Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Cardiol. Nov 26, 2025; 17(11): 109287
Published online Nov 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i11.109287
Published online Nov 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i11.109287
Table 1 General data on the included patients, n (%)
| Characteristic | Overall (n = 128) | Observation group (n = 55) | Control group (n = 73) | P value |
| Age (year), mean ± SD | 63 ± 10 | 62 ± 11 | 64 ± 6 | 0.42 |
| Male | 95 (74) | 40 (73) | 67 (92) | 0.09 |
| Type of lesion | 0.71 | |||
| Non-STEMI | 95 (74) | 40 (73) | 55 (76) | |
| STEMI | 33 (26) | 15 (27) | 18 (24) | |
| Heart rate (bpm), mean ± SD | 72 ± 16 | 71 ± 16 | 72 ± 17 | 0.01 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg), mean ± SD | 114 ± 21 | 114 ± 20 | 119 ± 22 | 0.27 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg), mean ± SD | 73 ± 16 | 71 ± 9 | 76 ± 7 | 0.14 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%), mean ± SD | 47 ± 10 | 47 ± 10 | 47 ± 11 | 0.47 |
| Creatinine (mmol/L), mean ± SD | 72 ± 22 | 72 ± 24 | 79 ± 10 | 0.21 |
| Pulmonary arterial hypertension | 15 (12) | 6 (11) | 9 (12) | 0.62 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 22 (17) | 9 (16) | 13 (18) | 0.76 |
| Dyslipidemia | 42 (33) | 17 (31) | 25 (34) | 0.22 |
| Smoking | 42 (33) | 24 (44) | 18 (25) | 0.62 |
| Family history of coronary artery disease | 44 (34) | 19 (35) | 25 (34) | 0.42 |
| Antithrombotics | ||||
| Aspirin | 92 (72) | 34 (62) | 58 (79) | - |
| Clopidogrel | 46 (36) | 20 (36) | 26 (36) | 1.00 |
| Direct oral anticoagulant | 6 (5) | 2 (4) | 4 (5) | 0.42 |
Table 2 General information on the lesions, n (%)
| Characteristic | Number of lesions (n = 201) | BRS treatment (n = 87) | DES treatment (n = 114) | P value |
| Treated blood vessels | 0.80 | |||
| Left anterior descending artery | 103 (51) | 43 (49) | 49 (43) | |
| Left circumflex artery | 46 (23) | 19 (22) | 33 (29) | |
| Right coronary artery | 52 (26) | 25 (19) | 32 (28) | |
| Type of lesion | 0.96 | |||
| A | 52 (26) | 20 (23) | 32 (28) | |
| B1 | 70 (35) | 32 (37) | 38 (33) | |
| B2 | 79 (39) | 35 (40) | 44 (39) | |
| Initial TIMI flow | 0.28 | |||
| 0 | 53 (26) | 27 (31) | 26 (23) | |
| 1 | 14 (7) | 6 (7) | 8 (7) | |
| 2 | 15 (8) | 7 (8) | 8 (7) | |
| 3 | 119 (59) | 47 (54) | 72 (63) | |
| Final TIMI flow | ||||
| 2 | 5 (2) | 3 (3) | 2 (2) | - |
| 3 | 196 (98) | 84 (97) | 112 (98) | - |
| Number of stents per lesion (bpm), mean ± SD | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.72 ± 0.38 | 1.21 ± 0.41 | 0.34 |
| Predilation | 201 (100) | 87 (100) | 114 (100) | - |
| Average stent diameter (mm), mean ± SD | 3.25 ± 0.25 | 3.3 ± 0.25 | 3.3 ± 0.21 | 0.32 |
| Average stent length (mm), mean ± SD | 21.1 ± 2.3 | 22.6 ± 3.3 | 21.7 ± 2.5 | 0.13 |
Table 3 Clinical follow-up outcome, n (%)
| Clinical outcome | 6 months | 1 year | 2 years | 3 years | ||||||||
| Observation group | Control group | P value | Observation group | Control group | P value | Observation group | Control group | P value | Observation group | Control group | P value | |
| Follow-up patients | 52 (95) | 69 (95) | 0.65 | 48 (87) | 63 (86) | 0.73 | 43 (78) | 60 (82) | 0.14 | 32 (37) | 46 (40) | 0.34 |
| Main end point | ||||||||||||
| DoCE | 2 (4) | 3 (4) | 0.19 | 7 (15) | 6 (10) | 0.03a | 9 (31) | 11 (13) | 0.08 | 5 (16) | 7 (15) | 0.22 |
| CD | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0.52 | 1 (3) | 2 (4) | 0.18 |
| ScT | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | 0.84 | 2 (4) | 2 (3) | 0.53 | 2 (7) | 3 (5) | 0.14 | 3 (9) | 5 (11) | 0.34 |
| TV-MI | 1 (2) | 1 (1) | 0.75 | 2 (4) | 2 (3) | 0.07 | 2 (5) | 3 (5) | 0.12 | 2 (6) | 4 (8) | 0.07 |
| TLR | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - | 3 (6) | 3 (5) | 0.35 | 4 (9) | 4 (7) | 0.06 | 3 (9) | 5 (11) | 0.53 |
| Secondary end point | ||||||||||||
| TVR | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - | 1 (2) | 2 (5) | 0.01a | 2 (6) | 2 (4) | 0.33 |
| CBG | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - | 1 (3) | 0 (0) | 0.85 |
| Non-cardiogenic death | 0 (0) | 2 (3) | 0.65 | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 0.11 | 2(5) | 1 (2) | 0.73 | 1 (3) | 2 (4) | 0.49 |
Table 4 Comparison of serum inflammatory levels before and after treatment in the two groups of patients, mean ± SD
| Group | IL-6 (μg/L) | CRP (pg/mL) | TNF-α (ng/L) | MMP-9 (ng/L) | |
| Observation group | PCI postoperative | 8.4 ± 1.7 | 78.9 ± 17.0 | 129.2 ± 20.1 | 16.9 ± 1.1 |
| Review after 1 month | 6.0 ± 1.0 | 41.7 ± 6.4 | 112.9 ± 14.0 | 14.9 ± 1.1 | |
| t (P value) | 11.2 (0.21) | 19.2 (0.01a) | 9.4 (0.07) | 17.0 (0.08) | |
| Control group | PCI postoperative | 8.4 ± 1.4 | 76.1 ± 18.9 | 124.1 ± 14.7 | 16.3 ± 1.8 |
| Review after 1 month | 4.7 ± 2.4 | 23.0 ± 7.9 | 83.7 ± 10.8 | 12.3 ± 0.7 | |
| t (P value) | 22.0 (0.01a) | 24.3 (< 0.01a) | 24.0 (0.01a) | 20.2 (0.12) | |
- Citation: Li J, Li XR, Kong MW, Zhang J. Medium-to-long term outcomes of bioresorbable scaffold treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome. World J Cardiol 2025; 17(11): 109287
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v17/i11/109287.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i11.109287
