Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 114182
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.114182
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.114182
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of study cohorts, n (%)
| Characteristic | ERAS group (n = 31) | TRAD group (n = 30) | P value |
| Gender | 0.717 | ||
| Male | 21 (67.74) | 19 (63.33) | |
| Female | 10 (32.26) | 11 (36.67) | |
| Age (months) | 10.30 (6.75, 16.50) | 8.95 (6.00, 11.88) | 0.398 |
| Weight (kg) | 9.00 (7.00, 10.00) | 8.00 (6.33, 9.23) | 0.251 |
| ASA physical status | 1.000 | ||
| II | 26 (83.87) | 26 (86.67) | |
| III | 5 (16.13) | 4 (13.33) | |
| STAMP score | 0.823 | ||
| ≥ 4 (malnourished) | 8 (25.81) | 7 (23.33) | |
| < 4 (normal) | 23 (74.19) | 23 (76.67) | |
| Enterostomy site | 0.716 | ||
| Small bowel | 20 (64.52) | 18 (60.00) | |
| Colon | 11 (35.48) | 12 (40.00) | |
| Stoma closure interval (days) | 178.00 (120.00, 225.50) | 166.50 (119.50, 229.75) | 0.948 |
| Causes of enterostomy | |||
| Necrotizing enterocolitis | 11 (35.48) | 8 (26.67) | 0.457 |
| Hirschsprung’s disease | 8 (25.81) | 7 (23.33) | 0.823 |
| Meconium peritonitis | 1 (3.23) | 3 (10.00) | 0.581 |
| Adhesive bowel obstruction | 3 (9.68) | 2 (6.67) | 1.000 |
| Intussusception | 1 (3.23) | 0 (0.00) | 1.000 |
| Incarcerated hernia | 0 (0.00) | 1 (3.33) | 0.492 |
| Intestinal atresia | 1 (3.23) | 3 (10.00) | 0.581 |
| Anal atresia | 3 (9.68) | 4 (13.33) | 0.963 |
| Intestinal torsion | 1 (3.23) | 2 (6.67) | 0.977 |
| Trauma | 2 (6.45) | 0 (0.00) | |
Table 2 Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Parameter | ERAS group (n = 31) | TRAD group (n = 30) | P value |
| Intraoperative data | |||
| Operation time (minutes) | 85.58 ± 19.10 | 88.27 ± 23.54 | 0.626 |
| Estimated blood loss (mL) | 10.00 (10.00, 12.50) | 10.00 (10.00, 20.00) | 0.329 |
| Fluid infusion speed (mL/kg/hour) | 5.94 ± 1.21 | 8.63 ± 2.19 | < 0.001 |
| Combined anesthesia | 25 (80.65) | 7 (23.33) | < 0.001 |
| Catheters utilization | |||
| NGTs | 13 (41.94) | 23 (76.67) | 0.006 |
| Urinary catheters | 6 (19.36) | 13 (43.33) | 0.043 |
| Abdominal drains | 5 (16.13) | 12 (40.00) | 0.038 |
| Catheters duration | |||
| NGTs (days) | 2.00 (2.00, 3.00) | 3.00 (3.00, 4.00) | < 0.001 |
| Urinary catheters (days) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.75) | 3.00 (2.00, 3.00) | 0.003 |
| Abdominal drains (days) | 2.00 (2.00, 3.00) | 4.50 (4.00, 5.25) | 0.003 |
| Recovery outcomes | |||
| Active ambulation (days) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | 3.00 (2.00, 3.00) | < 0.001 |
| First flatus (days) | 2.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 3.00 (2.00, 3.75) | < 0.001 |
| Liquid diet initiation (days) | 2.00 (2.00, 3.00) | 4.00 (3.00, 4.00) | < 0.001 |
| IV infusion duration (days) | 5.23 ± 0.76 | 7.33 ± 1.94 | < 0.001 |
| TEN achievement (days) | 5.68 ± 0.79 | 8.37 ± 1.94 | < 0.001 |
| Complications | 6 (19.36) | 5 (16.67) | 0.785 |
| Abdominal distension | 5 (16.13) | 3 (10.00) | 0.742 |
| Nausea/vomiting | 3 (9.68) | 2 (6.67) | 1.000 |
| Cough with sputum production | 1 (3.23) | 2 (6.67) | 0.977 |
| Incision infection | 2 (6.45) | 1 (3.33) | 1.000 |
| Incomplete bowel obstruction | 0 (0.00) | 1 (3.33) | 0.492 |
