BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review Open Access
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2026; 18(7): 119678
Published online Jul 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.119678
Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram to non-cardiovascular diseases
Wen-Hua Song, Xing-Liang Wu, Gary Tse, Tong Liu, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
Gary Tse, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong 000000, China
ORCID number: Gary Tse (0000-0001-5510-1253); Tong Liu (0000-0003-0482-0738).
Co-first authors: Wen-Hua Song and Xing-Liang Wu.
Author contributions: Song WH and Wu XL conceived the study and wrote the paper as co-first authors; Tse G edited and revised the manuscript; Liu T reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
AI contribution statement: We confirm that no AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript. Specifically, no AI tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or DeepL were used; no portion of the main text (Abstract, Introduction, Discussion, and Conclusion) was AI-generated; no AI tool was used for language polishing, translation or writing assistance; no AI tool participated in the design of this opinion review; and no images in the manuscript were generated by AI.
Supported by Tianjin Key Medical Discipline Construction Project, No. TJYXZDXK-3-006B.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Tong Liu, PhD, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, No. 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300211, China. liutongdoc@126.com
Received: February 5, 2026
Revised: March 17, 2026
Accepted: June 10, 2026
Published online: July 26, 2026
Processing time: 167 Days and 18.2 Hours

Abstract

The proliferation of electronic health records has prompted the development of healthcare big data and application of artificial intelligence (AI) for clinical diagnosis and treatment. AI-electrocardiogram (AI-ECG), valued for its non-invasive nature, operational simplicity, and broad accessibility, has demonstrated considerable utility in disease identification and management. Importantly, the scope of AI-ECG is not confined to cardiovascular diseases. A growing body of evidence highlights its additional value for non-cardiovascular conditions such as diabetes, liver diseases, kidney diseases, infectious diseases and electrolyte imbalances. This opinion review summarizes the research progress of AI-ECG in non-cardiovascular diseases and discusses its clinical implications to guide attention towards these novel applications.

Key Words: Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Electrocardiogram; Application; Non-cardiovascular diseases

Core Tip: This article systematically reviews the latest advances in artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram for the diagnosis and evaluation of non-cardiovascular diseases. It summarizes its value in identifying and predicting risks across various conditions, including liver and kidney diseases, pulmonary embolism, and electrolyte disturbances. The opinion review also discusses the strengths, limitations, and future directions of this technology, aiming to inform clinicians and support clinical decision-making.



INTRODUCTION

The electrocardiogram (ECG) has long served as a fundamental tool in clinical diagnostics, primarily used to identify rhythm abnormalities such as arrhythmias and disturbances of cardiac conduction, as well as conditions such as myocardial infarction[1]. A broader physiological perspective, however, makes clear that the ECG is not merely an isolated record of cardiac activity. The tracing is shaped by the systemic internal environment because myocardial depolarization and repolarization are sensitive to changes in autonomic tone, serum electrolyte concentrations, acid-base balance, and endocrine states. In addition, many medications can modify ion channel behavior and thereby alter waveform morphology and timing[2]. Although such effects are often subtle, nonspecific, or treated as contextual variation in routine practice, they can represent measurable reflections of systemic physiology. The heart is embedded within neurohumoral and metabolic networks, and its electrical activity can register disturbances that arise well beyond the cardiovascular system[3]. Thus, ECGs have been used for the diagnosis, risk stratification and prognostication beyond cardiovascular diseases.

The rapid expansion of electronic health records and large-scale medical datasets has accelerated the application of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning, across clinical medicine, yielding the field of healthcare big data[4-6]. This data environment has also enabled the development of AI-ECG, in which models learn directly from raw voltage time signals rather than relying only on conventional, human defined measurements such as intervals and predefined morphological patterns. By analyzing the full waveform, AI-ECG approaches can integrate subtle morphology and temporal context that are difficult to capture with prespecified rules. The outputs are typically framed in forms that can support clinical decisions, including risk estimates and continuous surrogates that relate to laboratory values or other reference measures[1,7-9]. In parallel, expectations for credible progress have become more stringent. High performance in a single dataset is no longer sufficient. Contemporary studies increasingly require explicit phenotype definitions, validation in independent cohorts drawn from diverse populations, and a clear statement of intended clinical use so that model outputs can be interpreted, calibrated, and assessed within realistic care pathways[10].

