Published online May 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i5.107434
Revised: April 6, 2025
Accepted: April 18, 2025
Published online: May 26, 2025
Processing time: 61 Days and 5.3 Hours
In patients with advanced cancer, the prevalence rate of cardiac autonomic neu
Core Tip: Heart rate variability (HRV) serves as an indicator of autonomic nervous system function. A reduction in HRV is associated with system imbalances and potential health concerns in patients with cancer. A study involving 127 cancer patients revealed that both the disease and its treatments can lead to a decrease in HRV. Additionally, psychological factors such as stress and anxiety also influence HRV levels. Therefore, monitoring HRV can aid in the assessment of cancer patients’ health status, prognosis, and the formulation of personalized treatment plans.
- Citation: Kikuchi T, Kasai T. Relationship between heart rate variability and cancer management. World J Cardiol 2025; 17(5): 107434
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v17/i5/107434.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i5.107434
The prevalence rate of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) in patients with advanced cancer is 70%-80%. The 1-year survival rate of patients with CAN is half that of patients without CAN, and CAN is considered an indicator of poor prognosis[1-3]. However, a few studies have reported that the presence of CAN is associated with a poor prognosis even in cancer survivors who are expected to survive for a long time[4-6]. Thus, the association between cancer and CAN is complicated by several confounding factors, such as chemotherapy[7], the patient's general health status, and their ability to perform activities of daily living[8]. Mechanisms such as inflammation, infection, metabolism, neurodegeneration, toxic processes, and cancer treatment have been proposed as etiologies of CAN in cancer patients[9]. However, these mechanisms have not been completely elucidated, and their relationship has only been described indirectly. In recent years, studies using human breast cancer tissues and mouse and rat breast cancer models have demonstrated that autonomic nervous system function is related to cancer growth and metastasis, providing insights into the direct relationship between the two.
The paper by Deng and Song[10] is an observational study that used heart rate variability (HRV) as an established non-invasive screening method[11] for CAN to investigate the HRV of 127 consecutive cancer patients (age: 62.8 ± 12.4 years; 73 men and 54 women; tumor locations: Head and neck 37; chest 62; digestive system 16; and other: 12; tumor stage: I: 15; II: 27; III: 52; and IV: 33), who were recruited comprehensively from a group of cancer patients with all severity levels. The primary endpoint was to compare the time domain (five indices, including standard deviation of all normal-to-normal intervals) and frequency domain (three indices, including low frequency, HRV indices derived from 24-hour ambulatory, and Holter monitoring with typical reference values)[11,12].
Their findings showed that all HRV indices in patients with cancer were significantly lower than the normal reference values. The decrease in HRV in patients with cancer did not show any significant relationship with general patient background, such as sex and age, or location of the tumor. However, a significant decrease was observed in all HRV indices as the degree of tumor stage increased. Unfortunately, only a limited number of HRV indices are reported in the present study, particularly in the frequency domain.
Managing CAN is essential for improving the survival and quality of life of patients with cancer[13]. Their study shows that patients and specialists can work together to customize cancer treatment and management using HRV as an index. However, the results of this study provide insights derived from univariate analyses and do not address potential confounding factors other than the items examined[7,8].
Nevertheless, their study results may inspire future randomized prospective studies to determine the clinical utility of HRV as an index for monitoring the management of patients with cancer.
1. | Stone CA, Kenny RA, Nolan B, Lawlor PG. Autonomic dysfunction in patients with advanced cancer; prevalence, clinical correlates and challenges in assessment. BMC Palliat Care. 2012;11:3. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in RCA: 25] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Ewing DJ, Borsey DQ, Bellavere F, Clarke BF. Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetes: comparison of measures of R-R interval variation. Diabetologia. 1981;21:18-24. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 166] [Cited by in RCA: 166] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Teng AE, Noor B, Ajijola OA, Yang EH. Chemotherapy and Radiation-Associated Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021;23:14. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in RCA: 23] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Caro-Morán E, Fernández-Lao C, Galiano-Castillo N, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Arroyo-Morales M, Díaz-Rodríguez L. Heart Rate Variability in Breast Cancer Survivors After the First Year of Treatments: A Case-Controlled Study. Biol Res Nurs. 2016;18:43-49. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 35] [Cited by in RCA: 36] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Guo Y, Koshy S, Hui D, Palmer JL, Shin K, Bozkurt M, Yusuf SW. Prognostic Value of Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Cancer. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;32:516-520. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 41] [Cited by in RCA: 43] [Article Influence: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Kloter E, Barrueto K, Klein SD, Scholkmann F, Wolf U. Heart Rate Variability as a Prognostic Factor for Cancer Survival - A Systematic Review. Front Physiol. 2018;9:623. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 50] [Cited by in RCA: 76] [Article Influence: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Ekholm EM, Salminen EK, Huikuri HV, Jalonen J, Antila KJ, Salmi TA, Rantanen VT. Impairment of heart rate variability during paclitaxel therapy. Cancer. 2000;88:2149-2153. [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] |
8. | Kim K, Chae J, Lee S. The Role of Heart Rate Variability in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients. J Palliat Care. 2015;31:103-108. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in RCA: 17] [Article Influence: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Coumbe BGT, Groarke JD. Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction in Patients with Cancer. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018;20:69. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in RCA: 21] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Deng YZ, Song B. Connection between heart rate variability alterations and cancer in tumor patients. World J Cardiol. 2025;17:102999. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | . Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:354-381. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 4780] [Cited by in RCA: 4807] [Article Influence: 165.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Berntson GG, Bigger JT Jr, Eckberg DL, Grossman P, Kaufmann PG, Malik M, Nagaraja HN, Porges SW, Saul JP, Stone PH, van der Molen MW. Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology. 1997;34:623-648. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 2413] [Cited by in RCA: 2371] [Article Influence: 84.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Yoon SY, Oh J. Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Before and After Chemotherapy in Cancer Patients. J Clin Neurol. 2024;20:551-562. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |