Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2024; 16(1): 40-48
Published online Jan 26, 2024. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40
Figure 1
Figure 1 PRISMA flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Forest plot comparing paced QRS duration between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Forest plot comparing pacing threshold at follow-up between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Forest plot comparing paced left ventricular ejection fraction between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Forest plot comparing paced left ventricular end-diastolic diameter between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Forest plot comparing paced left ventricular end-systolic diameter between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Forest plot comparing New York Heart Association classification between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Forest plot comparing B-type natriuretic peptide levels between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.