Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 118843
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.118843
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.118843
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups
| Factors/groups | Combined treatment group | Single treatment group | χ2/t/Z value | P value | |
| Age (year), median (IQR) | 3(3.00, 6.50) | 3 (3.00, 5.00) | -0.314 | 0.754 | |
| Gender | Male | 17 | 23 | 0.26 | 0.61 |
| Female | 8 | 8 | |||
| Surgical age, median (IQR) | 0.7 (0.46, 2.00) | 0.7 (0.42, 1.00) | -0.099 | 0.921 | |
| Symptom duration, median (IQR) | 2 (1.00, 2.25) | 2 (1.50, 2.50) | -0.296 | 0.767 | |
| Pathological type | Short segment | 1 | 1 | -0.513 | 0.608 |
| Common type | 19 | 22 | |||
| Long segment | 5 | 8 | |||
Table 2 Wexner Fecal Incontinence Score[4]
| Score/frequency | Never occurred | Occasionally (< 1 time/month) | Sometimes (> 1 time/month, < 1 time/week) | Frequently (≥ 1 time/week) | Daily (≥ 1 time/day) |
| Solid fecal incontinence | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Liquid fecal incontinence | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Gas incontinence | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Need to alter lifestyle | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Need for protective tools | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Table 3 Comparison of anorectal manometry parameters and Fecal Incontinence Scores between the two groups before treatment, mean ± SD
| Factors/groups | Combined treatment group | Single treatment group | χ2/t/Z value | P value | |
| Anorectal manometry parameters | Anal resting pressure (mmHg) | 25.44 ± 3.94 | 24.55 ± 3.04 | 0.956 | 0.343 |
| Initial sensation threshold (mL) | 55.40 ± 3.12 | 54.71 ± 3.93 | 0.715 | 0.478 | |
| Defecation sensation threshold (mL) | 121.24 ± 10.61 | 121.58 ± 8.38 | -0.131 | 0.896 | |
| Defecation urgency threshold (mL) | 148.44 ± 6.14 | 148.00 ± 4.36 | 0.313 | 0.755 | |
| Biofeedback current intensity (mA) | 4.20 ± 0.42 | 4.15 ± 0.51 | 0.232 | 0.819 | |
| Fecal Incontinence Score | 9.56 ± 2.63 | 9.70 ± 2.22 | -0.231 | 0.818 | |
Table 4 Comparison of anorectal manometry parameters and fecal incontinence scores between the two groups before and after treatment, mean ± SD
| Factors/groups | Before treatment | After treatment | t value | P value | ||
| Combined treatment group | Anorectal manometry parameters | Anal resting pressure (mmHg) | 25.44 ± 3.94 | 35.08 ± 1.23 | -11.662 | < 0.001a |
| Initial sensation threshold (mL) | 55.40 ± 3.12 | 41.16 ± 2.73 | 17.156 | < 0.001a | ||
| Defecation sensation threshold (mL) | 121.24 ± 10.61 | 101.60 ± 5.82 | 8.117 | < 0.001a | ||
| Defecation urgency threshold (mL) | 148.44 ± 6.14 | 154.00 ± 4.46 | -3.606 | < 0.001a | ||
| Fecal Incontinence Score | 9.56 ± 2.63 | 4.16 ± 0.94 | 9.659 | < 0.001a | ||
| Single treatment group | Anorectal manometry parameters | Anal resting pressure (mmHg) | 24.55 ± 3.04 | 34.45 ± 0.81 | -17.514 | < 0.001a |
| Initial sensation threshold (mL) | 54.71 ± 3.93 | 47.03 ± 2.39 | 9.303 | < 0.001a | ||
| Defecation sensation threshold (mL) | 121.58 ± 8.38 | 110.29 ± 4.89 | 6.481 | < 0.001a | ||
| Defecation urgency threshold (mL) | 148.00 ± 4.36 | 151.42 ± 5.81 | -2.622 | 0.011a | ||
| Fecal Incontinence Score | 9.70 ± 2.22 | 4.90 ± 1.16 | 10.659 | < 0.001a | ||
Table 5 Comparison of anorectal manometry parameters and fecal incontinence scores between the two groups after treatment, mean ± SD
| Factors/groups | Combined treatment group | Single treatment group | χ2/t/Z value | P value | |
| Anorectal manometry parameters | Anal resting pressure (mmHg) | 35.08 ± 1.23 | 34.45 ± 0.81 | 2.265 | 0.028a |
| Initial sensation threshold (mL) | 41.16 ± 2.73 | 47.03 ± 2.39 | -8.577 | < 0.001a | |
| Defecation sensation threshold (mL) | 101.60 ± 5.82 | 110.29 ± 4.89 | -6.007 | < 0.001a | |
| Defecation urgency threshold (mL) | 154.00 ± 4.46 | 151.42 ± 5.81 | 1.803 | 0.077 | |
| Fecal Incontinence Score | 4.16 ± 0.94 | 4.90 ± 1.16 | -2.579 | 0.013a | |
- Citation: Shi L, Zhang ZQ, Cheng Y, Qi SQ, Zhang T, Shen WC, Hu XY, Zhou YL, Ju JJ. Pelvic floor physical therapy combined with biofeedback electrical stimulation for postoperative fecal incontinence in children with Hirschsprung’s disease. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 118843
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i7/118843.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.118843