Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2020; 12(1): 7-25
Published online Jan 26, 2020. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i1.7
Published online Jan 26, 2020. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i1.7
Table 1 Conditions that contribute to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
| Obesity |
| Hypertension |
| Coronary artery disease |
| Atrial fibrillation |
| Diabetes mellitus |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
| Obstructive sleep apnea |
| Anemia |
Table 2 Clinical characteristics of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure and reduced ejection fraction
| HFpEF | HFrEF | |
| Sex | Women (62%) | Men (60%) |
| Age (yr) | 74 | 70 |
| Obesity | 41.4% | 35.5% |
| Diabetes mellitus | 45% | 40% |
| Hypertension | 77% | 69% |
| Chronic kidney disease | 56% | 45% |
| Coronary artery disease | 50%` | 59% |
| Prior myocardial infarction | 24% | 36% |
| LV remodeling | Concentric | Eccentric |
| LV ejection fraction | ≥ 50% | < 40% |
| Atrial fibrillation in hospitalized patients | 65% | 53% |
| Ventricular dysrhythmias | 3% | 11% |
| Hospitalizations for heart failure | Increasing | Decreasing |
| Therapies that decrease mortality | None at present time | Beta-Blockers, ACE inhibitors, biventricular pacemakers, coronary revascularization |
Table 3 Echocardiographic indices of diastolic dysfunction
| 1. The ratio of the mitral blood flow velocity into the LV in early diastole (the E wave) to peak blood flow velocity in late diastole caused by atrial contraction (the A wave), or the E/A ratio, ≥ 2. The normal E/A is approximately 0.8. However, tachycardia, atrioventricular block, and left bundle branch block can lead to fusion of E and A waves, and ambiguity in diastolic function assessment. |
| 2. Increased left atrial pressure measured by early mitral blood flow velocity across the mitral valve (E wave) to the early diastolic velocity (e’) of the lateral mitral annulus, or E/e’ ratio. An E/e’ ratio 10 = mild and E/e’ ratio > 14 = significant LV dysfunction. If the lateral mitral annulus e' velocity is not quantifiable, the septal mitral annular e' velocity can be used. In this case, the E/e’ is increased if the ratio is > 15. |
| 3. Lateral mitral annular e’ velocity < 10 cm/s or septal e’ mitral annular velocity < 7 cm/s. |
| 4. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 35 mmHg indicative of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure = 4 × (peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity)2 + estimated right atrial pressure. These criteria should not be used in patients with significant pulmonary disease. |
| 5. An echocardiographic determination of global longitudinal strain of -16.05 ± 2.16. This measurement can separate patients with HFpEF from patients with hypertension and normal controls in whom the global longitudinal strain measurements are -18.58 ± 2.84 and -19.59 ± 1.49, respectively. |
Table 4 Heart failure preserved ejection fraction scoring system: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
| Clinical characteristic | Clinical measurement | Points awarded |
| Heavy | Body mass index > 30 kg/m2 | Two |
| Hypertension | Two or more hypertensive medications | One |
| Atrial fibrillation | Paroxysmal or persistent | Three |
| Pulmonary hypertension by echocardiogram | Pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 35 mmhg | One |
| Elderly | Age > 60 yr | One |
| LV filling pressure by echocardiogram | Echocardiographic e/e’ > 9 | One |
Table 5 Survival after cardiac magnetic resonance determined extracellular volume determination
| CMR ECV | Year one | Year two | Year three | Year four |
| ECV < 25% | 95.8% | 95.8% | 95.8% | 82.1% |
| 25% ≤ ECV < 30% | 95.5% | 90.5% | 87.6% | 81.1% |
| 30% ≤ ECV < 35% | 88.0% | 77.3% | 69.6% | 65% |
| 35% > ECV < 40% | 82.2% | 74.3% | 69.4% | 61.7% |
| ECV ≤ 40% | 40.0% | 40.0% | 40.0% | 40.0% |
| Cardiac amyloid | 47.1% | 23.5% | 0% | 0% |
Table 6 Pharmacologic studies in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
| Ref. | Drug vs control | Drug half-life hours | Number patients | Duration | LVEF | Results |
| Beta-blockers | ||||||
| Swedish Heart Failure Registry[81] | All BBs (prescribed at discharge | 6-h Atenolol; 12-19 h Nevibolol | 8244 | 755 d | LVEF 49%-50% and LVEF > 50% | β-blockers decreased mortality but not combined all-cause mortality or hospitalizations |
| SWEDIC Trial[82] | Carvedilol | 6-10 h | 97 | 6 mo | LVEF ≥ 40% | E/A ratio improved but no other measures of diastolic function |
| J-DHF Trial[83] | Carvedilol | 6-10 h | 245 | 38 mo | LVEF ≥ 40% | Standard dose, but not low dose, carvedilol reduced; CV mortality and hospitalizations |
