Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 118525
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.118525
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.118525
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Characteristic | Observation group (n = 52) | Control group (n = 48) |
| Age (years) | 58.3 ± 10.5 | 59.7 ± 11.2 |
| Male sex | 33 (63.5) | 29 (60.4) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 3.2 | 24.1 ± 3.5 |
| Tumor distance from anal verge (cm) | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 3.6 ± 1.3 |
| TNM stage | ||
| I | 12 (23.1) | 10 (20.8) |
| II | 21 (40.4) | 19 (39.6) |
| III | 19 (36.5) | 19 (39.6) |
| Neoadjuvant therapy | 35 (67.3) | 31 (64.6) |
| Time to stoma closure (months) | 4.2 ± 1.1 | 4.5 ± 1.3 |
Table 2 Anorectal manometry parameters over time, mean ± SD
Table 3 Functional outcomes and quality of life measures at 6 months, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Outcome measure | Observation (n = 52) | Control (n = 48) |
| Wexner incontinence score | 4.2 ± 1.8c | 8.5 ± 2.3 |
| Good continence (score ≤ 7) | 38 (73.1)b | 20 (41.7) |
| Time to normal defecation (days) | 68.5 ± 12.3c | 95.8 ± 18.5 |
| Daily bowel frequency (times/day) | 3.8 ± 1.2c | 6.5 ± 2.1 |
| Urgency | 10 (19.2)c | 25 (52.1) |
| FIQL total score (range 1-5) | 4.1 ± 0.6c | 3.2 ± 0.8 |
| Patient satisfaction score (0-10) | 8.3 ± 1.1c | 6.1 ± 1.6 |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of predictors for good continence at 6 months
| Variable | Adjusted OR | 95%CI | P value |
| Pelvic floor rehabilitation | 8.73 | 3.15-24.18 | < 0.001 |
| Baseline MSP (per mmHg) | 1.05 | 1.02-1.08 | 0.002 |
| Tumor distance from anal verge (per cm) | 1.42 | 1.08-1.87 | 0.012 |
| Age (per year) | 0.97 | 0.93-1.01 | 0.156 |
| Male sex | 1.23 | 0.48-3.15 | 0.665 |
| Neoadjuvant therapy | 0.78 | 0.29-2.08 | 0.619 |
- Citation: Liu XJ, Wei ML, Liu LL, Qin JJ. Pelvic floor rehabilitation improves anorectal function after sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(8): 118525
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i8/118525.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.118525