Against this methodological backdrop, the scope of AI-ECG has expanded beyond classical cardiovascular endpoints to include non-cardiovascular diseases (non-CVD). In these settings, the near-term clinical application is more often supportive than substitutive. The goal is typically to aid earlier recognition, triage, and prioritization of confirmatory testing rather than to replace definitive laboratory assays or specialist assessment[11]. Early studies have reported potential utility in several non-CVD conditions, including electrolyte imbalance, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and thyroid dysfunction[12-14]. In this opinion review, we discuss the research by Karbovskaya et al[15] recently published in World Journal of Cardiology. The authors presented a model that accurately detects diabetes mellitus (DM) from a single-lead ECG. This study has contributed to the development of the AI-ECG model as a reliable screening tool for non-CVD in high-risk populations. Therefore, we summarize the latest advances of AI-ECG in non-CVD (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Potential applications of artificial intelligence-electrocardiogram model in non-cardiovascular diseases. AI-ECG: Artificial intelligence-electrocardiogram.
AI-ECG IN DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF NON-CVD
DM

DM is a clinical condition that causes a high amount of glucose in the blood with a simultaneous lack of insulin or insulin resistance. In 2024, approximately 589 million adults were living with diabetes, and this number is projected to rise to 853 million by 2050[16]. Given the large patient population and complications involving multiple systems, the development of diabetes management optimization tools holds great clinical value. A prior study with a small sample size proposed a machine learning model using discrete wavelet transform features extracted from ECG[17]. The findings indicated that this approach could be used to identification of patients with DM and healthy control. Decision tree reached an accuracy of 92.02%, sensitivity of 92.59% and specificity of 91.46%. Another study from Karbovskaya et al[15] demonstrates a model by identifying a specific clinical profile (high comorbidity burden with preserved cardiac function) could accurately detects DM from a single-lead ECG achieving robust performance [area under the curve (AUC): 0.880]. Patients with DM have significant fluctuations in their blood glucose levels. Both excessively high and excessively low blood glucose can lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Cichosz et al[18] developed a fuzzy reasoning method based on hybrid particle swarm optimization for detecting hypoglycemic events at night. The study included overnight ECG records of children with type 1 diabetes, correlating heart rate and QTc with hypoglycemic events. The results showed that the model was able to detect severe hypoglycemic events (with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 79.87%). Conventional methods for diabetes testing and management, such as continuous glucose monitoring and hemoglobin A1c measurement, are invasive and often costly. A growing body of evidence suggests that ECG signals could serve as a convenient, non-invasive tool for screening and managing patients with DM.

