | 12 | 0.64 |
| IM | 0 | 2 | 0.77 |
| VG | 0 | 2 | 0.77 |
| Fluoroscopy times, min | 15.3 ± 8.4 | 15.0 ± 6.9 | 0.88 |
| Post-procedure | |||
| GP2B3A inhibitor, % | 1 (2%) | 0% | 0.32 |
| ACT ( s ) | 197 ± 38 | 197 ± 47 | 0.97 |
Table 3 Post-procedural outcomes in Safeguard Radial vs TR band groups
| Variables | Safeguard radial, n = 42 | TR band, n = 42 | P value |
| Bleeding requiring blood transfusion/surgical intervention | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| Hematoma | 7% | 0% | 0.07 |
| Pain/numbness | 2% | 0% | 0.32 |
| Radial artery occlusion at 24 h | 2% | 0% | 0.32 |
| Radial artery occlusion at 6 wk | 0% | 0% | 1 |
- Citation: Voon V, AyyazUlHaq M, Cahill C, Mannix K, Ahern C, Hennessy T, SamerArnous, Kiernan T. Randomized study comparing incidence of radial artery occlusion post-percutaneous coronary intervention between two conventional compression devices using a novel air-inflation technique. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(11): 807-812
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i11/807.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i11.807
