Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2013; 5(6): 161-166
Published online Jun 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i6.161
Published online Jun 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i6.161
Table 1 Management strategies of minimally invasive treatment of cholecysto-choledocal lithiasis
| One step surgical treatment | Laparoscopic |
| Endoscopic + surgical approach | Preoperative ERCP |
| Intraoperative ERCP | |
| Postoperative ERCP | |
| Endoscopic treatment alone1 | Endoscopic stones extraction without subsequent cholecystectomy |
Table 2 Discussion overview of management strategies
| Type of procedure | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| ERCP + ES | Less invasive | Equipment |
| Procedure of choice in post-cholecystectomy | Local expertise | |
| patients, acute cholangitis, gallstone pancreatitis | 2 stage procedure | |
| Complications | ||
| LCBDE: transcystic | Minimal invasive | Equipment |
| One stage procedure | Local expertise | |
| Anatomic variations | ||
| Prolonged OR time | ||
| LCBDE: choledochotomy | One stage procedure | Most invasive |
| Necessitate of T-tube | ||
| Prolonged OR time |
- Citation: Palma GDD. Minimally invasive treatment of cholecysto-choledocal lithiasis: The point of view of the surgical endoscopist. World J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 5(6): 161-166
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v5/i6/161.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v5.i6.161