Liver diseases

Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of machine learning in healthcare and highlighted the value of ECG in detecting systemic conditions[19]. Cardiovascular and hepatic diseases share several common pathophysiological mechanisms and pathways, and the heart and liver interact closely. For instance, in heart failure, cardiac dysfunction can lead to hepatic congestion, while liver impairment resulting in portal hypertension may further increase cardiac burden. Growing evidence suggests that AI-enhanced ECG holds promise for the prediction and management of liver disease. A machine learning model was developed using ECG features from two large-scale datasets, MIMIC-IV-ECG and ECG-View II, for the identification of liver diseases[20]. The model was trained and internally validated on over 450 thousand ECG records from MIMIC-IV-ECG, followed by external validation using more than 700 thousand records from ECG-View II. Their results demonstrated strong predictive performance and good generalizability of the model. For alcoholic liver disease, the AUC was 0.80 in internal validation and 0.76 in external validation. For liver failure, the AUCs were 0.74 and 0.75 in internal and external validation, respectively. Udompap et al[21] reported another AI-ECG model to predict metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease by incorporating other clinical data including age, sex, coexisting diseases, and laboratory test results. Notably, the model showed consistent discriminative ability, with an AUC of 0.72 in the original cohort and 0.72 in the external validation cohort. Furthermore, the AI-ECG model demonstrates potential for risk stratification in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD)[22]. It achieved an AUC of 0.86 in distinguishing healthy controls from CLD patients, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 12.33 [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.16-13.63], indicating a strong ability to correctly identify CLD. Beyond identifying liver diseases, ECGs hold significant prognostic value for patients with advanced liver dysfunction. The AI-Cirrhosis-ECG score, a deep learning-based system utilizing convolutional neural networks[23], was developed to distinguish patients with cirrhosis. Notably, every 0.1-point increase in the AI-Cirrhosis-ECG score was independently associated with a heightened risk of liver-related mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.32-1.58, P < 0.001]. This collective evidence suggests that ECG data may emerge as a non-invasive biomarker for liver diseases, potentially attributable to the underlying cardio-hepatic physiological interplay. The AI-ECG represents a promising bridge between cardiology and hepatology. By enabling ECG-based screening prior to formal diagnosis, it supports targeted clinical assessment as well as early detection.

CKD

Renal dysfunction is a major determinant of poor prognosis in cardiovascular disease, associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death[24,25]. Researchers have recently developed AI-ECG models capable of detection and prediction of renal impairment, offering an innovative tool for enhancing risk stratification. In patients with CKD, AI-ECG facilitates a comprehensive evaluation, including arrhythmia detection, assessment of cardiac structural remodeling, monitoring of blood pressure, and identification of electrolyte imbalances[26]. An AI-ECG model developed by Holmstrom et al[12] was designed to both identify and stage CKD. This study incorporated 247665 ECG data from 111370 participants to develop and validate the model, and then conducted external validation using nearly 896620 ECG data from another health system. The model achieved AUC values of 0.75 for mild CKD, 0.76 for moderate-to-severe CKD, and 0.78 for advanced CKD. Furthermore, in the subset of patients under 60 years of age, high discriminatory performance was observed regardless of ECG input type, with respective AUCs of 0.84 for 12-lead and 0.82 for single-lead ECG. For patients with end-stage renal disease, kidney transplantation serves as a key therapeutic option to preserve kidney function. AI-ECG models provide significant benefits, however, it also brings clinical challenges such as infection and immune rejection, which critically influence transplant outcomes[27]. Therefore, the accurate prediction of long-term survival following kidney transplantation is vital for sustaining a balanced organ allocation system, which promotes equitable distribution and maximizes organ use. In this context, AI-ECG models might present a potential assistive tool. Preoperative ECGs from 6504 patients undergoing kidney transplant at three centers operated by Mayo Clinic were analyzed by 6 AI algorithms to predict biological age and various cardiovascular parameters, including atrial fibrillation, aortic stenosis, low ejection fraction, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis. All algorithm outputs showed significant correlations with long-term all-cause mortality (P < 0.001)[28]. None of the patients had pre-existing cardiovascular disease at baseline. Consequently, AI-ECG demonstrates potential for predicting long-term cardiovascular risk and mortality in asymptomatic kidney transplant recipients, contributing to pinpoint those who would benefit from enhanced cardiac surveillance.

Pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE), a critical and often fatal manifestation of venous thromobosis, contributes significantly to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in both the short- and the long-term[29]. Utilizing ECG and clinical data from over 20-thousand PE patients, Somani et al[30] developed a machine-learning model for acute PE detection. From internal validation, it achieved an AUC of 0.81. Further evaluation within the test set showed that this integrated model significantly outperformed common clinical scoring methods (Wells’ Criteria, Revised Geneva Score, PE Rule-Out Criteria, and 4-Level PE Clinical Probability Score), with an AUC of 0.84 compared to the scoring methods’ range of 0.50-0.58. Another research group developed a random forest model using only presenting ECGs to stratify PE risk[31]. The AI-ECG model accurately predicted clinical severity (low-risk vs severe PE) with an AUC of 0.83, and the identified risk groups showed significantly different 30-day and in-hospital mortality outcomes. The AI-ECG model showed superior performance to standard clinical classification in accurately screening and stratifying PE patients, while also predicting short-term mortality. It might represent a valuable tool in clinical risk assessment.

