BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 120890
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120890
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
Variable
ESPB group (n = 91)
TAPB group (n = 92)
t/χ2/Z value
P value
Age (years)42.3 ± 12.641.8 ± 13.10.2630.793
Sex0.1320.716
Male49 (53.8)52 (56.5)
Female42 (46.2)40 (43.5)
BMI (kg/m²)23.8 ± 3.224.1 ± 3.4-0.610.543
ASA classification-0.4260.67
Class I34 (37.4)32 (34.8)
Class II48 (52.7)52 (56.5)
Class III9 (9.9)8 (8.7)
Appendicitis type0.0590.808
Acute appendicitis78 (85.7)80 (87.0)
Chronic appendicitis13 (14.3)12 (13.0)
Pathological classification0.1550.925
Simple31 (34.1)29 (31.5)
Suppurative47 (51.6)50 (54.3)
Gangrenous13 (14.3)13 (14.2)
Nature of surgery0.0110.916
Elective26 (28.6)27 (29.3)
Emergency65 (71.4)65 (70.7)
Operative time (minutes)58.4 ± 15.256.9 ± 14.80.680.497
Pneumoperitoneum duration (minutes)45.6 ± 12.344.2 ± 11.90.7870.432
Intraoperative blood loss (mL)15.0 (10.0, 25.0)15.0 (10.0, 20.0)-0.5240.6
Intraoperative remifentanil consumption (μg)312.5 ± 68.4305.8 ± 71.20.6510.516
Table 2 Comparison of postoperative visceral pain Visual Analog Scale scores between groups at different time points (scores), mean ± SD
Time point
State
ESPB group (n = 91)
TAPB group (n = 92)
t value
P value
2 hours postoperativelyRest2.1 ± 0.83.2 ± 0.9-8.741< 0.001
Activity2.8 ± 0.94.0 ± 1.0-8.648< 0.001
6 hours postoperativelyRest2.3 ± 0.73.1 ± 0.8-7.275< 0.001
Activity3.0 ± 0.83.9 ± 0.9-7.243< 0.001
12 hours postoperativelyRest1.9 ± 0.62.4 ± 0.7-5.237< 0.001
Activity2.5 ± 0.73.1 ± 0.8-5.479< 0.001
24 hours postoperativelyRest1.4 ± 0.51.5 ± 0.6-1.2420.216
Activity1.9 ± 0.62.0 ± 0.7-1.0550.293
48 hours postoperativelyRest0.8 ± 0.40.9 ± 0.5-1.5170.131
Activity1.2 ± 0.51.3 ± 0.5-1.380.169
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative somatic pain Visual Analog Scale scores between groups at different time points (scores), mean ± SD
Time point
State
ESPB group (n = 91)
TAPB group (n = 92)
t value
P value
2 hours postoperativelyRest2.4 ± 0.82.3 ± 0.90.7980.426
Activity3.5 ± 1.03.4 ± 1.10.6490.517
6 hours postoperativelyRest2.2 ± 0.72.1 ± 0.80.9050.367
Activity3.2 ± 0.93.1 ± 0.90.7540.452
12 hours postoperativelyRest1.8 ± 0.61.7 ± 0.71.0540.293
Activity2.6 ± 0.82.5 ± 0.80.8530.395
24 hours postoperativelyRest1.3 ± 0.51.2 ± 0.51.3690.173
Activity1.9 ± 0.61.8 ± 0.61.1330.259
48 hours postoperativelyRest0.7 ± 0.40.7 ± 0.401
Activity1.1 ± 0.51.0 ± 0.51.3510.178
Table 4 Comparison of postoperative rescue analgesia between groups
Variable
ESPB group (n = 91)
TAPB group (n = 92)
χ2/Z value
P value
Rescue analgesia, n (%)12 (13.2)24 (26.1)4.7680.029
Tramadol consumption (mg)0 (0, 0)0 (0, 100)-2.5180.012
Table 5 Comparison of postoperative recovery quality indicators between groups, mean ± SD
Variable
ESPB group (n = 91)
TAPB group (n = 92)
t/Z value
P value
Time to first ambulation (hours)12.4 ± 3.813.1 ± 4.2-1.1850.238
Time to first flatus (hours)19.8 ± 5.420.5 ± 5.8-0.8540.394
Postoperative hospital stay (days)2.0 (2.0, 3.0)2.0 (2.0, 3.0)-0.8760.381
Table 6 Comparison of postoperative nausea and vomiting between groups, n (%)
Variable
ESPB group (n = 91)
TAPB group (n = 92)
Z/χ2 value
P value
PONV grade-0.8920.372
Grade 062 (68.1)58 (63.0)
Grade 118 (19.8)20 (21.7)
Grade 28 (8.8)10 (10.9)
Grade 33 (3.3)4 (4.3)
PONV incidence29 (31.9)34 (37.0)0.5160.473
Antiemetic use11 (12.1)14 (15.2)0.380.538
Table 7 Comparison of patient satisfaction with analgesia between groups
Variable
ESPB group (n = 91)
TAPB group (n = 92)
Z value
P value
Satisfaction score-2.4860.013
1 point1 (1.1)2 (2.2)
2 points3 (3.3)8 (8.7)
3 points12 (13.2)18 (19.6)
4 points48 (52.7)46 (50.0)


Write to the Help Desk