| COHERE Registry[84] | Carvedilol | 6-10 h | 4280 | 12 mo | LVEF > 40% | Carvedilol had no mortality benefit but decreased hospitalization |
| SENIORS[85,86] | Nebivolol | 2.5-20 h | 643 | 21 mo | LVEF > 35% | Nebivolol did not decrease CV hospitalizations or mortality |
| ELANDD Trial[87] | Nebivolol | 2.5-20 h | 116 | 21 mo | LVEF ≥ 45% | Nebivolol did not increase exercise capacity |
| CIBIS-ELD Trial[88] | Bisoprolol vs Carvedilol | 9-12 vs 6-10 h | 250 | 3 mo | LVEF ≥ 45% | Bisoprolol and carvedilol had no effect on established and prognostic markers of diastolic function |
| El-Refai et al[89] | Beta Blocker (bisoprolol, carvedilol, metoprolol, labetalol, and atenolol) | 6-7 h (Atenolol); 9-12 h (Bisoprolol) | 741 | 25 mo | LVEF ≥ 50% | Beta blockers decreased mortality and HF rehospitalizations |
| β-PRESERVE[90] | Metoprolol succinate vs control | 3-9 h | 1200 | 24 mo | LVEF ≥ 50% | Trial Results not available |
| OPTIMIZE-HF[91] | All BBs (prescribed at discharge) | 6-7 h Atenolol 12-19 h Nebivolol | 21149 | 3 mo | LVEF 40%-49% and ≥ 50% | Beta blockers had no effect on mortality and rehospitalization |
| Calcium channel blockers | ||||||
| Setaro et al[92] | Verapamil vs placebo | 4.5-12 h | 20 | 1 mo | LVEF ≥ 45% | Verapamil increased exercise capacity clinicoradio-graphic score. No change in LVEF. |
| Hung et al[93] | Verapamil vs placebo | 4.5-12 h | 15 | 3 mo | Normal LVEF | Verapamil increased exercise time and LV diastolic function |
| ACE inhibitors | ||||||
| Aronow et al[94] | Enalapril vs control (diuretics alone) | 11 h | 21 | 3 mo | LVEF ≥ 50% | Enalapril increased exercise time and LVEF |
| PEP-CHF trial[95] | ACE inhibitor (perindopril) vs placebo | 3-10 h with prolonged terminal elimination | 207 | 12 mo | LVEF ≥ 45% | Perindopril increased 6 min walk distance but did not decrease mortality |
| Angiotensin II receptor blockers | ||||||
| I-PRESERVE[96] | Irbesartan vs placebo | 11-15 h | 4563 | 24 mo | LVEF ≥ 45% | No decrease in hospitalization or mortality |
| CHARM-Preserved[97] | Candesartan vs control medication (ACE Inhibitor, BB, CCB) | 9 h | 3023 | 37 mo | LVEF ≥ 40% | Candesartan slightly decreased hospitalizations but did not decrease mortality |
| Angiotensin receptor blocker/nephrilysin inhibitors | ||||||
| PARAMOUNT Trial[98] | Sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan | 11.5 h | 301 | 3 and 8-9 mo | LVEF ≥ 45% | Sacubiril Valsartan reduced NT-proBNP |
| PARAGON-HF Governmental Trial NCT01920711 | Sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan | 11.5 | 4300 | 57 mo | LVEF ≥ 45% | Sacubitril/valsartan not superior to valsartan alone in decreasing hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality |
| Ivabradine | ||||||
| Kosmala et al[99] | Ivabradine vs placebo | 11 h | 61 | 7 d | LVEF ≥ 50% | Ivabradine increased exercise time, peak oxygen uptake, and decreased E/e’ |
| EDIFY trial[100] | Ivabradine vs placebo | 11 h | 179 | 8 mo | LVEF ≥ 45% | No improvement in 6 min walk, E/e’, or NT-proBNP |
| Statins | ||||||
| Fukuta et al[101] | Standard HF therapy with a statin vs without a statin | 2 h (lovastatin)-19 h (rosuvastatin) | 137 | 21 mo | LVEF ≥ 50% | Statin therapy associated with reduced mortality |
| Ouzounian et al[102] | Standard HF therapy with a statin vs without a statin | 2 h (lovastatin)-19 h (rosuvastatin) | 6451 | 38 mo | LVEF ≥ 50% | Statins did not decrease morbidity or mortality in patients with HF without CAD |
| Animal model of heart ailure (rats)[103] | Standard HF therapy with rosuvastatin vs without rosuvastatin | 19 h | 46 | 19 mo | Preserved EF | Statins had no benefit |
| Digoxin | ||||||
| (DIG) trial[104] | Digoxin vs placebo | 36-48 h | 988 | 37 mo | LVEF ≥ 45% | Digoxin had no effect on all-cause and CV mortality, heart failure hospitalizations |
| Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors | ||||||
| RELAX trial[105] | Sildenafil vs placebo | 3-4 h | 216 | 24 mo | LVEF ≥ 50% | No improvement in 6 min walk distance, clinical status, or peak O2 consumption |
| Nitrates | ||||||
| NEAT-HFpEF trial[106] | Isosorbide mononitrate vs placebo | 2.5-5.1 h | 110 | 22 mo | LVEF ≥ 50% | No improvement in 6 min walk distance or NT-proBNP |
| INDIE-HFpEF[107,108] | Inhaled inorganic nitrite vs placebo | 0.7 h | 105 | 4 wk | LVEF ≥ 50% | No significant improvement in exercise tolerance, NY Heart Association Class, E/e’, NT-proBNP |
| Governmental trial NCT02840799 | Oral KNO3 vs KCL | 1.2 h | 26 | 1 mo | LVEF ≥ 50% | KNO3 trial is in progress |
- Citation: Henning RJ. Diagnosis and treatment of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. World J Cardiol 2020; 12(1): 7-25
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v12/i1/7.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v12.i1.7
