BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 117878
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.117878
Table 1 Domain-specific multivariable analysis of medical provider-related factors

Success/failure
P value
Exp(B)
95%CI for Exp(B)
Operator experience0.007
> 20 cases112/651.921.193.10
≤ 20 cases136/420.520.320.84
Operator title0.001
Senior83/274.221.7710.06
Junior165/800.240.100.57
Guide experience0.818
> 20 cases86/381.060.641.75
≤ 20 cases162/690.940.571.55
Guide title0.327
Senior89/321.290.782.14
Junior159/750.780.471.29
Specialty0.250
Surgery125/490.680.351.32
Internal medicine85/382.360.935.97
Emergency medicine38/201.480.762.89
Level of cooperation0.039
Good235/952.531.056.09
Poor13/120.400.160.95
Table 2 Domain-specific multivariable analysis of patient-related factors

Success/failure
P value
Exp(B)
95%CI for Exp(B)
Age0.848
> 65 years151/670.930.5681.522
≤ 65 years97/401.0750.6571.759
Gender0.823
Male180/770.9070.5321.545
Female68/301.1030.6471.879
BMI0.781
≤ 24 (kg/m2)208/901.0970.5672.125
> 24 (kg/m2)40/170.9110.471.765
History of upper abdominal surgery0.343
No239/1020.6160.191.996
Yes9/51.6250.5015.269
Liver cirrhosis/fibrosis0.827
No229/920.9670.412.283
Yes20/111.0340.4382.439
Ascites0.695
No241/1030.8320.2153.218
Yes7/41.2020.3114.648
Etiology0.917
Tumor234/970.7980.2952.157
Other15/61.2540.4643.392
Obstruction site0.696
Supra-confluence114/470.9640.5951.563
Infra-confluence134/601.0370.641.681
Bilirubin0.038
> 340 (μmol/L)123/273.3661.1579.796
170-340 (μmol/L)119/751.7370.6274.811
< 170 (μmol/L)6/50.5760.2081.595
Bile duct diameter0.002
≥ 6 (mm)167/602.8451.7384.656
< 6 (mm)81/570.3510.2150.575
Table 3 Domain-specific multivariable analysis of strategy selection-related factors
Characteristics
Success/failure
P value
Exp(B)
95%CI for Exp(B)
Timing0.300
Emergency56/300.7570.4471.282
Elective192/771.3210.782.237
Location0.672
Operating room129/501.1550.5932.25
Puncture room81/400.8630.431.732
Bedside38/170.8660.4441.687
Angle0.835
45°-135°185/800.9450.5561.607
Other63/271.0580.6221.799
Length0.649
≥ 12 (cm)63/301.1290.671.901
< 12 (cm)185/770.8860.5261.492
Position0.598
Right side31/121.2140.592.497
Left side217/950.8240.41.695
Ultrasound probe0.026
Conventional198/960.4510.2230.911
Puncture-specific50/112.2191.0984.486
Catheter diameter0.440
≤ 8 French191/780.8120.4781.379
> 8 French57/291.2320.7252.094
Operator change0.762
Yes8/11.2420.3065.04
No47/340.8050.1983.267
Target change0.101
Yes6/45.9620.70450.501
No49/310.1680.021.421
Table 4 Final comprehensive multivariable logistic regression model of factors associated with procedural success
Variable
β coefficient
Odds ratio (95%CI)
P value
Puncture performer’s title (high vs low)0.3531.423 (0.823-2.461)0.207
Puncture experience (more vs less)0.6061.833 (1.124-2.989)0.015
Dedicated probe (special vs ordinary)0.9012.462 (1.157-5.238)0.019
Patient cooperation (good vs poor)1.0052.732 (1.136-6.568)0.025
Bile duct diameter (≥ 6 mm vs < 6 mm)0.7542.126 (1.300-3.478)0.003
Bilirubin level (> 340 μmol/L vs < 340 μmol/L)0.9462.576 (1.523-4.357)< 0.001
Constant-3.1870.041< 0.001
Table 5 Bedside scoring system for predicting the probability of successful percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage
Predictor
Points assigned if:
Points
Operator experienceMore experience2
Dedicated probeSpecialized probe used3
Procedural cooperationGood cooperation3
Bile duct diameter≥ 6 mm2
Serum bilirubin> 340 μmol/L3
Operator seniorityHigh title1
Total score0-14
Predicted success probabilityCorresponding score range
Low0-4
Intermediate5-9
High10-14


Write to the Help Desk