Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 119341
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.119341
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.119341
Table 1 Baseline characteristics comparison, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Characteristic | Conventional group (n = 40) | ERAS group (n = 40) | Test statistic | P value |
| Age (years) | 64.7 ± 11.8 | 63.2 ± 12.1 | t = 0.586 | 0.561 |
| Gender | χ2 = 0.050 | 0.823 | ||
| Male | 23 (57.5) | 24 (60.0) | ||
| Female | 17 (42.5) | 16 (40.0) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.3 ± 3.1 | 23.5 ± 2.8 | t = -0.329 | 0.743 |
| Preoperative serum albumin (g/L) | 38.7 ± 4.1 | 39.3 ± 3.6 | t = -0.732 | 0.468 |
| Tumor location | χ2 = 0.197 | 0.657 | ||
| Colon | 24 (60.0) | 23 (57.5) | ||
| Rectum | 16 (40.0) | 17 (42.5) | ||
| TNM stage | χ2 = 0.461 | 0.794 | ||
| Stage I | 8 (20.0) | 9 (22.5) | ||
| Stage II | 18 (45.0) | 17 (42.5) | ||
| Stage III | 14 (35.0) | 14 (35.0) | ||
| Tumor differentiation | χ2 = 0.324 | 0.851 | ||
| Well differentiated | 12 (30.0) | 14 (35.0) | ||
| Moderately differentiated | 22 (55.0) | 21 (52.5) | ||
| Poorly differentiated | 6 (15.0) | 5 (12.5) | ||
| Surgical approach | χ2 = 0.145 | 0.703 | ||
| Laparoscopic | 28 (70.0) | 29 (72.5) | ||
| Open surgery | 12 (30.0) | 11 (27.5) | ||
| Anesthesia time (minutes) | 147.2 ± 29.3 | 143.8 ± 30.7 | t = 0.543 | 0.589 |
| ASA score | χ2 = 0.074 | 0.786 | ||
| I-II | 32 (80.0) | 33 (82.5) | ||
| III | 8 (20.0) | 7 (17.5) |
Table 2 Enhanced recovery after surgery group nutritional risk assessment results, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Clinical parameter | No risk (n = 13) | Moderate risk (n = 16) | High risk (n = 11) | P value |
| Age (years) | 58.4 ± 10.2 | 64.8 ± 11.5 | 68.3 ± 12.7 | 0.037 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.8 ± 2.3 | 23.2 ± 2.8 | 21.9 ± 3.4 | 0.021 |
| Preoperative weight loss | < 0.001 | |||
| None | 13 (100.0) | 7 (43.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 5%-10% | 0 (0.0) | 8 (50.0) | 2 (18.2) | |
| > 10% | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.2) | 9 (81.8) | |
| Appetite status | < 0.001 | |||
| Normal | 13 (100.0) | 4 (25.0) | 1 (9.1) | |
| Decreased | 0 (0.0) | 12 (75.0) | 10 (90.9) | |
| Serum albumin (g/L) | 41.2 ± 2.8 | 38.9 ± 3.1 | 33.8 ± 4.2 | < 0.001 |
| Hypoalbuminemia (< 35 g/L) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (12.5) | 7 (63.6) | < 0.001 |
| Prealbumin (mg/L) | 278.6 ± 35.4 | 215.3 ± 42.1 | 165.8 ± 38.7 | < 0.001 |
| Hypoprealbuminemia (< 200 mg/L) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (31.3) | 9 (81.8) | < 0.001 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 128.4 ± 11.2 | 118.7 ± 13.5 | 106.9 ± 15.8 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Changes in serum nutritional indicators, mean ± SD
| Indicator | Time Point | Conventional group (n = 40) | ERAS group (n = 40) | Test statistic | P value |
| Serum albumin (g/L) | |||||
| Preoperative | 38.7 ± 4.1 | 39.3 ± 3.6 | t = -0.732 | 0.468 | |
| 7 days postop | 33.2 ± 4.2 | 36.8 ± 3.1 | t = -4.326 | < 0.01 | |
| 14 days postop | 35.1 ± 3.9 | 39.5 ± 2.8 | t = -5.612 | < 0.01 | |
| Prealbumin (mg/L) | |||||
| Preoperative | 235.4 ± 48.3 | 241.7 ± 44.2 | t = -0.612 | 0.543 | |
| 7 days postop | 198.7 ± 52.1 | 265.3 ± 45.2 | t = -6.041 | < 0.001 | |
