Copyright
        ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
    
    
        World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2012; 4(10): 223-227
Published online Oct 27, 2012. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i10.223
Published online Oct 27, 2012. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i10.223
            Table 1 Main results of reported series comparing embolization with surgery for upper gastrointestinal bleeding after failed endoscopic hemostasis (%)
        
    | Study | Clinical success | Complication | Mortality | ||||||
| TAE | Surgery | P value | TAE | Surgery | P value | TAE | Surgery | P value | |
| Ripoll et al[12] | 71 | 76.9 | NS | 0 | 17.9 | NS | 25.8 | 20.5 | NS | 
| Eriksson et al[13] | 75 | 82 | NS | 20 | 37 | NS | 3 | 14 | NS | 
| Venclauskas et al[14] | 20.8 | 22 | NS | 54.2 | 66.7 | NS | 20.8 | 22 | NS | 
| Wong et al[15] | 65.6 | 87.5 | < 0.05 | 40.6 | 67.9 | < 0.05 | 25 | 30.4 | NS | 
| Ang et al[1] | 53.3 | 87.3 | < 0.05 | 46.7 | 60.3 | NS | 16.7 | 19 | NS | 
- Citation: Loffroy R, Estivalet L, Cherblanc V, Sottier D, Guiu B, Cercueil JP, Krausé D. Transcatheter embolization as the new reference standard for endoscopically unmanageable upper gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 4(10): 223-227
 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v4/i10/223.htm
 - DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v4.i10.223
 