AI-ECG-BASED PREDICTION OF ELECTROLYTE ABNORMALITIES

Blood biomarkers serve as indicators of pathophysiological and metabolic homeostasis. Clinically, parameters like electrolyte levels are assessed via blood sampling to monitor disease status. Compared to invasive blood collection, surface ECG is non-invasive, quicker to perform, and more economical. Consequently, the AI-ECG-based prediction of blood biomarker levels represents a growing focus of investigative interest. Abnormalities in serum potassium can affect cardiomyocytes, and underlying acute cardiovascular disease could magnify the association between potassium abnormalities and adverse outcomes[32]. Lin et al[11] reported that blood potassium levels estimated from 12 single-lead ECGs showed a mean error of less than 0.37 mmol/L compared to laboratory measurements. The model demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC > 0.85 for predicting moderate-to-severe hypokalemia (Lab-K+ ≤ 3 mmol/L) and > 0.95 for hyperkalemia (Lab-K+ ≥ 6 mmol/L). Moreover, it carried significant prognostic value: Patients with abnormal ECG-K+ had elevated all-cause mortality risk, regardless of whether laboratory results were normal (HR = 1.4, 95%CI: 1.16-1.69 for low ECG-K+; HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.00-2.24 for high ECG-K+). These findings indicate that AI-ECG captures subtle physiological features that may help predict adverse clinical outcomes. An analysis[33] of more than 11000 CICU patients admitted to the Mayo Clinic demonstrated that the AI-ECG algorithm for hyperkalemia detection could consistently identify individuals with increased in-hospital and post-discharge mortality risk, thereby highlighting its potential as a prognostic biomarker derived from the ECG. The proliferation of smart wearable devices also enabled convenient collection of physiological signals including heart rate, rhythm, and blood pressure. Notably, a recent study demonstrated that an AI algorithm leveraging single-lead ECG data from smart wristbands can effectively predict blood potassium levels[34]. The model achieved AUC of 0.88 in the training set and 0.83 in the external validation set, showing performance comparable to methods using clinical-grade ECGs.

Calcium ions play key roles in cellular homeostasis and are another key electrolyte of clinical concern[35]. The Lin et al[13] extended their finding by developing an AI-ECG model to predict blood calcium levels. This model achieved a mean absolute error of 0.78-0.98 mg/dL in estimating albumin-adjusted calcium. For detecting severe abnormalities, it showed high diagnostic accuracy, with AUCs of 0.92/0.84 for hypercalcemia and 0.89/0.77 for hypocalcemia in the internal and external validation sets, respectively.

As a non-specific inflammatory marker, C-reactive protein (CRP) has been identified as a biomarker for various arrhythmias, including their prognostication[36,37]. A research team from Guangzhou has developed an AI-ECG algorithm to detect CRP levels in patients with sinus rhythm[38]. After training and validation, the AUC of model achieved 0.86 and 0.85 on validation set and test set, respectively. This work not only reveals that cardiac electrophysiological signals contain inflammation-related information but also offer a non-invasive method to screen for inflammatory status using CRP.

