BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 121387
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.121387
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease patients in the three treatment groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
Variable
Sitz bath group (n = 72)
Sitz bath plus acupoint application group (n = 69)
Ziwu-Liuzhu time-specific external treatment group (n = 76)
Statistic
P value
Age (years)34.8 ± 9.135.6 ± 8.733.9 ± 8.4F = 0.710.493
Male42 (58.3)39 (56.5)44 (57.9)χ2 = 0.050.973
BMI (kg/m2)21.9 ± 2.622.3 ± 2.822.1 ± 2.5F = 0.420.66
Smoking history15 (20.8)13 (18.8)15 (19.7)χ2 = 0.100.95
Alcohol consumption12 (16.7)11 (15.9)13 (17.1)χ2 = 0.050.973
Disease duration (months), median IQR19.0 (12.0-28.0)18.0 (11.0-27.0)20.0 (13.0-29.0)H = 0.860.651
Age at diagnosis (years)31.2 ± 8.632.0 ± 8.330.7 ± 8.1F = 0.520.596
Previous fistula surgery21 (29.2)20 (29.0)22 (28.9)χ2 = 0.000.999
Number of fistula tracts1.6 ± 0.71.5 ± 0.61.6 ± 0.7F = 0.480.62
Complex fistula31 (43.1)29 (42.0)33 (43.4)χ2 = 0.040.981
Preoperative CDAI score256.4 ± 41.2252.7 ± 39.6254.1 ± 40.5F = 0.160.853
Preoperative PDAI score6.4 ± 1.26.3 ± 1.16.2 ± 1.2F = 0.530.592
Preoperative VAS score6.1 ± 1.35.9 ± 1.26.0 ± 1.3F = 0.340.714
Preoperative GAD-7 score9.2 ± 2.69.0 ± 2.49.1 ± 2.5F = 0.130.878
CRP (mg/L)31.8 ± 8.630.6 ± 8.131.1 ± 8.4F = 0.340.713
TNF-α (pg/mL)41.7 ± 9.540.9 ± 9.241.2 ± 9.4F = 0.130.879
IL-6 (pg/mL)33.6 ± 8.332.8 ± 7.933.1 ± 8.0F = 0.160.85
White blood cell count (× 109/L)8.9 ± 2.18.7 ± 2.08.8 ± 2.2F = 0.140.867
Hemoglobin (g/L)118.6 ± 15.2120.1 ± 14.7119.5 ± 15.0F = 0.220.804
Albumin (g/L)37.9 ± 4.538.4 ± 4.338.1 ± 4.6F = 0.280.758
Table 2 Changes in Crohn’s Disease Activity Index and Perianal Disease Activity Index scores from baseline to week 4 among the three treatment groups, mean ± SD
Variable
Sitz bath group (n = 72)
Sitz bath plus acupoint application group (n = 69)
Ziwu-Liuzhu time-specific external treatment group (n = 76)
Statistic
P value
Effect size (η2)
CDAI score
Baseline256.4 ± 41.2252.7 ± 39.6254.1 ± 40.5F = 0.160.8530.001
Week 4183.7 ± 34.9151.8 ± 30.6121.6 ± 27.4F = 57.32< 0.0010.347
Δ CDAI72.7 ± 28.6100.9 ± 30.2132.5 ± 35.7F = 61.08< 0.0010.362
95%CI for Δ CDAI66.1-79.393.8-108.0124.5-140.5
Within-group comparison (paired t)t = 21.56t = 27.75t = 32.34< 0.001 for all
PDAI score
Baseline6.4 ± 1.26.3 ± 1.16.2 ± 1.2F = 0.530.5920.005
Week 44.3 ± 1.03.1 ± 0.92.0 ± 0.8F = 98.46< 0.0010.478
Δ PDAI2.1 ± 0.93.2 ± 1.04.2 ± 1.1F = 74.92< 0.0010.411
95%CI for Δ PDAI1.89-2.312.96-3.443.95-4.45
Within-group comparison (paired t)t = 19.80t = 26.59t = 33.28< 0.001 for all
Table 3 Changes in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale scores and anxiety severity at baseline and week 4 among the three treatment groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
Group
Sitz bath (n = 72)
Sitz bath plus acupoint application group (n = 69)
Ziwu-Liuzhu time-specific external treatment (n = 76)
Baseline GAD-79.2 ± 2.69.0 ± 2.49.1 ± 2.5
Week 4 GAD-77.9 ± 2.45.8 ± 2.04.1 ± 1.7
Δ GAD-71.3 ± 1.63.2 ± 1.75.0 ± 1.9
Δ GAD-7 95%CI0.9-1.72.8-3.64.6-5.4
Effect size (Cohen d)0.51.362.22
Within-group t value6.1815.3721.48
Within-group P value< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
No anxiety 0-413 (18.1)22 (31.9)40 (52.6)
Mild 5-938 (52.8)34 (49.3)29 (38.2)
Moderate 10-1417 (23.6)11 (15.9)6 (7.9)
Severe ≥ 154 (5.5)2 (2.9)1 (1.3)
Table 4 Propensity score matching and sensitivity analysis results, mean ± SD/median interquartile range
Comparison
Indicator
Ziwu-Liuzhu time-specific external treatment group
Comparator group
Statistic
P value
Ziwu-Liuzhu time-specific external treatment vs sitz bath (PSM, n = 58 pairs)Healing time (day)19 (16-23)29 (25-34)Z = -5.21< 0.001
CRP after treatment (mg/L)9.1 ± 4.317.8 ± 6.1t = -8.64< 0.001
TNF-α after treatment (pg/mL)17.1 ± 5.427.4 ± 7.6t = -7.93< 0.001
IL-6 after treatment (pg/mL)11.4 ± 4.720.6 ± 6.8t = -8.11< 0.001
Total effective rate (%)53/58 (91.4)37/58 (63.8)χ2 = 12.37< 0.001
Logistic regression OR (95%CI)4.12 (1.89-8.97)Reference< 0.001
Ziwu-Liuzhu time-specific external treatment vs sitz bath plus acupoint application group (PSM, n = 61 pairs)Healing time (day)18 (15-22)24 (20-28)Z = -4.28< 0.001
VAS pain score2.2 ± 0.93.3 ± 1.1t = -5.43< 0.001
CRP after treatment (mg/L)8.7 ± 4.013.4 ± 5.2t = -5.58< 0.001
TNF-α after treatment (pg/mL)16.5 ± 5.322.4 ± 6.4t = -5.01< 0.001
IL-6 after treatment (pg/mL)10.9 ± 4.516.2 ± 5.7t = -5.32< 0.001
Total effective rate (%)57/61 (93.4)49/61 (80.3)χ2 = 5.290.021
Logistic regression OR (95%CI)3.26 (1.28-8.29)Reference0.013


Write to the Help Desk