Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 120740
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120740
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120740
Table 1 Comparison of demographic characteristics between two groups, n (%)
| Parameter | ESD group (n = 156) | ESTD group (n = 101) | t/χ2 | P value |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 65.84 ± 8.85 | 64.68 ± 9.42 | 1.001 | 0.318 |
| Gender | 0.059 | 0.808 | ||
| Male | 120 (76.92) | 79 (78.22) | ||
| Female | 36 (23.08) | 22 (21.78) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 23.51 ± 3.22 | 24.16 ± 3.54 | 1.508 | 0.133 |
| Smoking habit | 0.116 | 0.734 | ||
| Frequent | 94 (60.26) | 63 (62.38) | ||
| Occasional/non-smoker | 62 (39.74) | 38 (37.62) | ||
| Drinking habit | 0.295 | 0.587 | ||
| Frequent | 78 (50.00) | 54 (53.47) | ||
| Occasional/non-drinker | 78 (50.00) | 47 (46.53) | ||
| Diabetes | 0.857 | 0.355 | ||
| Yes | 31 (19.87) | 25 (24.75) | ||
| No | 125 (80.13) | 76 (75.25) | ||
| Hypertension | 0.084 | 0.772 | ||
| Yes | 49 (31.41) | 30 (29.70) | ||
| No | 107 (68.59) | 71 (70.30) |
Table 2 Comparison of disease characteristics between two groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Parameter | ESD group (n = 156) | ESTD group (n = 101) | t/χ2 | P value |
| Histological type | 0.345 | 0.557 | ||
| ESCC | 109 (69.87) | 74 (73.27) | ||
| BE-EAC | 47 (30.13) | 27 (26.73) | ||
| TNM staging | 0.086 | 0.769 | ||
| Tis | 62 (39.74) | 42 (41.58) | ||
| T1a | 94 (60.26) | 59 (58.42) | ||
| Tumor invasion depth | 0.441 | 0.802 | ||
| M1 | 53 (33.97) | 37 (36.63) | ||
| M2 | 62 (39.74) | 36 (35.64) | ||
| M3 | 41 (26.28) | 28 (27.72) | ||
| Maximum tumor diameter (mm) | 33.86 ± 10.98 | 31.92 ± 9.75 | 1.440 | 0.151 |
| Tumor location | 1.756 | 0.416 | ||
| Upper esophagus | 16 (10.26) | 6 (5.94) | ||
| Middle esophagus | 58 (37.18) | 36 (35.64) | ||
| Lower esophagus | 82 (52.56) | 59 (58.42) | ||
| Macroscopic type | 0.637 | 0.888 | ||
| Elevated type | 40 (25.64) | 29 (28.71) | ||
| Flat type | 88 (56.41) | 52 (51.49) | ||
| Depressed type | 23 (14.74) | 16 (15.84) | ||
| Mixed types | 5 (3.21) | 4 (3.96) | ||
| Circumferential extent | 1.139 | 0.286 | ||
| < 50% | 98 (62.82) | 70 (69.31) | ||
| 50%-75% | 58 (37.18) | 31 (30.69) |
Table 3 Comparison of the resection effect between two groups, n (%)
| Parameter | ESD group (n = 156) | ESTD group (n = 101) | χ2 | P value |
| En bloc resection rate | 151 (96.79) | 99 (98.02) | 0.039 | 0.844 |
| R0 resection rate | 139 (89.10) | 97 (96.04) | 3.932 | 0.047 |
Table 4 Comparison of the recurrence rates between two groups, n (%)
| Parameter | ESD group (n = 156) | ESTD group (n = 101) | χ2 | P value |
| Postoperative 1 year | 5 (3.21) | 2 (1.98) | 0.039 | 0.844 |
| Postoperative 2 years | 12 (7.69) | 4 (3.96) | 1.463 | 0.227 |
| Postoperative 3 years | 20 (12.82) | 5 (4.95) | 4.324 | 0.038 |
Table 5 Comparison of the incidence of procedure-related adverse reactions between two groups, n (%)
| Parameter | ESD group (n = 156) | ESTD group (n = 101) | χ2 | P value |
| Adverse reaction incidence rate | 27 (17.31) | 8 (7.92) | 4.592 | 0.032 |
| Delayed bleeding | 8 (5.13) | 3 (2.97) | ||
| Esophageal stricture | 16 (10.26) | 8 (7.92) | ||
| Infection | 2 (1.28) | 1 (0.99) | ||
| Moderate-to-severe events | 11 (7.05) | 2 (1.98) | 2.312 | 0.128 |
Table 6 Comparison of the inflammatory markers between two groups, mean ± SD
| Parameter | ESD group (n = 156) | ESTD group (n = 101) | t | P value |
| IL-8 (pg/mL) | ||||
| Preoperative | 15.32 ± 3.25 | 15.28 ± 3.43 | 0.090 | 0.929 |
| Postoperative 3 days | 20.58 ± 4.76 | 18.94 ± 4.12 | 2.844 | 0.005 |
| Postoperative 7 days | 15.89 ± 3.82 | 14.76 ± 3.05 | 2.629 | 0.009 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | ||||
| Preoperative | 8.45 ± 1.58 | 8.41 ± 1.62 | 0.205 | 0.838 |
| Postoperative 3 days | 11.02 ± 2.34 | 10.15 ± 2.01 | 3.081 | 0.002 |
| Postoperative 7 days | 8.76 ± 1.95 | 8.12 ± 1.74 | 2.691 | 0.008 |
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | ||||
| Preoperative | 3.44 ± 1.02 | 3.39 ± 1.08 | 0.372 | 0.710 |
| Postoperative 3 days | 10.38 ± 3.16 | 9.31 ± 2.85 | 2.744 | 0.006 |
| Postoperative 7 days | 6.05 ± 1.83 | 5.42 ± 1.76 | 2.726 | 0.007 |
- Citation: Zhang D, Hao XX, Zhang C, Liang Y. Efficacy and adverse reactions of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection in early esophageal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 120740
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i7/120740.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120740