APPLICATIONS OF AI-ECG IN OTHER FIELDS

Syncope is a common symptom with a broad differential diagnosis, spanning from benign etiologies to life-threatening conditions. Its prognosis is highly heterogeneous, while conventional clinical prediction tools often fail to accurately stratify associated risks. This creates a critical need for rapid risk assessment to guide clinical treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that AI-ECG models, by integrating routine clinical data with ECG signals, can provide additional value for the screening of underlying causes and prognostication of syncope[39-41]. Moreover, using data from a single-center retrospective cohort, an AI-ECG model was developed for pneumothorax detection[42]. It demonstrated excellent performance, with an AUC of 0.95 using standard 12-lead ECGs input and 0.93 even when limited to a single-lead ECG. This high accuracy suggests its potential as a tool for early ECG-based screening within the medical system, which could enhance diagnostic workflows. Driven by advances in AI and the era of healthcare big data, AI-ECG models are increasingly applied beyond traditional cardiovascular management to the diagnosis, risk stratification, and prognosis assessment of diverse diseases. Their utility now extends to multiple non-cardiovascular domains, including screening for conditions such as hyperthyroidism[43], epileptic seizures[44], and obstructive sleep apnea[45], as well as assessing post-procedural mortality[46].

GAPS IN KNOWLEDGE AND FUTURE RESEARCH

This opinion review summarized the extensive application of AI-ECG in the identification and risk stratification of non-CVD, suggesting that ECG signals may become a new type of biomarker characterized by high accuracy and accessibility. Its clinical value extends beyond the traditional domain of CVD. However, several limitations should be recognized. The development and validation of AI-ECG models require large volumes of data. For certain fields with low incidence but high mortality rates, such as cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity, further development is still needed. Second, ECG signals are influenced by various confounding factors, including patient age, gender, underlying comorbidities, medication history and individual differences during ECG acquisition. Due to the influence of a wide range of variables, the reliability of ECG signals for achieving specific and significant predictive purposes is often diminished. The application of AI-ECG in multi-system clinical management still requires verification through larger-scale, cross-ethnic studies. Moreover, like traditional AI algorithms, AI-ECG models suffer from a black-box nature, and their lack of interpretability may be one factor limiting their broader adoption. The development of explainable AI also represents a promising direction for future research. Finally, the efficacy of AI-ECG varies across different diseases, and the development and refinement of models will likely require ongoing research in the future.

CONCLUSION

AI-ECG models present a highly promising and accessible approach for screening and managing a range of non-CVD, offering particular utility in resource-limited settings. ECG-derived features, representing a novel class of biomarkers with substantial clinical relevance, can facilitate non-invasive diagnosis, enable early detection, and guide risk stratification prior to targeted clinical evaluation.