| By severity (Clavien-Dindo) | |||
| Grade I | 4 (12.90) | 2 (6.67) | 0.698 |
| Grade II | 2 (6.45) | 3 (10.00) | 0.969 |
| Hospitalization cost (yuan) | 14542.87 ± 4322.97 | 19030.64 ± 5541.51 | < 0.001 |
| 30-day outcomes | |||
| Weight restoration | 25 (80.65) | 22 (73.33) | 0.497 |
| Readmissions | 1 (3.23) | 1 (3.33) | 1.000 |
| Wound infection | 1 (3.23) | 0 (0.00) | 1.000 |
| Partial obstruction | 0 (0.00) | 1 (3.33) | 0.492 |
Table 3 Multivariable linear regression analysis of factors influencing caregiver satisfaction rate and postoperative length of stay
| Variable | Caregiver satisfaction rate | Postoperative LOS | ||
| β (95%CI) | P value | β (95%CI) | P value | |
| ERAS group vs TRAD group | 0.24 (0.06, 0.42) | 0.011 | -2.29 (-3.28, -1.30) | < 0.001 |
| Age (continuous, per month) | 0.01 (-0.01, 0.02) | 0.226 | -0.05 (-1.00, -0.01) | 0.006 |
| Body weight (continuous, per kg) | -0.02 (-0.07, 0.02) | 0.336 | 0.15 (-0.09, 0.39) | 0.222 |
| Operative duration (continuous, per minute) | 0 (-0.01, 0.01) | 0.650 | 0.01 (-0.02, 0.03) | 0.682 |
| Enterostomy site (ref: Small bowel) | 0.11 (-0.09, 0.32) | 0.257 | 0.73 (-0.35, 1.80) | 0.181 |
| Postoperative complications (ref: No) | -0.20 (-0.45, 0.05) | 0.112 | 0.94 (-0.42, 2.29) | 0.170 |
| Preoperative nutritional status (ref: STAMP score < 4) | -0.03 (-0.25, 0.19) | 0.780 | 1.03 (-0.17, 2.23) | 0.091 |
| Anesthetic technique (ref: Alone) | -0.02 (-0.21, 0.18) | 0.864 | -0.98 (-2.02, 0.06) | 0.063 |
| Social support level (ref. Inadequate) | 0.11 (-0.19, 0.41) | 0.473 | -1.22 (-2.86, 0.42) | 0.141 |
Table 4 Comparison of perioperative laboratory indicators, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Parameter | ERAS group (n = 31) | TRAD group (n = 30) | P value |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | |||
| Anesthesia induction | 6.09 (5.04, 6.84) | 4.70 (4.17, 5.11) | < 0.001 |
| POD2 | 5.35 (4.91, 6.63) | 6.22 (5.46, 9.23) | 0.045 |
| WBC count (× 109/L) | |||
| Admission | 8.08 ± 1.97 | 8.95 ± 2.09 | 0.100 |
| POD2 | 10.90 ± 3.28 | 11.44 ± 2.77 | 0.489 |
| NEUT count (× 109/L) | |||
| Admission | 4.81 ± 1.26 | 5.19 ± 1.42 | 0.266 |
| POD2 | 5.57 ± 1.46 | 7.63 ± 1.93 | < 0.001 |
| CRP (mg/L) | |||
| POD2 | 10.05 (4.75, 28.34) | 27.14 (11.90, 39.86) | 0.019 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | |||
| Admission | 117.13 ± 11.35 | 119.63 ± 12.36 | 0.413 |
| POD2 | 109.58 ± 12.63 | 106.13 ± 14.63 | 0.328 |
| Albumin (g/L) | |||
| Admission | 42.09 ± 3.01 | 42.89 ± 4.78 | 0.444 |
| POD2 | 36.56 ± 4.47 | 34.69 ± 4.89 | 0.125 |
| Prealbumin (g/L) | |||
| Admission | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.320 |
| POD2 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.003 |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | |||
| Admission | 135.94 ± 3.39 | 134.23 ± 4.01 | 0.078 |
| POD2 | 134.77 ± 3.66 | 133.27 ± 3.50 | 0.106 |
- Citation: Zhu K, Zhang F, Ou WW, Ke Y, Zhu ZY, Tan XM, Wang H, Sun CC, Gao HF, Su YL. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of pediatric enterostomy closure. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(8): 114182
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i8/114182.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.114182