| 14 days postop | 235.6 ± 47.3 | 321.8 ± 38.4 | t = -8.754 | < 0.001 | |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | |||||
| Preoperative | 122.8 ± 14.6 | 125.3 ± 12.9 | t = -0.812 | 0.419 | |
| 7 days postop | 106.4 ± 16.2 | 112.7 ± 13.8 | t = -1.878 | 0.064 | |
| 14 days postop | 108.2 ± 15.7 | 118.5 ± 12.3 | t = -3.247 | < 0.01 | |
| Total protein (g/L) | |||||
| Preoperative | 68.5 ± 6.2 | 69.8 ± 5.7 | t = -0.987 | 0.327 | |
| 7 days postop | 62.3 ± 7.1 | 66.9 ± 5.9 | t = -3.154 | < 0.01 | |
| 14 days postop | 64.7 ± 6.8 | 70.2 ± 5.4 | t = -4.038 | < 0.001 | |
| Transferrin (mg/L) | |||||
| Preoperative | 2.48 ± 0.42 | 2.52 ± 0.38 | t = -0.452 | 0.653 | |
| 7 days postop | 2.12 ± 0.48 | 2.67 ± 0.41 | t = -5.462 | < 0.001 | |
| 14 days postop | 2.28 ± 0.45 | 2.89 ± 0.37 | t = -6.523 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Inflammatory response indicator comparison, mean ± SD
| Indicator | Time point | Conventional group (n = 40) | ERAS group (n = 40) | Test statistic | P value |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | |||||
| Preoperative | 4.2 ± 2.1 | 3.8 ± 1.9 | t = 0.894 | 0.374 | |
| Postop day 3 | 23.7 ± 9.1 | 15.2 ± 6.8 | t = 4.652 | < 0.001 | |
| Postop day 7 | 14.8 ± 6.5 | 8.6 ± 4.2 | t = 4.891 | < 0.001 | |
| Interleukin-6 (pg/mL) | |||||
| Preoperative | 3.2 ± 1.8 | 2.9 ± 1.6 | t = 0.796 | 0.428 | |
| Postop day 3 | 28.9 ± 11.2 | 18.4 ± 7.3 | t = 4.721 | < 0.001 | |
| Postop day 7 | 19.7 ± 8.4 | 12.1 ± 5.8 | t = 4.587 | < 0.001 | |
| White blood cell count (× 109/L) | |||||
| Preoperative | 6.8 ± 2.3 | 6.5 ± 2.1 | t = 0.618 | 0.538 | |
| Postop day 3 | 12.4 ± 3.7 | 9.8 ± 2.9 | t = 3.423 | < 0.01 | |
| Postop day 7 | 9.6 ± 3.2 | 7.4 ± 2.5 | t = 3.341 | < 0.01 | |
| Neutrophil percentage (%) | |||||
| Preoperative | 62.8 ± 8.4 | 61.5 ± 7.9 | t = 0.721 | 0.473 | |
| Postop day 3 | 78.9 ± 9.6 | 72.3 ± 8.2 | t = 3.267 | < 0.01 | |
| Postop day 7 | 71.4 ± 8.8 | 66.2 ± 7.6 | t = 2.816 | < 0.01 | |
| Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/hour) | |||||
| Preoperative | 18.4 ± 12.6 | 16.8 ± 11.3 | t = 0.594 | 0.554 | |
| Postop day 7 | 42.8 ± 18.2 | 31.5 ± 14.7 | t = 2.978 | < 0.01 | |
| Postop day 14 | 35.6 ± 15.9 | 24.8 ± 12.4 | t = 3.321 | < 0.01 |
Table 5 Gastrointestinal function recovery, mean ± SD
| Recovery parameter | Conventional group (n = 40) | ERAS group (n = 40) | Test statistic | P value |
| First flatus time (days) | 3.2 ± 1.1 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | t = 4.987 | < 0.001 |
| First defecation time (days) | 4.6 ± 1.5 | 3.2 ± 1.2 | t = 4.564 | < 0.001 |
| Bowel sound recovery time (days) | 4.1 ± 1.3 | 2.8 ± 1.0 | t = 4.873 | < 0.001 |
| Time to tolerate clear liquids (days) | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 0.9 ± 0.5 | t = 5.287 | < 0.001 |
| Time to tolerate semi-solid diet (days) | 3.4 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 0.8 | t = 4.721 | < 0.001 |
| Time to resume normal diet (days) | 6.2 ± 1.8 | 4.1 ± 1.3 | t = 5.826 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhang XL, Hong QQ, Lin LZ. Clinical effects of nutritional risk screening 2002-guided individualized nutritional intervention in postoperative colorectal cancer patients: A time-period comparison study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(8): 119341
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i8/119341.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.119341