References
1.  Song W, Gao R, Liu T. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram for the Detection and Management of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiotoxicity. Cancer Innov. 2025;4:e70042.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Attia ZI, Harmon DM, Behr ER, Friedman PA. Application of artificial intelligence to the electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:4717-4730.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 96]  [Cited by in RCA: 200]  [Article Influence: 40.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Siontis KC, Noseworthy PA, Attia ZI, Friedman PA. Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography in cardiovascular disease management. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:465-478.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 114]  [Cited by in RCA: 498]  [Article Influence: 99.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
4.  Haug CJ, Drazen JM. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Clinical Medicine, 2023. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1201-1208.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 964]  [Cited by in RCA: 735]  [Article Influence: 245.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
5.  Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015;350:g7594.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3053]  [Cited by in RCA: 2882]  [Article Influence: 262.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
6.  Guo RX, Tian X, Bazoukis G, Tse G, Hong S, Chen KY, Liu T. Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024;47:789-801.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Sau A, Pastika L, Sieliwonczyk E, Patlatzoglou K, Ribeiro AH, McGurk KA, Zeidaabadi B, Zhang H, Macierzanka K, Mandic D, Sabino E, Giatti L, Barreto SM, Camelo LDV, Tzoulaki I, O'Regan DP, Peters NS, Ware JS, Ribeiro ALP, Kramer DB, Waks JW, Ng FS. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram for mortality and cardiovascular risk estimation: a model development and validation study. Lancet Digit Health. 2024;6:e791-e802.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in RCA: 50]  [Article Influence: 25.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Song WH, Tse G, Chen KY, Liu T. Artificial intelligence-enabled single-lead electrocardiogram in early detection of ischemic heart disease. World J Cardiol. 2025;17:108510.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Li X, Zhang D, Li X, Gao X, Liang Y, Tse G, Zhang Q, Tao H, Chen K, Xu W, Li G, Liu W, Yan GX, Hong S, Liu T. Exploring artificial intelligence methods for cardiac syncope diagnosis combined with electrocardiogram parameters and clinical characteristics. J Electrocardiol. 2025;91:154018.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, Riley RD, Beam AL, Van Calster B, Ghassemi M, Liu X, Reitsma JB, van Smeden M, Boulesteix AL, Camaradou JC, Celi LA, Denaxas S, Denniston AK, Glocker B, Golub RM, Harvey H, Heinze G, Hoffman MM, Kengne AP, Lam E, Lee N, Loder EW, Maier-Hein L, Mateen BA, McCradden MD, Oakden-Rayner L, Ordish J, Parnell R, Rose S, Singh K, Wynants L, Logullo P. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ. 2024;385:e078378.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1587]  [Cited by in RCA: 1714]  [Article Influence: 857.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (10)]
11.  Lin C, Chau T, Lin CS, Shang HS, Fang WH, Lee DJ, Lee CC, Tsai SH, Wang CH, Lin SH. Point-of-care artificial intelligence-enabled ECG for dyskalemia: a retrospective cohort analysis for accuracy and outcome prediction. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5:8.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 41]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Holmstrom L, Christensen M, Yuan N, Weston Hughes J, Theurer J, Jujjavarapu M, Fatehi P, Kwan A, Sandhu RK, Ebinger J, Cheng S, Zou J, Chugh SS, Ouyang D. Deep learning-based electrocardiographic screening for chronic kidney disease. Commun Med (Lond). 2023;3:73.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Lin C, Chen CC, Chau T, Lin CS, Tsai SH, Lee DJ, Lee CC, Shang HS, Lin SH. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography identifies severe dyscalcemias and has prognostic value. Clin Chim Acta. 2022;536:126-134.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Lin C, Kuo FC, Chau T, Shih JH, Lin CS, Chen CC, Lee CC, Lin SH. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography contributes to hyperthyroidism detection and outcome prediction. Commun Med (Lond). 2024;4:42.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Karbovskaya AD, Marzoog BA, Stroeva A, Suvorov A, Chomakhidze P, Gognieva D, Kuznetsova N, Syrkin A, Fadeev VV, Ismailova SM, Poluboyarinova IV, Kopylov P. Machine learning-based detection of diabetes mellitus from single-lead electrocardiography: A phenotype-stratified approach. World J Cardiol. 2026;18:116217.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Duncan BB, Magliano DJ, Boyko EJ. IDF Diabetes Atlas 11th edition 2025: global prevalence and projections for 2050. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2025;41:7-9.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 131]  [Cited by in RCA: 180]  [Article Influence: 180.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
