Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2014; 6(6): 434-443
Published online Jun 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.434
Published online Jun 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.434
Figure 1 Overview of interventional strategies for achieving cardioprotection as adjunct to thrombolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention, see text for details.
Figure 2 Effect of remote ischemic conditioning on long-term clinical outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Cumulative incidence (%). A: Of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) by year since randomization (per-protocol analysis). P = 0.010; B: Of all-cause mortality by year since randomization (per-protocol analysis). P = 0.019; C: Of cardiac mortality (%) by year since randomization (per-protocol analysis). P = 0.248; D: Of non-cardiac mortality (%) by year since randomization (per-protocol analysis). P = 0.045. Modified from Sloth et al[89]. Eur Heart J (2014) 35: 168-175. pPCI: Primary percutaneous interven- tion; RIC: Remote ischemic conditioning.
- Citation: Schmidt MR, Pryds K, Bøtker HE. Novel adjunctive treatments of myocardial infarction. World J Cardiol 2014; 6(6): 434-443
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v6/i6/434.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.434