BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2026; 18(7): 121611
Published online Jul 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.121611
Figure 1
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram representing breakdown of screened and included studies. PICO: Population, intervention, comparator, and outcome.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Risk of bias assessment of included randomized controlled trials.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Primary efficacy outcomes. A-C: Dose comparison of olezarsen 80 mg vs 50 mg in regard to reduction in triglyceride level (A), non-high-density lipoproteins cholesterol level (B), and apolipoprotein C-III level (C).
Figure 4
Figure 4 Secondary lipid outcomes. A-D: Dose comparison of olezarsen 80 mg vs 50 mg in regard to reduction in low density lipoproteins level (A), very low-density lipoproteins level (B), high-density lipoproteins level (C) and apolipoprotein B level (D).
Figure 5
Figure 5 Overall safety outcomes. A and B: Dose comparison of olezarsen 80 mg vs 50 mg in regard to any adverse events (A) and serious adverse events (B).
Figure 6
Figure 6 Specific safety outcomes. A-D: Dose comparison of olezarsen 80 mg vs 50 mg in regard to hypersenstivity reaction (A), hepatic dysfunction (B), renal dysfunction (C) and thrombocytopenia (D).


Write to the Help Desk