Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Dec 26, 2012; 4(12): 341-346
Published online Dec 26, 2012. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i12.341
Published online Dec 26, 2012. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i12.341
Table 1 Baseline criteria of all patients
| Total (n = 55) | GroupI(n = 35) | Group II (n = 20) | P value | |
| Age | 59.4 ± 13.6 | 61.0 ± 9.9 | 57.7 ± 16.9 | 0.4 |
| Gender, n (%) | 0.8 | |||
| Male | 29 (72.5%) | 14 (70%) | 15 (75%) | |
| Female | 11 (27.5%) | 6 (30%) | 5 (25%) | |
| IVS (mm) | 10.3 ± 2.4 | 9.4 ± 2.1 | 11.3 ± 2.4 | 0.01 |
| PW (mm) | 9.8 ± 1.7 | 9.4 ± 1.5 | 10.2 ± 1.9 | 0.1 |
| LV mass | 245.4 ± 99.5 | 254.9 ± 108.9 | 235.3 ± 90.6 | 0.5 |
| LA diameter (mm) | 38.3 ± 6.6 | 40.2 ± 6.4 | 36.3 ± 6.3 | 0.07 |
| LVDD (mm) | 51.2 ± 9.8 | 55.2 ± 11.6 | 49.0 ± 5.1 | 0.009 |
| LVSD (mm) | 36.4 ± 11.9 | 41.3 ± 14.1 | 30.2 ± 5.3 | 0.008 |
| LV-FS (%) | 30.0 ± 11.1 | 26.4 ± 11.9 | 34.9 ± 7.1 | 0.03 |
| LVDV (mL) | 119.4 ± 65.7 | 137.9 ± 85.8 | 99.9 ± 20.8 | 0.07 |
| LVSV (mL) | 65.7 ± 60.8 | 87.3 ± 77.3 | 40.9 ± 20.1 | 0.02 |
| LV-EF (%) | 49.9 ± 15.0 | 41.9 ± 14.1 | 59.7 ± 8.1 | 0.0001 |
| WM score | 20.6 ± 6.4 | 24.9 ± 6.4 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0001 |
| WM score index | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 1.6 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0001 |
| Global LS | -11.8 ± 6.7 | -9.3 ± 7.1 | -15.6 ± 3.7 | 0.02 |
Table 2 Intra-observer correlation and variability of segmental analysis by visual analysis and automatic function imaging
| Wall motion score | Speckle tracking (AFI) | |||||
| Total | GroupI | Group II | Total | GroupI | Group II | |
| (n = 55) | (n = 35) | (n = 20) | (n = 55) | (n = 35) | (n = 20) | |
| 1st reading | 20.6 ± 6.4 | 24.9 ± 6.4 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | -11.8 ± 6.7 | -9.3 ± 7.1 | -15.6 ± 3.7 |
| 2nd reading | 22.6 ± 8.7 | 27.3 ± 5.9 | 17.7 ± 2.9 | -13.6 ± 5.5 | -11.3 ± 5.6 | -15.6 ± 4.8 |
| Correlation | R = 0.73, P = 0.03 | R = 0.9, P < 0.0001 | ||||
| MD | 2.1 ± 5.9 | 2.4 ± 5.9 | 1.7 ± 2.9 | -0.02 ± 2.0 | -0.0 ± 2.3 | -0.0 ± 1.9 |
Table 3 Summarized comparison between automatic function imaging and visual analysis of wall motion abnormalities
| Visual analysis | AFI | |
| Analysis time (min) | 3.5 ± 1.9 | 3.9 ± 2.1 |
| Complete analysis (%) | 94.10 | 96.30 |
| Intra-observer mean difference | ||
| Normal subjects | 1.7 ± 2.9 | -0.0 ± 1.9 |
| Abnormal subjects | 2.4 ± 5.9 | -0.0 ± 2.3 |
- Citation: Anwar AM. Global and segmental myocardial deformation by 2D speckle tracking compared to visual assessment. World J Cardiol 2012; 4(12): 341-346
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v4/i12/341.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v4.i12.341