17.  Rajendra Acharya U, Vidya KS, Ghista DN, Lim WJE, Molinari F, Sankaranarayanan M. Computer-aided diagnosis of diabetic subjects by heart rate variability signals using discrete wavelet transform method. Knowledge-based Syst. 2015;81:56-64.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 77]  [Cited by in RCA: 48]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Cichosz SL, Frystyk J, Hejlesen OK, Tarnow L, Fleischer J. A novel algorithm for prediction and detection of hypoglycemia based on continuous glucose monitoring and heart rate variability in patients with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8:731-737.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in RCA: 50]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Strodthoff N, Lopez Alcaraz JM, Haverkamp W. Prospects for artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram as a unified screening tool for cardiac and non-cardiac conditions: an explorative study in emergency care. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024;5:454-460.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Lopez Alcaraz JM, Haverkamp W, Strodthoff N. Electrocardiogram-based diagnosis of liver diseases: an externally validated and explainable machine learning approach. EClinicalMedicine. 2025;84:103242.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Udompap P, Liu K, Attia IZ, Canning RE, Benson JT, Therneau TM, Noseworthy PA, Friedman PA, Rattan P, Ahn JC, Simonetto DA, Shah VH, Kamath PS, Allen AM. Performance of AI-Enabled Electrocardiogram in the Prediction of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;23:574-582.e3.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Rattan P, Ahn JC, Chara BS, Mullan AF, Liu K, Attia ZI, Friedman PA, Allen A, Shah VH, Kamath PS, Noseworthy PA, Simonetto DA. Training and Performance of an Electrocardiogram-Enabled Machine Learning Model for Detection of Advanced Chronic Liver Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2025;120:2452-2456.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Ahn JC, Rattan P, Starlinger P, Juanola A, Moreta MJ, Colmenero J, Aqel B, Keaveny AP, Mullan AF, Liu K, Attia ZI, Allen AM, Friedman PA, Shah VH, Noseworthy PA, Heimbach JK, Kamath PS, Gines P, Simonetto DA. AI-Cirrhosis-ECG (ACE) score for predicting decompensation and liver outcomes. JHEP Rep. 2025;7:101356.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395:709-733.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5115]  [Cited by in RCA: 4690]  [Article Influence: 781.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (8)]
25.  Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium; Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, Woodward M, Levey AS, de Jong PE, Coresh J, Gansevoort RT. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:2073-2081.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3484]  [Cited by in RCA: 3189]  [Article Influence: 199.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
26.  Zheng Z, Soomro QH, Charytan DM. Deep Learning Using Electrocardiograms in Patients on Maintenance Dialysis. Adv Kidney Dis Health. 2023;30:61-68.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Chaudhry D, Chaudhry A, Peracha J, Sharif A. Survival for waitlisted kidney failure patients receiving transplantation versus remaining on waiting list: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022;376:e068769.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 114]  [Cited by in RCA: 114]  [Article Influence: 28.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Pencovich N, Smith BH, Attia ZI, Jimenez FL, Bentall AJ, Schinstock CA, Khamash HA, Jadlowiec CC, Jarmi T, Mao SA, Park WD, Diwan TS, Friedman PA, Stegall MD. Electrocardiography-based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Aid in Prediction of Long-term Mortality After Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation. 2024;108:1976-1985.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Essien EO, Rali P, Mathai SC. Pulmonary Embolism. Med Clin North Am. 2019;103:549-564.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 64]  [Cited by in RCA: 125]  [Article Influence: 17.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
30.  Somani SS, Honarvar H, Narula S, Landi I, Lee S, Khachatoorian Y, Rehmani A, Kim A, De Freitas JK, Teng S, Jaladanki S, Kumar A, Russak A, Zhao SP, Freeman R, Levin MA, Nadkarni GN, Kagen AC, Argulian E, Glicksberg BS. Development of a machine learning model using electrocardiogram signals to improve acute pulmonary embolism screening. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:56-66.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Gokhale TA, Riek NT, Medoff B, Ji RQ, Rivera-Lebron B, Sejdic E, Akcakaya M, Saba SF, Al-Zaiti S, Toma C. Artificial intelligence-driven electrocardiogram analysis for risk stratification in pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025;6:989-996.