Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2015; 7(10): 273-278
Published online Oct 27, 2015. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i10.273
Table 1 Classification of internal hemorrhoids
GradePhysical findings
IProminent hemorrhoidal vessels, no prolapse
IIProlapse with Valsalva maneuver; spontaneous reduction
IIIProlapse with Valsalva maneuver; requires manual reduction
IVChronically prolapsed; manual reduction ineffective
Table 2 Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients that underwent the anal cushion method (n = 127)
Characteristics and outcomesValues (95%CI)
Age (yr)42 (19-84)
Gender (male:female)32 (25.2%): 95 (74.8%)
Grade (2:3:4)1 (0.8%): 113 (89.0%): 13 (10.2%)
Follow-up time (mo)26 (0-88)
Operative time (min)15 (4-30)
Duration of analgesic treatment (d)3 (2-13)
No. of intravenous analgesic injections0 (0-9)
No. of doses of extra-oral analgesic medication administered3 (0-21)
Duration of hospital stay (d) (Time to resumption of normal activity)7 (2-13)
Total complications10/127 (7.9%)
Bleeding1 (0.8%)
Urinary retention6 (4.7%)
Recurrence3 (2.4%)
Anal stenosis0
Infection0
Persistent anal pain during hospital stay0
Table 3 Perioperative and postoperative findings of conventional hemorrhoidectomy methods
Ref.Bikhchandani et al[15]Shalaby et al[10]Bulus et al[16]Correa-Rovelo et al[9]
MethodMMMMFergusonFerguson
No. of patients421007142
Operative time (min) (mean ± SD)45.2 ± 5.419.7 ± 4.725.5 ± 7.738.1 ± 12.9
Complications (%)
Bleeding2.42.04.20
External tags2.41.0-4.9
Anal stenosis05.01.42.4
Infection0-1.4-
Urinary retention16.714.028.27.1
Recurrence5.02.08.50