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Brueske B, Sidhu MS, Schulman-Marcus J, Kashani KB, Barsness GW, Jentzer JC. Hyperkalemia Is Associated With Increased Mortality Among Unselected Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e011814.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Harmon DM, Heinrich CK, Dillon JJ, Carter RE, Kashani KB, Attia ZI, Friedman PA, Jentzer JC. Mortality Risk Stratification Utilizing Artificial Intelligence Electrocardiogram for Hyperkalemia in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients. JACC Adv. 2024;3:101169.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Chiu IM, Wu PJ, Zhang H, Hughes JW, Rogers AJ, Jalilian L, Perez M, Lin CR, Lee CT, Zou J, Ouyang D. Serum Potassium Monitoring Using AI-Enabled Smartwatch Electrocardiograms. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024;10:2644-2654.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Catalano A, Chilà D, Bellone F, Nicocia G, Martino G, Loddo I, Morabito N, Benvenga S, Loddo S. Incidence of hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia in hospitalized patients: Is it changing? J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2018;13:9-13.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Tibaut M, Caprnda M, Kubatka P, Sinkovič A, Valentova V, Filipova S, Gazdikova K, Gaspar L, Mozos I, Egom EE, Rodrigo L, Kruzliak P, Petrovic D. Markers of Atherosclerosis: Part 1 - Serological Markers. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28:667-677.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in RCA: 52]  [Article Influence: 6.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Kurt B, Reugels M, Schneider KM, Spiesshoefer J, Milzi A, Gombert A, Fordyce CB, Wenzl FA, Pagidipati NJ, Rocha V, Fudim M, Sharma A, Lehrke M, Shimokawa H, Liuzzo G, Tokgozoglu L, Crea F, Lüscher TF, Libby P, Ridker PM, Marx N, Schneider CV, Kahles F. C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk in the general population. Eur Heart J. 2025;47:1799-1810.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 18.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
38.  Jiang J, Deng H, Liao H, Fang X, Zhan X, Wu S, Xue Y. Development and Validation of a Deep-Learning Model to Detect CRP Level from the Electrocardiogram. Front Physiol. 2022;13:864747.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Costantino G, Falavigna G, Solbiati M, Casagranda I, Sun BC, Grossman SA, Quinn JV, Reed MJ, Ungar A, Montano N, Furlan R, Ippoliti R. Neural networks as a tool to predict syncope risk in the Emergency Department. Europace. 2017;19:1891-1895.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Li XM, Zhang DY, Gao XY, Li XL, Liang Y, Liu WL, Hong SD, Liu T. [An artificial intelligence model based on clinical characteristics and electrocardiogram parameters for diagnosis of reflex syncope]. Zhonghua Xinlv Shichangxue Zazhi. 2022;26:418-423.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
41.  Li XM, Gao XY, Tse G, Hong SD, Chen KY, Li GP, Liu T. Electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022;19:970-980.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Lee CC, Lin CS, Tsai CS, Tsao TP, Cheng CC, Liou JT, Lin WS, Lee CC, Chen JT, Lin C. A deep learning-based system capable of detecting pneumothorax via electrocardiogram. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48:3317-3326.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Choi B, Jang JH, Son M, Lee MS, Jo YY, Jeon JY, Jin U, Soh M, Park RW, Kwon JM. Electrocardiographic biomarker based on machine learning for detecting overt hyperthyroidism. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:255-264.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Jeppesen J, Christensen J, Johansen P, Beniczky S. Personalized seizure detection using logistic regression machine learning based on wearable ECG-monitoring device. Seizure. 2023;107:155-161.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Covassin N, Liu K, Bukartyk J, Timm PC, Friedman PA, St Louis EK, Attia ZI, Somers VK. Deep Neural Network Algorithm Using the Electrocardiogram for Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. JACC Adv. 2025;4:102139.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Ouyang D, Theurer J, Stein NR, Hughes JW, Elias P, He B, Yuan N, Duffy G, Sandhu RK, Ebinger J, Botting P, Jujjavarapu M, Claggett B, Tooley JE, Poterucha T, Chen JH, Nurok M, Perez M, Perotte A, Zou JY, Cook NR, Chugh SS, Cheng S, Albert CM. Electrocardiographic deep learning for predicting post-procedural mortality: a model development and validation study. Lancet Digit Health. 2024;6:e70-e78.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 14.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Footnotes

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Cardiac and cardiovascular systems

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

Novelty: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

Creativity or innovation: Grade A, Grade A, Grade C

Scientific significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Gunes Y, Full Professor, Professor, Türkiye; Liu J, Assistant Professor, China S-Editor: Wu S L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zheng XM

Write to the Help Desk